|
Post by witchfinder on Feb 9, 2024 10:07:10 GMT
Political Capital ?
The mother of a murdered trans person was in the House of Commons, murdered because she was different, and Sunak makes a cheap jibe at Starmer about trans people.
I think its almost all the Tories have left to go on, culture wars, because they have nothing else to offer.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 9, 2024 10:31:23 GMT
Political Capital ? The mother of a murdered trans person was in the House of Commons, murdered because she was different, and Sunak makes a cheap jibe at Starmer about trans people. I think it’s almost all the Tories have left to go on, culture wars, because they have nothing else to offer. Another leftie lie . Sunak said … “think I have counted almost 30 in the last year. Pensions, planning, peerages, public sector pay, tuition fees, childcare, second referendums, defining a woman - although in fairness that was only 99% of a U-turn." Lefties are falsely claiming that a Sunak made a jibe against transgenders . Some might be too thick to see the difference and some might be lying . It’s one or the other .
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 9, 2024 10:42:20 GMT
Having literally just been told the mother was in the house it was at best a stupid comment to make. Especially as he was just parroting dim witted alt right comments about Starmer whose comments on what is a woman were only ever echoing the official government line. Seems it's Sunak doing a U Turn on that.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 9, 2024 10:45:34 GMT
Having literally just been told the mother was in the house it was at best a stupid comment to make. Especially as he was just parroting dim witted alt right comments about Starmer whose comments on what is a woman were only ever echoing the official government line. Seems it's Sunak doing a U Turn on that. It was a stupid thing to say at that time but it wasn’t a jibe at transgenders . To claim it was is only parroting leftie lies ( not that you were ).
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Feb 9, 2024 10:52:01 GMT
The majority of our press ( including most Right leaning papers ) believe it was a tacky and inapropriate comment designed to attract cheap laughs.
It was the magnetic opposite of Diplomacy and tact
To suggest that a an ex Director of Public Prosecutions, educated at a Grammer School and University does not know what a woman is, cannot be anything other than a cheap jibe.
People like Sunak, Peter Bone, Truss and Rees Mogg belong in the 18th century
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 9, 2024 11:32:35 GMT
The majority of our press ( including most Right leaning papers ) believe it was a tacky and inapropriate comment designed to attract cheap laughs. It was the magnetic opposite of Diplomacy and tact To suggest that a an ex Director of Public Prosecutions, educated at a Grammer School and University does not know what a woman is, cannot be anything other than a cheap jibe.Starmer believes that there are 34,000 'women' in this country with a penis - I think it's quite clear that he has no idea what a woman is.
|
|
|
Post by Tinculin on Feb 9, 2024 13:14:56 GMT
Brianna Ghey was a child.
A child who was murdered in an atrocious manner that is an unforgivable attack and crime.
It was a premeditated, planned murder by two of her peers who were motivated by some sick dark fantasy they decided to act out.
Somehow amongst all of this, her mother has shown considerable strength and empathy.
I don’t think any of the above has anything to do with the whole ‘what is a woman’ debate.
I also don’t think it was the most appropriate joke to be making in parliament when her mother was present - anymore than you’d make a joke about cancer in a room who’s relative has recently passed away from it.
|
|
|
Post by Dogburger on Feb 9, 2024 15:10:02 GMT
I think this is what's called confected outrage. I don't see that the Ghey murder had anything to with what Sunak said, which was about his uncertainty of the definition of a woman - and Brianna Ghey was NOT a woman. I think that SUnak should have made more of Starmer's extraordinary attempt to make political capital out of this murder. And the more publicity he gets the more plays he gets of his attack on Captain U-Turn. Indeed he should have done and starting with the rules of the House of Commons 25.73 . No reference should be made to visitors whether in the public gallery or any other part of the chamber (except for the purpose of a motion for their withdrawal) So Starmer broke parliamentary rules and should have been pulled on it by the speaker who obviously doesn't know the rules either . Shambles
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Feb 9, 2024 16:51:43 GMT
Starmer broke parliamentary protocol and the speaker should have admonished him. MP's in the chamber are not supposed to directly identify anyone in the public gallery. Starmer is at fault here. He attempted to score petty political points in order to hide his own embarrassment over saying a woman can have a penis. Starmer is a penis.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 9, 2024 18:16:52 GMT
The majority of our press ( including most Right leaning papers ) believe it was a tacky and inapropriate comment designed to attract cheap laughs. It was the magnetic opposite of Diplomacy and tact To suggest that a an ex Director of Public Prosecutions, educated at a Grammer School and University does not know what a woman is, cannot be anything other than a cheap jibe.Starmer believes that there are 34,000 'women' in this country with a penis - I think it's quite clear that he has no idea what a woman is. No actually that makes it clear you don't understand simple English
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Feb 9, 2024 18:53:31 GMT
Apparently Brianna's death certificate says she was male. because IT died before some change in the law allowing IT to be recorded as a gender other than IT was in truth.
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Feb 9, 2024 18:57:43 GMT
The majority of our press ( including most Right leaning papers ) believe it was a tacky and inapropriate comment designed to attract cheap laughs. It was the magnetic opposite of Diplomacy and tact To suggest that a an ex Director of Public Prosecutions, educated at a Grammer School and University does not know what a woman is, cannot be anything other than a cheap jibe. People like Sunak, Peter Bone, Truss and Rees Mogg belong in the 18th century except he does not.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 9, 2024 19:27:59 GMT
Apparently Brianna's death certificate says she was male. because IT died before some change in the law allowing IT to be recorded as a gender other than IT was in truth. Being under 18 was and will be far more of import on that
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2024 19:49:20 GMT
Starmer believes that there are 34,000 'women' in this country with a penis - I think it's quite clear that he has no idea what a woman is. No actually that makes it clear you don't understand simple English Simple English is "Women have vaginas, not penises" My 5 year old granddaughter knows this and has said so in her school! What the gender recognition act is a case of English being used to declare blackiswhite. The law is a huge ass.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2024 19:53:44 GMT
Apparently Brianna's death certificate says she was male. There is a movement among the loonier twitterati that want him to be given a posthumous gender recognition certificate. Despite the fact no one can have one until they are over 18. *rolls eyes*
|
|