|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 3, 2024 17:11:59 GMT
It was a 'joint enterprise' ...
"They were convicted under the law of joint enterprise, which allows for an accused person to be convicted even if they did not inflict the fatal blow. For the case to be proven against them, the prosecution must only satisfy jurors the accused had foreseen the possibility of a crime being committed".
**By no means am I holding Blair solely responsible for both UK/US soliders deaths.
It was a Blair/Bush joint enterprise, Bush could not have pushed the war through without out the backing of the UK government and Blair, a war based on lies, at least we knew Saddam Hussien and Bin Laden were tyrants, but at least we knew where we stood with them.
Bush/Blair were far worse, we are still picking up the pieces from these two 'tyrants', Free as birds, at least Bush keeps his head down and we only have to see him at Presidential ceremonies, as for Blair this tyrant knows no bounds, he's pure bad, bad to the bone.
What on earth you on about Bush/Blair Wasnt convicted of Anything And lets face it Blair prevented the war for several months. But the mad man Shaddam kept waving his saber about and chucking the UN weapons Inspectors out . Has for war Crinminal are you forgetting The Aliaied forces found Thousands of Mass Graves with Hundreds of Body's in them Saddam was a Evil Tyrant. And do you remember how the Iraqi people Partied and toppled Saddams Statue .sad Like I said have you any Morals man Last time I'm responding to you, because I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you are actually 'clueless' on the illegal invasion of Iraq.
Bush/Blair were never convicted of war crimes because the establishment covered their backs.
I don't even think you know the reason Bush/Blair declared war, their reason being they were looking for WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction), ...do you know that?
Not once have you mentioned the reason for declaring war on Iraq, so we can only assume you don't actually know that, and as for 'Saddam waving his saber about'... I am going to be polite with you, because you are just naive and not malicious, but you really do need to go and study this subject, because you are well out of your depth on this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 3, 2024 17:42:46 GMT
What on earth you on about Bush/Blair Wasnt convicted of Anything And lets face it Blair prevented the war for several months. But the mad man Shaddam kept waving his saber about and chucking the UN weapons Inspectors out . Has for war Crinminal are you forgetting The Aliaied forces found Thousands of Mass Graves with Hundreds of Body's in them Saddam was a Evil Tyrant. And do you remember how the Iraqi people Partied and toppled Saddams Statue .sad Like I said have you any Morals man Last time I'm responding to you, because I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you are actually 'clueless' on the illegal invasion of Iraq.
Bush/Blair were never convicted of war crimes because the establishment covered their backs.
I don't even think you know the reason Bush/Blair declared war, their reason being they were looking for WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction), ...do you know that?
Not once have you mentioned the reason for declaring war on Iraq, so we can only assume you don't actually know that, and as for 'Saddam waving his saber about'... I am going to be polite with you, because you are just naive and not malicious, but you really do need to go and study this subject, because you are well out of your depth on this one.
Of course I'm aware why We went to war in Iraq. If you know so much on the Subject you Know Blair acted on Intelligence . What our Intelligence Services said was reliable . He admitted during inquiry that he should of looked into the intelligence Source more but took our intelligence services at there word. Think you need to think Straight because you're letting your hatred of the left Cloud your judgement. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 3, 2024 17:53:23 GMT
Last time I'm responding to you, because I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you are actually 'clueless' on the illegal invasion of Iraq.
Bush/Blair were never convicted of war crimes because the establishment covered their backs.
I don't even think you know the reason Bush/Blair declared war, their reason being they were looking for WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction), ...do you know that?
Not once have you mentioned the reason for declaring war on Iraq, so we can only assume you don't actually know that, and as for 'Saddam waving his saber about'... I am going to be polite with you, because you are just naive and not malicious, but you really do need to go and study this subject, because you are well out of your depth on this one.
