|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Feb 2, 2024 19:36:46 GMT
Yes, any one of those would work as a title. FFS does not. Just another thread that the band of lefty aided trolls wnat to see locked...We know the score monte as it is a well known ploy and and occurence....I wonder if you would like to address the fact that this shower of shit we have as a government have no money when it comes to our own homeless but can find the odd £200 million to give to some lefty woke bunch of arseholes to piss up the wall? Who has asked for the thread to be locked? 🤔 |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 2, 2024 19:40:09 GMT
Just another thread that the band of lefty aided trolls wnat to see locked...We know the score monte as it is a well known ploy and and occurence....I wonder if you would like to address the fact that this shower of shit we have as a government have no money when it comes to our own homeless but can find the odd £200 million to give to some lefty woke bunch of arseholes to piss up the wall? Who has asked for the thread to be locked? 🤔 Like TSM stated get an adult to explain...Yet again it is duly noted that all you have done is bitch about the thread title and orffer nothing in debate.. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Feb 2, 2024 19:51:26 GMT
Who has asked for the thread to be locked? 🤔 Like TSM stated get an adult to explain...Yet again it is duly noted that all you have done is bitch about the thread title and orffer nothing in debate.. Apart from my opening paragraph that you replied to... 😂 |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 2, 2024 19:55:02 GMT
Like TSM stated get an adult to explain...Yet again it is duly noted that all you have done is bitch about the thread title and orffer nothing in debate.. Apart from my opening paragraph that you replied to... 😂 This is my opening paragraph to this topic..."Where are these so called fucking charities when our own homeless only have a shop doorway whilst this filth thrust up on us by the EUSSR are given 4 star accomodation? Charity starts at home FFS."
So what are the forever offended finding so hard to understand?
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Feb 2, 2024 20:05:41 GMT
They said it represented “a threat to the universality of human rights”. You actually agree with their point here but you don't wish for asylum seekers to be entitled to human rights. P. S. Please can we have thread titles which give an inkling of the subject? Makes the forum more readable. Watch it — mocking the hard of understanding can get you targeted… |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 2, 2024 20:09:41 GMT
Who has asked for the thread to be locked? 🤔 Like TSM stated get an adult to explain...Yet again it is duly noted that all you have done is bitch about the thread title and orffer nothing in debate.. As ever.
Note that none of your detractors have anything to offer re the actual subject. |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Feb 2, 2024 20:12:16 GMT
Like TSM stated get an adult to explain...Yet again it is duly noted that all you have done is bitch about the thread title and orffer nothing in debate.. As ever.
Note that none of your detractors have anything to offer re the actual subject. What was this then? |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 2, 2024 20:15:11 GMT
As ever.
Note that none of your detractors have anything to offer re the actual subject. What was this then? Whoops, yes - my bad.
One of you, in one post, has managed to almost discuss the subject.
Well done you. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 2, 2024 20:17:11 GMT
Now let's get back to the plot:
Should HM Govt be funding quasi-political bodies posing as charities?
Should there be more transparency as to what these bodies actually stand for?
Is more scrutiny and greater regulation required?
|
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Feb 2, 2024 20:21:20 GMT
Whoops, yes - my bad.
One of you, in one post, has managed to almost discuss the subject.
Well done you. Whereas in your 6 contributions to the thread have yielded just one post addressing the topic, one addressing the title and 4 criticising other contributions which include 2 personal attacks. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 2, 2024 20:25:40 GMT
Whoops, yes - my bad.
One of you, in one post, has managed to almost discuss the subject.
Well done you. Whereas in your 6 contributions to the thread have yielded just one post addressing the topic, one addressing the title and 4 criticising other contributions which include 2 personal attacks. And that's still one better than you.
So which were the personal attacks, then?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 2, 2024 20:31:52 GMT
But, to drag the debate back to the subject:
Perhaps organisations with political agendas should lose charitable status. Or perhaps charities that carry out political lobbying should be required to be more transparent about their affiliations. Perhaps governments should not fund quasi-political bodies thinly disguised as charities.
I say that we need more regulation of “Charities”. Any political agenda/affiliations of said “Charities” should be published and that no “Charity” should receive government funding.
Discuss.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 2, 2024 21:12:32 GMT
You actually agree with their point here but you don't wish for asylum seekers to be entitled to human rights. P. S. Please can we have thread titles which give an inkling of the subject? Makes the forum more readable. Watch it — mocking the hard of understanding can get you targeted…It depends on what side of the fence you sit Pat.. |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Feb 2, 2024 21:23:03 GMT
Where are these so called fucking charities when our own homeless only have a shop doorway whilst this filth thrust up on us by the EUSSR are given 4 star accomodation? Charity starts at home FFS.
Charities lobbying against Rwanda Bill given £209m of taxpayer money.
Members of the House of Lords expressed their concerns about Rwanda legislation but voted against a Liberal Democrat attempt to kill the Bill entirely
The Government has given £209 million to charities that have lobbied the House of Lords to vote against the Rwanda Bill and have described the policy as “deeply harmful” and setting a “dangerous precedent”.
On Monday, a group of 265 charities, focused largely on helping refugees and migrants, criticised the legislation, designed to stop the small boat Channel crossings. They said it represented “a threat to the universality of human rights”.
I agree with you about the pointlessness and waste of money of the Rwanda deportations. But Crisis, Shelter, Centre Point, St Mungo’s, SHP, Thames Reach, Housing Justice, are just a few of the charities for the homeless in the U.K. Which do you support…? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 2, 2024 21:27:33 GMT
Where are these so called fucking charities when our own homeless only have a shop doorway whilst this filth thrust up on us by the EUSSR are given 4 star accomodation? Charity starts at home FFS.
Charities lobbying against Rwanda Bill given £209m of taxpayer money.
Members of the House of Lords expressed their concerns about Rwanda legislation but voted against a Liberal Democrat attempt to kill the Bill entirely
The Government has given £209 million to charities that have lobbied the House of Lords to vote against the Rwanda Bill and have described the policy as “deeply harmful” and setting a “dangerous precedent”.
On Monday, a group of 265 charities, focused largely on helping refugees and migrants, criticised the legislation, designed to stop the small boat Channel crossings. They said it represented “a threat to the universality of human rights”.
I agree with you about the pointlessness and waste of money of the Rwanda deportations. But Crisis, Shelter, Centre Point, St Mungo’s, SHP, Thames Reach, Housing Justice, are just a few of the charities for the homeless in the U.K. Which do you support…?The ones who support our own homeless and not the ones who support the filth thrust upon the UK by the EUSSR. Like I stated in my opening paragraph "charity starts at home" |
|
