|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 13, 2024 11:12:49 GMT
And I suffer from the same. It's funny how the usuals pick up on it tho. Lefty hypocrisy at its best aye what lefty old bean. What hypocrisy would that be the left pulling up the loony right element on this forum. About there lies about the labour party. What lies?
We keep on being told that the 'right' are making things up about Labour, yet they can not put up one argument to suggest otherwise, just because you say it's lies, doesn't mean it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jan 13, 2024 11:18:26 GMT
What hypocrisy would that be the left pulling up the loony right element on this forum. About there lies about the labour party. What lies?
We keep on being told that the 'right' are making things up about Labour, yet they can not put up one argument to suggest otherwise, just because you say it's lies, doesn't mean it is.
When Lefty says that someone else is "Lying" he really means that they have a different opinion to himself.
So, when Lefty levels that accusation he is himself lying.
Hmmm... "Lying Lefty". Has a ring to it, don't you think?
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 13, 2024 11:27:44 GMT
What hypocrisy would that be the left pulling up the loony right element on this forum. About there lies about the labour party. What lies?
We keep on being told that the 'right' are making things up about Labour, yet they can not put up one argument to suggest otherwise, just because you say it's lies, doesn't mean it is.
Oh my how many times have I for one posted evidence that Sir Kier wasn't involved in the Savile case . But you keep constantly lying saying he was and the nourmous times you been corrected by other posters . |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 13, 2024 11:30:17 GMT
What lies?
We keep on being told that the 'right' are making things up about Labour, yet they can not put up one argument to suggest otherwise, just because you say it's lies, doesn't mean it is.
When Lefty says that someone else is "Lying" he really means that they have a different opinion to himself.
So, when Lefty levels that accusation he is himself lying.
Hmmm... "Lying Lefty". Has a ring to it, don't you think?
So for instance when I posted out that Sir kier had no involvement in the Savile case was just my opinion and not Based on fact. And you call me a lier lol . |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 13, 2024 11:32:26 GMT
What lies?
We keep on being told that the 'right' are making things up about Labour, yet they can not put up one argument to suggest otherwise, just because you say it's lies, doesn't mean it is.
When Lefty says that someone else is "Lying" he really means that they have a different opinion to himself.
So, when Lefty levels that accusation he is himself lying.
Hmmm... "Lying Lefty". Has a ring to it, don't you think?
Yes it seems to be a theme that runs with all the lefties on this forum. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 13, 2024 11:36:55 GMT
What lies?
We keep on being told that the 'right' are making things up about Labour, yet they can not put up one argument to suggest otherwise, just because you say it's lies, doesn't mean it is.
Oh my how many times have I for one posted evidence that Sir Kier wasn't involved in the Savile case . But you keep constantly lying saying he was and the nourmous times you been corrected by other posters . Point out the 'lies'.
Was the Jimmy Saville case a cover-up?
The BBC said no evidence of misconduct by Savile had been found, denying there had been a cover-up of his activities. But rumours of Savile's sex crimes had circulated for years, yet no one dared print them. In a TV documentary presented by Louis Theroux in April 2000, Savile denied rumours about him being a paedophile. Eight years later Savile started legal proceedings against a newspaper linking him to abuse at the Jersey children's home Haut de la Garenne. Then in 2009 Savile was interviewed under caution by Surrey police investigating an alleged indecent assault at Duncroft school - the case was dropped as there was insufficient evidence to take any further action
Starmer, who was director of public prosecutions between 2008 and 2013, addressed questions about what he knew about up to 38 prosecutions of post office operators initiated by the CP
* Explain how Starmer could not be involved with Savile/Post Office scandal he was DPP in 2009?
You are a LIAR.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 13, 2024 11:37:37 GMT
Have you ever been to Wales? Let's look at the points I raised Shall we No - lets hear you answer the question rather than yet another tedious rewriting of history. What sectors of the economy in Wales do you believe Labour has run better than the Tories in England. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jan 13, 2024 11:38:06 GMT
So for instance when I posted out that Sir kier had no involvement in the Savile case was just my opinion and not Based on fact. And you call me a lier lol . Sorry Lefty, but it happened on Starmer's watch, while he was in charge. The responsibility is his and that's just a fact. To claim otherwise would be a bare faced lie. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 13, 2024 11:58:08 GMT
When Lefty says that someone else is "Lying" he really means that they have a different opinion to himself.
So, when Lefty levels that accusation he is himself lying.
Hmmm... "Lying Lefty". Has a ring to it, don't you think?