Of course I'm aware why We went to war in Iraq. If you know so much on the Subject you Know Blair acted on Intelligence . What our Intelligence Services said was reliable . He admitted during inquiry that he should of looked into the intelligence Source more but took our intelligence services at there word. Think you need to think Straight because you're letting your hatred of the left Cloud your judgement. I haven't got a 'hatred of the left', there have been, and are lots on the left who are decent people, I don't stereotype lefties.
Intelligence sources have to be 100% reliable when you are declaring full scale war on a country, Blair saying he 'should of looked into the intelligence sources more'.. is even more insulting and outrageous to the families of soldiers lost in that illegal war.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 3, 2024 17:53:59 GMT
His second in command crawled out from uder a rock. Bet you feel that about All women Nope only slags. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 3, 2024 18:12:59 GMT
Yes and guess which one is the middle class.... Sir Starmer Stammer was form a working class background Who Done very well for himself ah, the benefits of a private education..  |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 3, 2024 18:16:00 GMT
Stammer was form a working class background Who Done very well for himself ah, the benefits of a private education.. LOL.... |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 3, 2024 18:23:19 GMT
Stammer was form a working class background Who Done very well for himself ah, the benefits of a private education.. Yes of course like any parent they wanted the best for there Child. He obviously was a very intelligent lad For him to pass the Grammar school Exam |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 3, 2024 18:26:32 GMT
Bet you feel that about All women Nope only slags. Like I said bet you feel that about all woman. And that a very Slanderous comment I'm sure there a Rule against such Slander on this Forum. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2024 18:28:49 GMT
Like I said bet you feel that about all woman. And that a very Slanderous comment I'm sure there a Rule against such Slander on this Forum. It's libel when it's written. You are the one smearing Jonksy. Jonksy hasn't libelled anyone. If you want rules that ban people for holding opinions you disagree with then post them on feedback.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 3, 2024 18:29:59 GMT
Like I said bet you feel that about all woman. And that a very Slanderous comment I'm sure there a Rule against such Slander on this Forum. Most women leave school with more qaulifications than kids, lefty old bean.... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2024 18:32:43 GMT
Yes and guess which one is the middle class.... Sir Starmer Stammer was form a working class background Who Done very well for himself Not like Johnson the Snob who has a silver spoon in his mouth Starmer is about as working class as a detached house in leafy suburbia. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 3, 2024 18:37:00 GMT
Like I said bet you feel that about all woman. And that a very Slanderous comment I'm sure there a Rule against such Slander on this Forum. It's libel when it's written. You are the one smearing Jonksy. Jonksy hasn't libelled anyone. If you want rules that ban people for holding opinions you disagree with then post them on feedback.
How on earth am I smearing Jonsky If it libel when it's written Havent you seen what he Writen about Angela. He called her a S and your saying that's not libellous. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 3, 2024 18:39:33 GMT
Stammer was form a working class background Who Done very well for himself Not like Johnson the Snob who has a silver spoon in his mouth Starmer is about as working class as a detached house in leafy suburbia. And what CorbYn was working class. Lol. Have you forgot the Working class turned there back on mass twice. Especially the last GE What was the Election result Worst results for labour in 30+ Years . |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 3, 2024 18:41:23 GMT
ah, the benefits of a private education.. Yes of course like any parent they wanted the best for there Child. He obviously was a very intelligent lad For him to pass the Grammar school Exam ... go to RGS, a league table-topping £22,995-a-year private school in the Surrey commuter belt. Ah - the privations of the horny-handed sons of toil.. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 3, 2024 18:41:48 GMT
It's libel when it's written. You are the one smearing Jonksy. Jonksy hasn't libelled anyone. If you want rules that ban people for holding opinions you disagree with then post them on feedback.
How on earth am I smearing Jonsky If it libel when it's written Havent you seen what he Writen about Angela. He called her a S and your saying that's not libellous. Angela Rayner has been having a affair with a married man, not to mention she is also married so there is no 'libel' because it's the 'truth'.
"LIBEL' a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation.
It is not 'false' Angela Rayner is a 'mistress', no ifs no buts ........... FACT.
|
|
