|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Feb 9, 2024 19:55:24 GMT
because IT died before some change in the law allowing IT to be recorded as a gender other than IT was in truth. Being under 18 was and will be far more of import on that ok i’ll bow to that. I came across a news rag whinge that a recent change to allow such individuals to confound future time teams by having the wrong value inserted on death certificates could not be backdated. This individual’s name was specifically mentioned in connection with this whinge. |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Feb 9, 2024 20:03:47 GMT
It matters little what Sunak said or Steamer they’re both liars and prat’s,I was going to say practiced liars but clearly not.
Anyway who gives a stuff what it says on the death certificate,the only thing worth remembering is a human being mixed up maybe but again that’s irrelevant to the fact that someone so young had their life cut short brutally.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 9, 2024 20:42:49 GMT
I suspect the cult of genitalia will try to use all this against the heretics .
|
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Feb 9, 2024 20:50:28 GMT
I suspect the cult of genitalia will try to use all this against the heretics . Shouldn’t that read cut not cult and hetro not heretics or was it a deliberate play on words?  |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 9, 2024 20:54:57 GMT
No actually that makes it clear you don't understand simple English Simple English is "Women have vaginas, not penises" My 5 year old granddaughter knows this and has said so in her school! What the gender recognition act is a case of English being used to declare blackiswhite. The law is a huge ass. We're talking about what Starmer actually said. That and maybe you should look at the governments official position on the matter. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 9, 2024 21:17:18 GMT
I suspect the cult of genitalia will try to use all this against the heretics . Shouldn’t that read cut not cult and hetro not heretics or was it a deliberate play on words? No on everything.😉 |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 9, 2024 22:39:44 GMT
No actually that makes it clear you don't understand simple English Simple English is "Women have vaginas, not penises" My 5 year old granddaughter knows this and has said so in her school! What the gender recognition act is a case of English being used to declare blackiswhite. The law is a huge ass.You can say that again - probably explains why Starmer is so confused. |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Feb 9, 2024 23:15:50 GMT
No actually that makes it clear you don't understand simple English Simple English is "Women have vaginas, not penises" My 5 year old granddaughter knows this and has said so in her school! What the gender recognition act is a case of English being used to declare blackiswhite. The law is a huge ass. Well that’s her on report and her parents and you getting a visit from social services with police accompaniment to detain you on suspicion of giving her ‘knowledge beyond her years’ I’ll dig out the ISBN number of the book all teachers and TA’s were required to ensure four year olds have been taught as part of their sex education by order of the english dept of education and science 2014. It certainly gave both plod and social services red faces when they were shown it by my daughter. They thought a single mum rape victim would be a pushover. They never came back. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 10, 2024 11:10:01 GMT
Simple English is "Women have vaginas, not penises" My 5 year old granddaughter knows this and has said so in her school! What the gender recognition act is a case of English being used to declare blackiswhite. The law is a huge ass.You can say that again - probably explains why Starmer is so confused. All he's done is support the government's official policy on this. |
|
