|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Feb 4, 2024 10:29:13 GMT
My work PC is for Sage 50, Microsoft Office, VirtualBox, email, and occasional web browsing, not YouTube. It doesn't have or need speakers to be functional. It doesn't have a TPM module either. Besides, your arguments are so abysmal, whatever you watched, can't be worth watching anyway. Stop making pathetic excuses for your inability to process audio on this Forum platform … and assumptions counter POV were trash. Your failure to remedy this dire situation and failure to inform us you were not the least bit interested in listening to other POV … suggests you were solely here to push your Agenda politics - Deep State war-mongering is my deduction. Used as an excuse to TRASH our last Forum … containing a precious 19-year old Archive from the General Public. Maybe it is time for you to walk away, Vinny … because this seriously angers the Membership🤬🤬🤬 … who won’t appreciate all the wasted time they spent trying to educate you … when you wern’t listening. What use are 99% of the videos dropped here … without their sound commentary? … they are rendered useless. We always got the impression that with some people here … we were ‘pissing in the wind’ and whatever we dropped was being blanket ignored … I wonder how may more of you there are, swarming all over this Forum, sitting in rooms full of translators, using PC’s with no sound, churning out your cut/paste comments like robots on a conveyor belt?? Go and get a LIFE Vinny …. your moral bankruptcy has hit the buffers. I wonder if the guys at SETI are using similar computers with the sound off? … no wonder the Arecibo Message fell on deaf ears.🤔 |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 4, 2024 10:34:12 GMT
Here is an interesting story -
|
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Feb 4, 2024 11:15:47 GMT
Dub, the only one getting hysterically angry about different points of view, is you.
You were asked for proof and couldn't provide it.
All you had to do was concede that it's a belief, like religion is a belief.
You have a point of view. That doesn't make you right.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Feb 4, 2024 11:28:14 GMT
Thanks for that interesting drop, Orac … it led to Güenter Nimtz
… who claims he found a way to sent information at 4.7times the speed of light … more “Wow!” signals eh? … but sent from Earth this time. By humans … Impressive.
|
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 4, 2024 12:43:37 GMT
Dubs, for now I would be very dubious indeed about any claim that a signal (information) has traveled faster than light. There is a distinction between 'an effect' you can interpret given both sides, and information travelling from place to place
|
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Feb 4, 2024 14:40:12 GMT
Dub, without posting dubious YouTube links, by what method of physics is faster than light communication possible, either by vessel or radio beam?
At what frequency would one build a radio to detect, and by what modulation method?
Answer in as simple terms as you can.
Short, to the point and testable by scientific methods.
|
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 4, 2024 14:56:38 GMT
Dubs is responding to a link i posted. It is not detailed, but amounts a claim that faster than light information transfer can be achieved with quantum tunneling and that we started communicating with an alien civilisation in 2019.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Feb 4, 2024 16:55:29 GMT
And how does one build a quantum tunneling machine and test the theory?
|
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 4, 2024 17:05:24 GMT
Current theory says that faster than light communication is impossible. So, if it exists, it is still secret.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Feb 4, 2024 17:10:08 GMT
The laws of physics are nobody's property.
No matter what the technology, if one person can build it, so can another.
Plans and theoretical papers can be studied.
Any scientific theory can be tested.
|
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 4, 2024 17:14:46 GMT
The laws of physics are nobody's property. No matter what the technology, if one person can build it, so can another. Plans and theoretical papers can be studied. Any scientific theory can be tested. The current theory is that it impossible and this theory still stands. So, if a means to do it is known, it is a secret known by only some |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Feb 4, 2024 17:17:31 GMT
If it's impossible, then Dubdrifter is basically believing in fantasy and grasping at straws.
|
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 4, 2024 17:23:30 GMT
If it's impossible, then Dubdrifter is basically believing in fantasy and grasping at straws. Yes If it is possible and the means is secret then he is correct |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Feb 4, 2024 17:53:51 GMT
This is the mind zone of a UK forum.
We deal in facts, not suppositions on this board.
Either something is possible or it isn't.
Proof of possibility requires a method.
No Yank secrecy laws apply in the UK.
If there is a method, the onus is on Dubdrifter to provide proof and publish.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Feb 5, 2024 7:40:09 GMT
This is the mind zone of a UK forum. We deal in facts, not suppositions on this board. Either something is possible or it isn't. Proof of possibility requires a method. No Yank secrecy laws apply in the UK. If there is a method, the onus is on Dubdrifter to provide proof and publish. Stop dribbling tripe … if you don’t do Youtube … you won’t be listening to the information being dropped here and getting INFORMED about the research of Güenter Nimtz. … and others. Get your head out the sand, Vinny … and stop scatter-shotting opinion on stuff you’re not interested in. |
|
