|
Post by see2 on Jan 28, 2024 23:25:09 GMT
Typical trashy comments by some of the press. At no point is the claim that men can have a cervix mentioned within quotation marks. There is the claim by the paper that it was meant but that is certainly not proof. The main cause of distortion was caused by confusing the issue with whether or not the comment that 'only women have a cervix' was a transgender remark. Lammy said he believed it could occur through surgery. That is his belief and is almost certainly wrong. I need to see a clear and unequivocal claim that men can have or can grow a cervix, in quotation marks, with the name, date and place the comment was made. Typical comments by a lefty troll who asks questions but doesn't like the answers. I asked for unequivocal evidence, I got insinuations, that might be good enough for you, its not good enough for me. So troll off with your nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jan 29, 2024 0:18:32 GMT
It's not at all difficult for some people to understand that tribal differences within Rwanda could make some residents there unsafe, whereas outsiders would have nothing to do with those tribal differences, and therefore be safe. I thought they were political asylum seekers, escaping the regime?
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 29, 2024 7:40:27 GMT
Typical comments by a lefty troll who asks questions but doesn't like the answers. I asked for unequivocal evidence, I got insinuations, that might be good enough for you, its not good enough for me. So troll off with your nonsense. Even your prick of a leader has stated the same c2. Typical fucking labour scum. Say one thing today and deny it tomorrow. Just like the ring pieces that support them.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jan 29, 2024 14:42:19 GMT
Labour as per usual c2...
Typical trashy comments by some of the press. At no point is the claim that men can have a cervix mentioned within quotation marks. There is the claim by the paper that it was meant but that is certainly not proof. The main cause of distortion was caused by confusing the issue with whether or not the comment that 'only women have a cervix' was a transgender remark. Lammy said he believed it could occur through surgery. That is his belief and is almost certainly wrong. I need to see a clear and unequivocal claim that men can have or can grow a cervix, in quotation marks, with the name, date and place the comment was made. It seems to worry some people a great deal what others have under their clothes
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 29, 2024 17:34:41 GMT
It was David Lammy - Labours Foreign Secretary. So is it official Labour Policy that men can grow a cervix? Nope, Lammy thought that someone could have surgery to produce one. but that is certainly not Labour Policy. Even so it is a world away from actually growing one. So what is the idea behind pumping them full of hormones as he suggested?
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 29, 2024 18:29:54 GMT
I asked for unequivocal evidence, I got insinuations, that might be good enough for you, its not good enough for me. So troll off with your nonsense. Even your prick of a leader has stated the same c2. Typical fucking labour scum. Say one thing today and deny it tomorrow. Just like the ring pieces that support them. Proof please, i.e. actual evidence that includes when, where and quote inside quotation marks.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 29, 2024 18:40:25 GMT
Nope, Lammy thought that someone could have surgery to produce one. but that is certainly not Labour Policy. Even so it is a world away from actually growing one. So what is the idea behind pumping them full of hormones as he suggested? "various procedures" i.e. surgical intervention. He is probably wrong anyway but it is only his opinion, but that won't stop Righties spreading the lies.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 29, 2024 21:11:29 GMT
From your posted website. "In August, Ms Duffield liked a tweet by broadcaster Piers Morgan, who criticised a news story from CNN about cancer screening for "individuals with a cervix", responding: "Do you mean women?" When the MP was called transphobic for appearing to endorse the tweet, she replied: "I'm a 'transphobe' for knowing that only women have a cervix… ?!". She later acknowledged that some trans men have a cervix."--The probability is that many or most transgender individuals are not formed in the full biologically gender way that most people are. Which is why Starmer claims it is 'wrong (it is an insult to some transgender people) to state that 'only females have a cervix'.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 29, 2024 21:16:21 GMT
Nope, Lammy thought that someone could have surgery to produce one. but that is certainly not Labour Policy. Even so it is a world away from actually growing one. So what is the idea behind pumping them full of hormones as he suggested? He indicated both Hormones and Surgery. Both of which can be part of changing sex.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 29, 2024 22:11:27 GMT
So what is the idea behind pumping them full of hormones as he suggested? He indicated both Hormones and Surgery. Both of which can be part of changing sex. You cannot change sex - that is the whole point. You can change gender..
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Jan 29, 2024 22:22:31 GMT
He indicated both Hormones and Surgery. Both of which can be part of changing sex. You cannot change sex - that is the whole point. You can change gender.. It depends on what you mean by gender. Here is the dictionary entry:
Are you planning on changing species?
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jan 30, 2024 7:21:17 GMT
You cannot change sex - that is the whole point. You can change gender.. It depends on what you mean by gender. Here is the dictionary entry:
Are you planning on changing species?
The dictionary definition is as old as the farts on here.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jan 30, 2024 10:25:42 GMT
Revealed: The UN sends asylum seekers to Rwanda - while opposing Britain's scheme to send migrants to the country - link
Not one single illegal immigrant who has paid a people smuggler to get them across the channel from the safe EU state of France is in any sense of the word a 'refugee'. To call these criminals refugees is utterly preposterous and is the reason the government should withdraw from the 1951 Refugee Convention. If you want to see refugees, genuine refugees, google Kutupalong, those poor sods are refugees.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 30, 2024 12:49:45 GMT
I see that 4000 'refugees' who were pencilled in as possible cases for transfer to Rwanda have now disappeared.
Quite predictable.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jan 30, 2024 20:59:43 GMT
I see that 4000 'refugees' who were pencilled in as possible cases for transfer to Rwanda have now disappeared. Quite predictable. just as they hoped
|
|