Climate change / pollution and answers

Gen Z are vaping like bunnies in a crack lab now instead … probably marginally more damaging than smoking high tar cigarettes. Look at pics of youngsters lungs after only 5 years vaping.
The NHS knew it … and promoted it. 🙄🤯

I think a healthier lifestyle isn’t a bad thing … the Government only spent/wasted those Billions sending our troops to die on foreign fields for foreign interests. … and bombing the f. out of the environment.
What’s the Green jackboot print of today’s NATO ? … with it’s allegedly “harmless MOD low grade nuclear waste currently being scattered all over the Eastern Block and Russia right now.

Improving the quality of food delivered to the poorest people … affordable good nutrition, freedom and choice is the key here I feel.

… Taking the harmful junk out of junk food … is the way to stop too many working class people farting more than cows … and thus being lined up for eradication by Green Deep State Globalists who seem to want to do ‘euthanasia’ as a side-line hobby … to anything that gives off excess emissions!🤔

The storms we have had lately are a symptom of weather. It is the AGW lobby that has settled on trends as the meaningful way to look at climate and the trends are not showing any major problems at all. Some years we have very few  storms some years we lots of storms. Weather depends on a host of reasons and is what we experience, climate is broadly what we would expect on average and most years are never average or at least have not been for as long as i can remember.

I do not disagree but they are not evidence of climate change unless there is a trend and so far those trends are not seen then any event that is extreme in any direction hot, cold, wet, windy  is heralded as evidence of AGW.

Oh dear. No one is disputing a warming trend; its magnitude, the reasons why it is happening and what we can and should do about it are the main points of discussion.
The loss events graph is not related to the frequency of specific events it is related to the loss in specific events which is always going to increase with the building on higher risk zones  better reporting and clearer communication. If you do the same type of graph with loss of life in such events it drops rapidly.

Another thing we can do is use less energy.
Better insulation, energy efficient appliances, fewer overseas holidays etc.

I was discussing weather thermals and climate manipulation programmes being engaged by universities and the military months ago … glad you’ve finally caught up to where some climate damage has come from … the U.S. Military in the Northern Hemisphere trying to play God with weather since WW2.

Here’s more details to jog your memory:

ukpoliticsdebate.boards.net/thread/604/secret-state-toxic-spray-killing

…. all I got back then were denials and accusations it was all ‘b*******cks … but as you know … everything sprayed in the atmosphere can potentially affect the delicate balances of ozone/protective ionospheric layering.

Check out the details of the HAARP Programme … and the microwave technology now visible on many U.S. military ships that have the potential to shift cloud formations into another airstream … and deprive a country of precious rainfall … causing droughts and heatwaves … all part of the weather warfare programme which can have serious implications … because once drought is triggered, new dust bowls form … and a domino affect of thermal changes can become permanent … until the land is artificially irrigated back into recovery, foliage grows and the landmass cools significantly.

Iran accused U.S. warships in the Atlantic and Mediterranean using microwave technology to push seasonal rain clouds north into Europe causing uncharacteristic flash flooding … water they traditionally got at that time of the year.