|
Post by see2 on Jan 9, 2024 19:17:18 GMT
What is needed is for the NHS to run properly and efficiently with a war on waste ,bring everything from patient care to building maintenance back in house and make people responsible for running good departments within budget . At present there are too many people rewarded for failure . Large numbers of people have careers that rely wholly on the waste and so it's a massive and intractable political problem. The private sector solves the corruption problem through competition / bankruptcy / threat of total failure. There isn't a public sector equivalent of that threat. If the health of the nation is passed to the private sector it would surely create a two tier system with the bottom tier receiving a lesser quality of health care. If I understand it correctly Starmer is intent on using some of the private sector for the benefit of the NHS. IMO he needs to be given the chance.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 9, 2024 19:33:52 GMT
Large numbers of people have careers that rely wholly on the waste and so it's a massive and intractable political problem. The private sector solves the corruption problem through competition / bankruptcy / threat of total failure. There isn't a public sector equivalent of that threat. If the health of the nation is passed to the private sector it would surely create a two tier system with the bottom tier receiving a lesser quality of health care. If I understand it correctly Starmer is intent on using some of the private sector for the benefit of the NHS. IMO he needs to be given the chance. Has much I like starmer don't think he should go further down the private road. The private care system only take on what they can make money on . And Basically the patient comes Second
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jan 9, 2024 20:12:31 GMT
I am very aware, we are all aware that the NHS is seen as a sacred cow that must never be changed and have more and more cash thrown at it even though it never seems to make a difference. I don't know whether privatisation is the answer but it must be obvious that something has to change, especially when you read headlines like this... Failing NHS trust sent 14 staff on a £58,000 jolly to Las Vegas A failing NHS trust has been accused of "slapping taxpayers in the face" after it blew £58,000 sending 14 members of staff on a trip to Las Vegas. The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS trust is rated as "requires improvement" overall by the care regulator and ended last year with a deficit of £13million. The trust's leadership also received the same "requires improvement" rating - link
Could privatisation really be any worse than what we have now? Better to die waiting for the treatment than to die unable to pay for it I have used ‘private’ medicine by paying (about £100) to see a consultant and thus skip the thousands in the queue to see the same man through the NHS without paying that bribe As they themselves said ‘You need an operation. You can have that here any day you like from tomorrow at a cost of £3500, or you can have it in eight weeks time in one of the two NHS hospitals at which i work under the NHS for free, with the option of paying £75 a night for a private room at one of them I actually took the last option because i had some paperwork to finalise for the VAT Man, which i did get done, and Moira pisted off for me, but after coming round in post op i overheard a conversation between two of the nursing staff pondering how the hell to sort out the post-operative needs of someone who needed a piece of kit larger than there was space available to accommodate in a standard ward bay. I don’t think they were really expecting me to say ‘that’s dead easy to solve put me in the ward where they were going and give him my side room ……. The one time i had ‘private medical insurance’ was while at Barclays Bank during the sub prime mortgage boom and collapse. It coincided with my injuring my Achilles Tendon. Within six weeks the entire outpatient appointment allowance of the policy was consumed and continuing the treatment cost me another £2000 Which was just affordable on my £43,000 salary while at the bank in 2008. Had the problem arisen after i was made redundant from there post the crash and been stupid enough to take Logica’s similar package while being paid a piss poor £32,000 to sort out the CAA’s four biggest IT disasters while being told to set them up to pay for about a million quids worth of non contractual extras, i would have been bankrupted Today at my current position at a challenger bank on almost £50k i was offered, when i started the job, their private medical package. I declined telling them the stress of not being able to pay the outpatient appointment bills when the payment limit was exceeded while under the Barclays scheme almost certainly contributed to my second clinical death after i was made redundant from them in the post sub mortgage crisis Last November an email went out from my current employer’s private health provider advising that anyone wishing to take out, or continue, the private cover should note the annual cost was quadrupling owing to a) the amount of use of the scheme and b) price rises imposed by the providers of the medical facilities. The NHS is burdened by many things But the british people need to be burdened with the private medical system in the same way they a dose of the clap and a bullet in the guts at the same time
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 9, 2024 22:34:54 GMT
If the health of the nation is passed to the private sector it would surely create a two tier system with the bottom tier receiving a lesser quality of health care. If I understand it correctly Starmer is intent on using some of the private sector for the benefit of the NHS. IMO he needs to be given the chance. Has much I like starmer don't think he should go further down the private road. The private care system only take on what they can make money on . And Basically the patient comes Second the patient comes second under the NHS - we just had a massive campaign for people to stay away and protect the NHS. I would prefer a health system where it is the patient that is protected and not the system..
