|
|
Post by Equivocal on Jan 28, 2024 4:33:57 GMT
Revealed: The UN sends asylum seekers to Rwanda - while opposing Britain's scheme to send migrants to the country - link
|
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jan 28, 2024 8:36:55 GMT
Revealed: The UN sends asylum seekers to Rwanda - while opposing Britain's scheme to send migrants to the country - linkWhat's that got to do with my post. Your own bloody government of imbeciles are accepting Rwandan asylum seekers. Surely if Rwanda is safe we should not accept them. Sunak is playing you for a fool. |
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Jan 28, 2024 9:35:59 GMT
Under both Starmer and the Poodle Tories …
… all Middle Eastern/African/Asian … ANY refugee will have to do is write ‘Trans-gender persecution, gay, bi and threat of death’ on the Immigration Form … and they will be handed a British Passport in 3 seconds … and given 4* accommodation, a house and car and a VOTE to unseat indigenous interests in every UK Community.
… the next minute they will be murdering LOCAL white LGBTQ Communities picnicking in Reading parks … causing riots outside Birmingham schools trying to teach ‘tolerance’ and the racist/phobic Religious Lobby/Leftists/Police/MSM will brush it ALL under the carpet in a nano-second … sticking “lone nutter” on the Crime Report.
These “Lone nutters” are now a Sleeper Religious Army breeding like rabbits in the UK with nasty values attacking our FREEDOMS … and thanks to the Collective above implementing zero security and border control for the last 40 years/crushing indigenous labour and union rights … immigrants have been crow-barred in to be a cheap labour force with zero Rights … a replacement that can be exploited by Globalists/WEF for immense PROFIT.
*************
Comment:
… Now, a growing number are becoming a serious danger to the security of the UK … and soon there will be no haven in the WEST for LGBTQ … and indigenous white people will continue to be persecuted by the racist BBC in their own lands.
Heavily economically defunded and removed to the fringes of MSM Society … their voices and protests are being eradicated from mainstream Media conversation by these Religious Factions/WEF that own and control everything of key importance.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 28, 2024 12:15:00 GMT
I think you miss my point which is that there are grey areas in terms of the mix between what might be termed normal areas of the sexes and those who do not fit into that norm. The problem is that for those from the grey areas are dealing with that which is normal for them. Excluding the few idiots out there who bring disrespect to those trapped in their own biological mix-up. Some people are born with 6 fingers but we dont then pretend that the Human Race normally has 6 fingers - we treat it as a flaw in their genes and unnatural. Exactly, in terms of biological perfection any deviation could be termed as a flaw. Even so, it is a reality for those caught up in these grey areas. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 28, 2024 12:21:13 GMT
As you answered my post you should answer my question first. I personally cannot grow a 'cervix'. I would need to read, in context, that which leads you to ask the question "can you grow a cervix". Under what context could you grow a cervix? The question is who claimed that men can grow a cervix? Where is their comment, in context, so that it can be challenged. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 28, 2024 12:26:15 GMT
Under what context could you grow a cervix? The question is who claimed that men can grow a cervix? Where is their comment, in context, so that it can be challenged. Labour as per usual c2...
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 28, 2024 12:28:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 28, 2024 18:24:35 GMT
Under what context could you grow a cervix? The question is who claimed that men can grow a cervix? Where is their comment, in context, so that it can be challenged. It was David Lammy - Labours Foreign Secretary. So is it official Labour Policy that men can grow a cervix? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2024 18:43:52 GMT
It's not at all difficult for some people to understand that tribal differences within Rwanda could make some residents there unsafe, whereas outsiders would have nothing to do with those tribal differences, and therefore be safe. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jan 28, 2024 19:19:42 GMT
It's not at all difficult for some people to understand that tribal differences within Rwanda could make some residents there unsafe, whereas outsiders would have nothing to do with those tribal differences, and therefore be safe. Nonsense. We should not send people to a country where that is possible. I have never heard anyone ask for political asylum from the UK, EU, America. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2024 19:20:52 GMT
It's not at all difficult for some people to understand that tribal differences within Rwanda could make some residents there unsafe, whereas outsiders would have nothing to do with those tribal differences, and therefore be safe. Nonsense. We should not send people to a country where that is possible. I have never heard anyone ask for political asylum from the UK, EU, America. As I said, not at all difficult for SOME people to understand. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jan 28, 2024 20:29:53 GMT
Nonsense. We should not send people to a country where that is possible. I have never heard anyone ask for political asylum from the UK, EU, America. As I said, not at all difficult for SOME people to understand. As I said, Nonsense. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 28, 2024 23:16:12 GMT
The question is who claimed that men can grow a cervix? Where is their comment, in context, so that it can be challenged. Labour as per usual c2...
Typical trashy comments by some of the press. At no point is the claim that men can have a cervix mentioned within quotation marks. There is the claim by the paper that it was meant but that is certainly not proof. The main cause of distortion was caused by confusing the issue with whether or not the comment that 'only women have a cervix' was a transgender remark. Lammy said he believed it could occur through surgery. That is his belief and is almost certainly wrong. I need to see a clear and unequivocal claim that men can have or can grow a cervix, in quotation marks, with the name, date and place the comment was made. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 28, 2024 23:20:53 GMT
The question is who claimed that men can grow a cervix? Where is their comment, in context, so that it can be challenged. It was David Lammy - Labours Foreign Secretary. So is it official Labour Policy that men can grow a cervix? Nope, Lammy thought that someone could have surgery to produce one. but that is certainly not Labour Policy. Even so it is a world away from actually growing one. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 28, 2024 23:21:22 GMT
Labour as per usual c2...
At no point is the claim that men can have a cervix mentioned within quotation marks. There is the claim by the paper that it was meant but that is certainly not proof. The main cause of distortion was caused by confusing the issue with whether or not the comment that 'only women have a cervix' was a transgender remark. Lammy said he believed it could occur through surgery. That is his belief and is almost certainly wrong. I need to see a clear and unequivocal claim that men can have or can grow a cervix, in quotation marks, with the name, date and place the comment was made. Typical comments by a lefty troll who asks questions but doesn't like the answers. |
|