So for instance when I posted out that Sir kier had no involvement in the Savile case was just my opinion and not Based on fact. And you call me a lier lol . You are a liar. And you reinforce it with every post you make. |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jan 13, 2024 12:15:42 GMT
When Lefty says that someone else is "Lying" he really means that they have a different opinion to himself.
So, when Lefty levels that accusation he is himself lying.
Hmmm... "Lying Lefty". Has a ring to it, don't you think?
So for instance when I posted out that Sir kier had no involvement in the Savile case was just my opinion and not Based on fact. And you call me a lier lol . No lies , Sir Kneeler, the DPP, as big boss of the CPS was involved in not prosecuting Saville (and was in charge at the time of many CPS Post Office prosecutions) The buck stops with the boss |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 13, 2024 12:16:08 GMT
Oh my how many times have I for one posted evidence that Sir Kier wasn't involved in the Savile case . But you keep constantly lying saying he was and the nourmous times you been corrected by other posters . Point out the 'lies'.
Was the Jimmy Saville case a cover-up?
The BBC said no evidence of misconduct by Savile had been found, denying there had been a cover-up of his activities. But rumours of Savile's sex crimes had circulated for years, yet no one dared print them. In a TV documentary presented by Louis Theroux in April 2000, Savile denied rumours about him being a paedophile. Eight years later Savile started legal proceedings against a newspaper linking him to abuse at the Jersey children's home Haut de la Garenne. Then in 2009 Savile was interviewed under caution by Surrey police investigating an alleged indecent assault at Duncroft school - the case was dropped as there was insufficient evidence to take any further action
Starmer, who was director of public prosecutions between 2008 and 2013, addressed questions about what he knew about up to 38 prosecutions of post office operators initiated by the CP
* Explain how Starmer could not be involved with Savile/Post Office scandal he was DPP in 2009?
You are a LIAR.
I'm a lier yet your own post proved he wasn't involved Savile was interviewed under caution by Surrey police investigating an alleged indecent assault at Duncroft school[/b] - the case was dropped as there was insufficient evidence to take any further action[ How on earth can any DPP Bring charges when there insufficient evidence to bring Charges . I'm sure your aware the DPP. Will only Bring prosecution if there possible chance of Conviction rate. And if you want to talk about Failer. In the DPP service look at today's record low rate of Conviction in Rape or the Aqitted cases because not enough evidence. You persistent lies in this matter his making you look a Clown to anyone with decent Morals on this Board. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 13, 2024 12:19:13 GMT
So for instance when I posted out that Sir kier had no involvement in the Savile case was just my opinion and not Based on fact. And you call me a lier lol . No lies , Sir Kneeler, the DPP, as big boss of the CPS was involved in not prosecuting Saville The buck stops with the boss [br? Ha ha more knonsence from a right winger Are you a Supporter of Boris Johnson by any Chance if so that explains a lot.. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 13, 2024 12:22:40 GMT
No lies , Sir Kneeler, the DPP, as big boss of the CPS was involved in not prosecuting Saville The buck stops with the boss [br? Ha ha more knonsence from a right winger Are you a Supporter of Boris Johnson by any Chance if so that explains a lot.. You are Big Fat Liar if you say the Savile case never got to Starmer, a high profile 'celebrity' like Jimmy Savile will 110% landed on Starmer's desk.
He was FULLY aware of Savile when he was questioned under caution by Surrey Police in 2009, why are you lying, and why are you so desperate to cover up Starmer's failings?
|
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jan 13, 2024 12:33:15 GMT
No lies , Sir Kneeler, the DPP, as big boss of the CPS was involved in not prosecuting Saville The buck stops with the boss [br? Ha ha more knonsence from a right winger Are you a Supporter of Boris Johnson by any Chance if so that explains a lot.. Are you denying the fact that Sir Keir Starmer (aka Sir Kneeler/special pension rules just for him etc) was DPP at the relevant time of the CPS failed to prosecute Saville? Are you aware (obviously not so its a rhetorical question) that the DPP is the boss of the CPS ,( which authorises criminal prosecutions) , so is responsible for all work of the CPS. The buck always stops with the boss As an aside if you do not accept the above facts Do you honestly believe that in the event of a potential very serious criminal charge against a household name , very famous, celebrity the decision is not referred to the boss and at no time passed across his desk? To remind you The buck always stops with the boss |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 13, 2024 12:33:37 GMT
No lies , Sir Kneeler, the DPP, as big boss of the CPS was involved in not prosecuting Saville The buck stops with the boss [br? Ha ha more knonsence from a right winger Are you a Supporter of Boris Johnson by any Chance if so that explains a lot.. Are you the missing link lefty old bean? You ain't human and that's for sure. |
|
