|
|
Post by Steve on Nov 29, 2022 19:56:53 GMT
I suggest you use a straight bat in future I've done nothing but tell the truth here. I'm not in favour racial discriminatory law and I find it a bit odd that who feels racial discrimination should be a crime, is, or could be. Your truth Which as I said is to oppose any initiative to combat racial discrimination if it in any way inconveniences white people. There are higher moral grounds, millions of them. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 29, 2022 20:02:50 GMT
What a completely ridiculous misinterpretation of reality. Caused by your previously apparently posted racism. ?? Is the premier league not over 40% BAME and where was the previous apparently posted racism? I have no idea what "previously apparently posted racism" you are referring to. You're talking footballers on the one hand while the debate is about police recruits on the other. Football players of all colour are selected on their ability. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 29, 2022 20:05:47 GMT
When a so called wrong is designed to decrease a wrong that already exist it is a benefit not a wrong. Huh? So if you have had a tenner stolen off you it is just fine and dandy to steal a fiver off someone else to lessen your loss making your second theft a benefit. Your comment is completely out of context, so your reply only makes any sense if you are acting the fool. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 29, 2022 20:08:35 GMT
No. But if you stole from me I might want what you took given to my children rather than yours. You might want a lot of things . Discrimination against white people is still a racist and immoral act . If you stole from me and gave to your children it would be unfair that they should suffer for your crime. But it would be more unfair that my children should suffer from your crime. Shame your argument ran out and you were forced to start from scratch. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 29, 2022 20:12:07 GMT
Absolutely correct, that is why the Practice of giving white people preference over equally qualified coloured people is racist and needed to be addressed. It cannot be addressed by discriminating against white people. If in this situation coloured people can be discriminated against, why can't white people be discriminated against? |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 29, 2022 20:15:53 GMT
Yes you do precisely that. If the Met are 99% white and the London population is 80% white. You need to address that. I know there's rarely a way to be absolutely fair, all you can do is get fairer. Why do you need to address that? The premier league is about 40% BAME players do we need to address that or do the supporters not worry about to whom they give their support. Do we need to get fairer in football? Because football has little effect on how people live, and football does not have a recent history of favouring people for their skin colour. They cleaned up their game and can now promote purely on quality. You'd have thought the latest damning report on the London fire brigade might give you pause for thought. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 29, 2022 20:15:59 GMT
When a so called wrong is designed to decrease a wrong that already exist it is a benefit not a wrong. No it’s not. You either condemn racial discrimination or you condone it . Discrimination against white people is as morally wrong as discrimination against any other racial group. The solution is to address the problem from the source , not repeat it . The source is deemed to be the uneven handed racist selection existing in the first place. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 29, 2022 20:18:46 GMT
No it’s not. You either condemn racial discrimination or you condone it . Discrimination against white people is as morally wrong as discrimination against any other racial group. The solution is to address the problem from the source , not repeat it . The source is deemed to be the uneven handed racist selection existing in the first place. The source is the racists that need correcting , including the ones who want to repeat it . |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 29, 2022 20:20:36 GMT
It cannot be addressed by discriminating against white people. If in this situation coloured people can be discriminated against, why can't white people be discriminated against? Coloured ( sic) people shouldn’t be discriminated against . The solution is to address that , not apply it to another racial group. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 29, 2022 20:21:41 GMT
Absolutely correct, that is why the Practice of giving white people preference over equally qualified coloured people is racist and needed to be addressed. Apparently they cannot find the equally qualified BAME candidates even when making special efforts so perhaps to have police we take those available and are qualified and not worry about proportionality. The problem was apparently exposed by capable and qualified BAME applicants being denied access to the force. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 29, 2022 20:24:06 GMT
If in this situation coloured people can be discriminated against, why can't white people be discriminated against? Coloured ( sic) people shouldn’t be discriminated against . The solution is to address that , not apply it to another racial group. I note you avoided the question. So how would you address "that" problem? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 29, 2022 20:28:53 GMT
The source is deemed to be the uneven handed racist selection existing in the first place. The source is the racists that need correcting , including the ones who want to repeat it . Your post doesn't make much sense, I think the problem is that your bias has overwhelmed your logic. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 29, 2022 20:32:00 GMT
The source is the racists that need correcting , including the ones who want to repeat it . Your post doesn't make much sense, I think the problem is that your bias has overwhelmed your logic. It makes perfect sense .Your problem is that your bias has overwhelmed whatever intellectual capacity that you retained. See I can do that too. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 29, 2022 20:34:05 GMT
The source is the racists that need correcting , including the ones who want to repeat it . Your post doesn't make much sense, I think the problem is that your bias has overwhelmed your logic. Have you not noticed he's lost and reset? All you need to do is provide a link back to the start. 😉 |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 29, 2022 20:35:06 GMT
Coloured ( sic) people shouldn’t be discriminated against . The solution is to address that , not apply it to another racial group. I note you avoided the question. So how would you address "that" problem? I note that you avoided the answer . If it’s beyond the wit of man to find a solution to discrimination by rooting it out and correcting it then we will be damned to no solution at all. Discrimination against one group to solve discrimination by another is not a solution. |
|
