|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 11, 2023 10:33:38 GMT
A biological male can be defined as a woman because a 13 year old was defined as a man in ‘ some societies’ ….yet genocide requires mass graves to be defined as ‘ genocide’. Yes folks , his logic is as daft as that . A 'biological male' is a woman if she fits the definitional requirement of a woman within a given group. If you and other members of the far-right continue to use the word genocide in the way you do, then that is what genocide will become within far-right circles. That will be the meaning of the word. But you might like to be clear that your definition of genocide is a world apart from the normally accepted understanding of the word. Nobody who supports transgender rights claims that our society has always defined women in the way that is now gaining traction. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Dec 11, 2023 10:36:55 GMT
Yes you have. You also claim he should have exclusive rights to ladies safe spaces and services. Start a new thread on that topic if you like. I will only deal with it briefly here. We don't claim that a transgender woman is a woman by your definition. If your definition of a woman requires a woman to have a womb, then there is no way somebody who doesn't have a womb can be a woman if your definition is used. You're not a mod, so refrain from giving orders, thanks. This thread isn't about genocide it's about the fundamental interest of the English people. It has run its course and now you've hijacked it arguing the toss over defintions. So, I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy. |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Dec 11, 2023 10:41:25 GMT
Would you agree that policies aimed (partially or not) at reducing the total number , or total democratic influence, of a particular ethnic group have a genocidal intent? By the same token, would it not be correct (pedantry aside) to state that a policy can have a genocidal effect without there necessarily being a genocidal intent?
A recent example could be the expulsion of Chagossians from Diego Garcia, which has been widely denounced in liberal circles as a cultural genocide, if not a racial one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 11, 2023 10:42:00 GMT
Start a new thread on that topic if you like. I will only deal with it briefly here. We don't claim that a transgender woman is a woman by your definition. If your definition of a woman requires a woman to have a womb, then there is no way somebody who doesn't have a womb can be a woman if your definition is used. You're not a mod, so refrain from giving orders, thanks. This thread isn't about genocide it's about the fundamental interest of the English people. It has run its course and now you've hijacked it arguing the toss over defintions. So, I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy. I invited you to start a new thread. There were no orders. I haven't hijacked anything. The conversation turned to the meaning of Britishness and the ethnic English. My contribution had a direct bearing. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Dec 11, 2023 10:44:12 GMT
You're not a mod, so refrain from giving orders, thanks. This thread isn't about genocide it's about the fundamental interest of the English people. It has run its course and now you've hijacked it arguing the toss over defintions. So, I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy. I invited you start a new thread. There were no orders, Bubs. Okay wormy. Continue with your hijacking of this thread, and linguistic gymnastics of the English language. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Dec 11, 2023 10:45:27 GMT
You're not a mod, so refrain from giving orders, thanks. This thread isn't about genocide it's about the fundamental interest of the English people. It has run its course and now you've hijacked it arguing the toss over defintions. So, I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy. I invited you to start a new thread. There were no orders, Bubs. I haven't hijacked anything. The conversation turned to the meaning of Britishness and the ethnic English. My contribution had a direct bearing. Then my contribution had direct meaning to your linguistic and mental gymnastics. You are, after all, hung up on the definition of ONE word. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 11, 2023 10:45:54 GMT
I invited you start a new thread. There were no orders, Bubs. Okay wormy. Continue with your hijacking of this thread, and linguistic gymnastics of the English language. Seeing that the thread has a linguistic theme (what is Britishness?), I'll be more than happy to do just that. It'll be interesting to see how the mods react to your use of the word wormy in the Mind Zone. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 11, 2023 10:46:12 GMT
I invited you to start a new thread. There were no orders, Bubs. I haven't hijacked anything. The conversation turned to the meaning of Britishness and the ethnic English. My contribution had a direct bearing. Then my contribution had direct meaning to your linguistic and mental gymnastics. You are, after all, hung up on the definition of ONE word. Two words now. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Dec 11, 2023 10:47:37 GMT
Okay wormy. Continue with your hijacking of this thread, and linguistic gymnastics of the English language. Seeing that the thread has a linguistic theme (what is Britishness?), I'll be more than happy to do just that. It'll be interesting to see how the mods react to your use of the word wormy in the Mind Zone. Probably the same amount who see how you use the word "Bubs". You went first. I responded in kind. Best get lobbying though. I don't identify as Bubs, wormy. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 11, 2023 10:48:56 GMT
Seeing that the thread has a linguistic theme (what is Britishness?), I'll be more than happy to do just that. It'll be interesting to see how the mods react to your use of the word wormy in the Mind Zone. Probably the same amount who see how you use the word "Bubs". You went first. I responded in kind. Best get lobbying though. I don't identify as Bubs, wormy. That's a term of endearment.  |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Dec 11, 2023 10:51:27 GMT
Probably the same amount who see how you use the word "Bubs". You went first. I responded in kind. Best get lobbying though. I don't identify as Bubs, wormy. That's a term of endearment, Bubs. So is wormy, for you, wormy. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 11, 2023 10:53:50 GMT
That's a term of endearment, Bubs. So is wormy, for you, wormy. The B word has been removed. You know what you have to do. |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Dec 11, 2023 10:54:01 GMT
"Seeing that the thread has a linguistic theme (what is Britishness?)..."
Englishness, and the theme is an ethnic one not a linguistic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 11, 2023 10:55:18 GMT
"Seeing that the thread has a linguistic theme (what is Britishness?)..." Englishness, and the theme is an ethnic one not a linguistic. No, it's not. It's linguistic. English and British are identifiers, a part of language. |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Dec 11, 2023 11:15:59 GMT
Since I started the thread, I think I am entitled to decide what its theme is intended to be, your semantic gymnastics notwithstanding.
|
|