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 10, 2024 0:17:18 GMT
Has much I like starmer don't think he should go further down the private road. The private care system only take on what they can make money on . And Basically the patient comes Second the patient comes second under the NHS - we just had a massive campaign for people to stay away and protect the NHS. I would prefer a health system where it is the patient that is protected and not the system.. Who lead that Campaign. Oh that's right the Nan facing a inquiry Iver the unessacemy deatha by his covid policy . He's Already admitted they got things wrong and should of done things differently. If he's found of wrong doing he should face Corporate manslaughter charges
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jan 10, 2024 1:41:56 GMT
Why couldn't it have been done online? I don’t know. Thars why I posted ‘ not necessarily’ rather than ‘ not’. Ive been to a few places to review machines that my company wanted to buy and tbh Zoom wouldn’t have cut it so I’m giving them the benefit of the doubt . Problem is that it was in Vegas and not a nondescript town abroad. I agree. And, as for Vegas, major trade shows tend to be held in major cities rather than nondescript towns.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jan 10, 2024 1:44:42 GMT
What is needed is for the NHS to run properly and efficiently with a war on waste ,bring everything from patient care to building maintenance back in house and make people responsible for running good departments within budget . At present there are too many people rewarded for failure . Large numbers of people have careers that rely wholly on the waste and so it's a massive and intractable political problem. The private sector solves the corruption problem through competition / bankruptcy / threat of total failure. There isn't a public sector equivalent of that threat. Waste certainly occurs in the public sector. However, one of the biggest inefficiencies in my department is caused by the absolute shiteness of one of our major private sector "Partners". And I would welcome bringing their services back in house. Indeed, one of my colleagues is a senior manager in an NHS trust and had the same situation. They found it cheaper and more efficient to bring certain maintenance tasks back in house rather than continuing to use the external contractor.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2024 2:09:14 GMT
I am very aware, we are all aware that the NHS is seen as a sacred cow that must never be changed and have more and more cash thrown at it even though it never seems to make a difference. I don't know whether privatisation is the answer but it must be obvious that something has to change, especially when you read headlines like this... Failing NHS trust sent 14 staff on a £58,000 jolly to Las Vegas A failing NHS trust has been accused of "slapping taxpayers in the face" after it blew £58,000 sending 14 members of staff on a trip to Las Vegas. The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS trust is rated as "requires improvement" overall by the care regulator and ended last year with a deficit of £13million. The trust's leadership also received the same "requires improvement" rating - link
Could privatisation really be any worse than what we have now?Experience with other privatisations clearly show that they often make things worse and not better. Part of the problem the NHS has is too much private sector involvement sucking money out of it already. Yes the NHS is failing badly in its current form, starved of the necessary funds and understaffed due to ever worsening real terms pay. It badly needs reform. Pay and recruitment needs to be looked at. We need fewer managers and more frontline staff. We need to train many more doctors and nurses and find ways to incentivise them working in the NHS. And when the entire NHS is on its knees, we should not be allowing managers to waste our money on shite. Someone needs to be empowered to rein that in. Some form of reform is necessary. But we should not equate reform with ever more marketisation and privatisation. Because what we will get is more pen pushers and bean counters paid for by more cuts to frontline staff on the name of "efficiency".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2024 2:12:52 GMT
Large numbers of people have careers that rely wholly on the waste and so it's a massive and intractable political problem. The private sector solves the corruption problem through competition / bankruptcy / threat of total failure. There isn't a public sector equivalent of that threat. If the health of the nation is passed to the private sector it would surely create a two tier system with the bottom tier receiving a lesser quality of health care. If I understand it correctly Starmer is intent on using some of the private sector for the benefit of the NHS. IMO he needs to be given the chance. His Shadow Health spokesman is in the pocket of private healthcare companies. The self serving bastards are in it for themselves. The private sector will seek to cream off the easy bits they can make money out of, leaving the core NHS in an even worse position to deal with all the serious shit. But I suppose that makes me a biased and immature hard lefty. lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2024 2:18:20 GMT
