|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 2, 2024 6:37:42 GMT
Where are these so called fucking charities when our own homeless only have a shop doorway whilst this filth thrust up on us by the EUSSR are given 4 star accomodation? Charity starts at home FFS.
Charities lobbying against Rwanda Bill given £209m of taxpayer money.
Members of the House of Lords expressed their concerns about Rwanda legislation but voted against a Liberal Democrat attempt to kill the Bill entirely
The Government has given £209 million to charities that have lobbied the House of Lords to vote against the Rwanda Bill and have described the policy as “deeply harmful” and setting a “dangerous precedent”.
On Monday, a group of 265 charities, focused largely on helping refugees and migrants, criticised the legislation, designed to stop the small boat Channel crossings. They said it represented “a threat to the universality of human rights”.
|
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 2, 2024 8:22:03 GMT
Most 'charities' have now completed their journey from groups of well meaning volunteers wearing threadbare jumpers, to professional criminals wearing suits.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Feb 2, 2024 8:58:48 GMT
They said it represented “a threat to the universality of human rights”. You actually agree with their point here but you don't wish for asylum seekers to be entitled to human rights. P. S. Please can we have thread titles which give an inkling of the subject? Makes the forum more readable. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 2, 2024 9:03:24 GMT
Most 'charities' have now completed their journey from groups of well meaning volunteers wearing threadbare jumpers, to professional criminals wearing suits. I tend to agree, although I'd prefer "Political activists" rather than criminals. Although either way, it's why I no longer donate to charity. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 2, 2024 9:07:36 GMT
They said it represented “a threat to the universality of human rights”. You actually agree with their point here but you don't wish for asylum seekers to be entitled to human rights. P. S. Please can we have thread titles which give an inkling of the subject? Makes the forum more readable. Fuck their human rights. And criminals do not have the right...And as for the thread title what exacly are you offeded by? How many of our own homeless could be put into a occomadation with that money given to charities who will just piss it up the wall? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 2, 2024 9:10:43 GMT
Most 'charities' have now completed their journey from groups of well meaning volunteers wearing threadbare jumpers, to professional criminals wearing suits. I tend to agree, although I'd prefer "Political activists" rather than criminals. Although either way, it's why I no longer donate to charity.Its a bloody joke mate. 200 million would get many of our own homeless in accomadation......I have responded to our resident forever offended saying the same. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 2, 2024 9:11:42 GMT
Most 'charities' have now completed their journey from groups of well meaning volunteers wearing threadbare jumpers, to professional criminals wearing suits. I tend to agree, although I'd prefer "Political activists" rather than criminals. Although either way, it's why I no longer donate to charity. The line between the two is quite blurred because so much of 'left' politics is now funded and underpinned by criminal activity - ie people trafficking etc. . We are almost in a Batman style dystopia *I put left in scare quotes for a reason |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 2, 2024 9:15:47 GMT
Prepare yourselves for when Liebour get in. This nonsense will be gale force 10.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Feb 2, 2024 9:33:36 GMT
Where are these so called fucking charities when our own homeless only have a shop doorway whilst this filth thrust up on us by the EUSSR are given 4 star accomodation? Charity starts at home FFS.
Charities lobbying against Rwanda Bill given £209m of taxpayer money.
Members of the House of Lords expressed their concerns about Rwanda legislation but voted against a Liberal Democrat attempt to kill the Bill entirely
The Government has given £209 million to charities that have lobbied the House of Lords to vote against the Rwanda Bill and have described the policy as “deeply harmful” and setting a “dangerous precedent”.
On Monday, a group of 265 charities, focused largely on helping refugees and migrants, criticised the legislation, designed to stop the small boat Channel crossings. They said it represented “a threat to the universality of human rights”.
"LibDems" LOL. Whenever I think LibDem I smile. I mean, Labour are dangerous and a real threat. The LibDems are just dangerous lol. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 2, 2024 9:57:17 GMT
Well, if they had any brains they'd be dangerous.
Fortunately, they don't.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Feb 2, 2024 13:24:50 GMT
You actually agree with their point here but you don't wish for asylum seekers to be entitled to human rights. P. S. Please can we have thread titles which give an inkling of the subject? Makes the forum more readable. Fuck their human rights. And criminals do not have the right...And as for the thread title what exacly are you offeded by? How many of our own homeless could be put into a occomadation with that money given to charities who will just piss it up the wall? If you can find the bit where I said I was offended I'll give you £200. But of course you can't, because you totally made that up. Then you'll tell me there's nothing wrong with your reading skills. 🙄 |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 2, 2024 14:20:22 GMT
Fuck their human rights. And criminals do not have the right...And as for the thread title what exacly are you offeded by? How many of our own homeless could be put into a occomadation with that money given to charities who will just piss it up the wall? If you can find the bit where I said I was offended I'll give you £200. But of course you can't, because you totally made that up. Then you'll tell me there's nothing wrong with your reading skills. 🙄 When are you not offended Andy? All you do is bitch about thread titles and try to get them changed.. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Feb 2, 2024 16:27:01 GMT
I think the forum is easier to read when the titles refer to the content. Nothing to do with being offended or bitching. 🙄
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 2, 2024 17:32:14 GMT
I think the forum is easier to read when the titles refer to the content. Nothing to do with being offended or bitching. 🙄 Yes it easy to read your agenda Andy...Hardly my fault that you have set your own record of bitching about the thread titles rather than address the content.. |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Feb 2, 2024 17:44:27 GMT
Where are these so called fucking charities when our own homeless only have a shop doorway whilst this filth thrust up on us by the EUSSR are given 4 star accomodation? Charity starts at home FFS.
Charities lobbying against Rwanda Bill given £209m of taxpayer money.
Members of the House of Lords expressed their concerns about Rwanda legislation but voted against a Liberal Democrat attempt to kill the Bill entirely
The Government has given £209 million to charities that have lobbied the House of Lords to vote against the Rwanda Bill and have described the policy as “deeply harmful” and setting a “dangerous precedent”.
On Monday, a group of 265 charities, focused largely on helping refugees and migrants, criticised the legislation, designed to stop the small boat Channel crossings. They said it represented “a threat to the universality of human rights”.
Do we know what percent of the money given to human rights charities was spent opposing the government's Rwanda bill? The way it is worded in the Torygraph article is misleading as it suggest all £209 million was used for that purpose when in fact it will only be a small fraction of the total. As a taxpayer I'd be more upset by the nearly half a billion spent on achieving zero deportations to Rwanda myself. Especially as it is just electioneering and will have next to no benefit in terms of reducing immigration. |
|