Large numbers of people have careers that rely wholly on the waste and so it's a massive and intractable political problem. The private sector solves the corruption problem through competition / bankruptcy / threat of total failure. There isn't a public sector equivalent of that threat. Waste certainly occurs in the public sector. However, one of the biggest inefficiencies in my department is caused by the absolute shiteness of one of our major private sector "Partners". And I would welcome bringing their services back in house. Indeed, one of my colleagues is a senior manager in an NHS trust and had the same situation. They found it cheaper and more efficient to bring certain maintenance tasks back in house rather than continuing to use the external contractor. Occasionally you can sound sensibly leftish when speaking from personal experience, ie real life.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jan 10, 2024 5:02:02 GMT
Waste certainly occurs in the public sector. However, one of the biggest inefficiencies in my department is caused by the absolute shiteness of one of our major private sector "Partners". And I would welcome bringing their services back in house. Indeed, one of my colleagues is a senior manager in an NHS trust and had the same situation. They found it cheaper and more efficient to bring certain maintenance tasks back in house rather than continuing to use the external contractor. Occasionally you can sound sensibly leftish when speaking from personal experience, ie real life. I mostly speak from real life, of which I have wide experience. It's why I'm so sensibly centrist.
|
|
|
Post by Cartertonian on Jan 10, 2024 7:44:24 GMT
It’s nice to see nearly two pages of relatively sober discussion on this, rather than the usual partisan mud-slinging. For me, I have always maintained that I don’t care how the NHS is funded as long as it remains universal in nature and we don’t end up with people being left bankrupt for the misfortune of ill health. 100%. Many of my former students feed back to me their frustration at not being able to deliver the high-quality, patient-centred care we teach them, due to lack of resources both in terms of medical equipment and staff. I was just leaving the NHS to go to MoD when these 'New Public Management' initiatives to devolve budgets down to ward and department level came in. Until then, all senior nurses had to concern themselves with was making sure that patients got the care they needed. The financial aspects of that care were for people in suits in the hospital HQ and it was their job to sort out. More egregious, however, was the tying of annual appraisal to budgetary management as a priority, in other words for senior clinical managers, patient care could go hang as long as you stayed within budget. I made the move to MoD at the right time. All the way up to my exit point in 2022, my role as a senior clinical manager was never fettered by a budget. My priority was always high-quality healthcare delivery, not keeping bean-counters happy. This does, however, impact on the quality of the service provided by private sector companies like Sodexho, ISS et al. Public sector contracts are reviewed every 5 years and every time they come up for renewal, government procurement rules require them to offer to the lowest bidder. As a result, the level and quality of service goes progressively down and down as each contract is renewed. I’ve seen it in both the NHS and the MoD. The other thing is that, as a manager, I could directly manage everyone on my team when all of them were in-house, whereas as soon as I was reliant on contractors I could do little to nothing about their poor work standards and attitude because they didn’t work for me. I had many a convoluted and extended phone/email conversation with some ‘manager’ hundreds of miles away, that inevitable failed to resolve the problem. New Public Management As an aside, we were only talking yesterday at work about how the quality and efficiency of our nurse training programme has been adversely affected by the nearly forty-year evolution of NPM principles. Now nursing is a degree programme, it has to be managed like any other degree, which means that the student is the 'customer'. BUT - and not just for nursing, but also all other AHP courses - we as nurse teachers are statutorily required to deliver what the Nursing and Midwifery Council tells us to deliver. So when bleating students whinge about their course and start waving their 'I'm paying nine and a half grand a year for this' card, that puts us in an invidious position. Our scores on things like the National Student Survey can be affected by our 'unresponsiveness' to student complaints, but there's fuck all we can do about it because we HAVE to deliver what our statutory governing body says we have to deliver, not deliver whatever the students' fancy.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 10, 2024 7:57:38 GMT
I am very aware, we are all aware that the NHS is seen as a sacred cow that must never be changed and have more and more cash thrown at it even though it never seems to make a difference. I don't know whether privatisation is the answer but it must be obvious that something has to change, especially when you read headlines like this... Failing NHS trust sent 14 staff on a £58,000 jolly to Las Vegas A failing NHS trust has been accused of "slapping taxpayers in the face" after it blew £58,000 sending 14 members of staff on a trip to Las Vegas. The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS trust is rated as "requires improvement" overall by the care regulator and ended last year with a deficit of £13million. The trust's leadership also received the same "requires improvement" rating - link
Could privatisation really be any worse than what we have now?Experience with other privatisations clearly show that they often make things worse and not better. Part of the problem the NHS has is too much private sector involvement sucking money out of it already. Yes the NHS is failing badly in its current form, starved of the necessary funds and understaffed due to ever worsening real terms pay. It badly needs reform. Pay and recruitment needs to be looked at. We need fewer managers and more frontline staff. We need to train many more doctors and nurses and find ways to incentivise them working in the NHS. And when the entire NHS is on its knees, we should not be allowing managers to waste our money on shite. Someone needs to be empowered to rein that in. Some form of reform is necessary. But we should not equate reform with ever more marketisation and privatisation. Because what we will get is more pen pushers and bean counters paid for by more cuts to frontline staff on the name of "efficiency". So basically the same as we have been doing for the past 75 years - shovel ever larger sums of money into it and 'reform' it every couple of years.. The British way - bumble along in gentle decline...
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jan 10, 2024 7:59:59 GMT
As an aside, we were only talking yesterday at work about how the quality and efficiency of our nurse training programme has been adversely affected by the nearly forty-year evolution of NPM principles. Now nursing is a degree programme, it has to be managed like any other degree, which means that the student is the 'customer'. BUT - and not just for nursing, but also all other AHP courses - we as nurse teachers are statutorily required to deliver what the Nursing and Midwifery Council tells us to deliver. So when bleating students whinge about their course and start waving their 'I'm paying nine and a half grand a year for this' card, that puts us in an invidious position. Our scores on things like the National Student Survey can be affected by our 'unresponsiveness' to student complaints, but there's fuck all we can do about it because we HAVE to deliver what our statutory governing body says we have to deliver, not deliver whatever the students' fancy. I can relate to that but the other way round. I work for a private contractor, but back in lockdown one 2020 we got seconded to training Universal Credit for the DWP. We had to deliver the DWP training materials in the DWP format and it was absolutely horrendous, just reading stuff out to groups of 25, little interactivity and no live experience. Just awful. Totally agreed with the complaints, but we had no say in it.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 10, 2024 8:09:40 GMT
If the health of the nation is passed to the private sector it would surely create a two tier system with the bottom tier receiving a lesser quality of health care. If I understand it correctly Starmer is intent on using some of the private sector for the benefit of the NHS. IMO he needs to be given the chance. Has much I like starmer don't think he should go further down the private road. The private care system only take on what they can make money on . And Basically the patient comes Second I agree with you to a large extent, but an agreement between the Government/NHS and the private sector would not be helpful to the NHS if the private sector were to charge unacceptably high charges for their services. Such an agreement would bring in more work for the private sector which would need to be taken into consideration before an agreement could be made. IIRC, Starmer has already suggested that one particular type of operation could be handed over to the private sector, if the move was beneficial to the NHS. Such a move would help the NHS by reducing waiting times for other operations within the NHS. If such a move created extra costs for the NHS then it might be beneficial for a limited period only, in order to reduce waiting times for NHS operations.
|
|