|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Nov 13, 2023 9:12:30 GMT
Don't forget the little knives they're also allowed to carry.
|
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 13, 2023 9:30:09 GMT
Don't forget the little knives they're also allowed to carry. Ooh yes, the turban wars with the little knives. Are these the knives they used in the ethnic cleansing? |
|
|
|
Post by dappy on Nov 13, 2023 9:41:10 GMT
If only the taxi licensing authorities in Shropshire had allowed a Union Jack on one cabs bonnet and all of these “problems” would have paled into insignificance…… Its fodder for the racists Dappy. It feeds the narrative they pedal, that we are being usurped. Frankly its wrong on two levels. 1,Councils should not be telling private companies what advertising/logos etc they can have at all. Planning offices telling my company what our colour scheme should be in each town we trade in, is ridiculous when they can't even keep the streets clean. 2, The British flag is something we should be proud of whether we hail from Bolton or Botswana, anybody who thinks that's offensive should genuinely piss off out of our country. Can you imagine ANY other country following that lead on appeasement. That the council don't wish to have to argue what is distasteful and therefore blanket ban all signage is lazy and harmful. I have to say I wondered if your response was some sort of reaction to conflict between your business and a local authority. Dan has rather moved this thread on with bringing up the great Wolverhampton Turban wars issue and its shocking airbrushing by the wokerati from its rightful place leading our history syllabus in our schools but in answer to your points 1) Sorry no. Planning rules do have a role in protecting our towns and cities character from private companies private interests. Whether they have applied that correctly in your companies case, I can't obviously say. 2) The taxi licensing rules in Shropshire were entirely uncontroversial until one bloke wanted to be different and the tabloid media chose it as that days outrage story. Nobody is suggesting the Union Jack is offensive or the french flag or polish flag come to that. They just want uniformity. Don't get con ned by the tabloids exploitation of non-storys to control their silo. |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Nov 13, 2023 9:53:54 GMT
The most recent schools census published in June shows that white British children are now a minority in 44 out of 159 local authorities in England.
They form less that 75% of school enrolment in a further 45 local authorities, including formerly hideously white Cambridgeshire where 30% of schoolchildren are now not white British.
Zany's 'tiny dots' are growing into mega-blobs as we watch.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Nov 13, 2023 9:56:15 GMT
dappy sez: "The taxi licensing rules in Shropshire were entirely uncontroversial ... "
So were the uniform rules for bus drivers in Wolverhampton, which the Sikh in question agreed to in writing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2023 12:48:53 GMT
Its fodder for the racists Dappy. It feeds the narrative they pedal, that we are being usurped. But you can't actually address anything without resorting to screaming racist or reporting people after you've been smearing other members. Perhaps this is intelligence in Zanyworld, but in the real world I am seeing evidence that you're supporting a form of forced race replacement and NOT diversity.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Nov 13, 2023 23:44:13 GMT
Its fodder for the racists Dappy. It feeds the narrative they pedal, that we are being usurped. But you can't actually address anything without resorting to screaming racist or reporting people after you've been smearing other members. Perhaps this is intelligence in Zanyworld, but in the real world I am seeing evidence that you're supporting a form of forced race replacement and NOT diversity.
Can we call Dr finetush for you? he is very good you know. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 14, 2023 7:39:28 GMT
Its fodder for the racists Dappy. It feeds the narrative they pedal, that we are being usurped. Frankly its wrong on two levels. 1,Councils should not be telling private companies what advertising/logos etc they can have at all. Planning offices telling my company what our colour scheme should be in each town we trade in, is ridiculous when they can't even keep the streets clean. 2, The British flag is something we should be proud of whether we hail from Bolton or Botswana, anybody who thinks that's offensive should genuinely piss off out of our country. Can you imagine ANY other country following that lead on appeasement. That the council don't wish to have to argue what is distasteful and therefore blanket ban all signage is lazy and harmful. I have to say I wondered if your response was some sort of reaction to conflict between your business and a local authority. Dan has rather moved this thread on with bringing up the great Wolverhampton Turban wars issue and its shocking airbrushing by the wokerati from its rightful place leading our history syllabus in our schools but in answer to your points 1) Sorry no. Planning rules do have a role in protecting our towns and cities character from private companies private interests. Whether they have applied that correctly in your companies case, I can't obviously say. 2) The taxi licensing rules in Shropshire were entirely uncontroversial until one bloke wanted to be different and the tabloid media chose it as that days outrage story. Nobody is suggesting the Union Jack is offensive or the french flag or polish flag come to that. They just want uniformity. Don't get con ned by the tabloids exploitation of non-storys to control their silo. 1, To a certain extent yes, but I was talking about the amount of say they want rather than a right to say. Perhaps other examples might do better, like the council that will only give planning permission for the sort of business that they think the town needs. Or the one that will only give planning permission if the property is in the town centre, because their town centre is dying because of all the traffic restrictions etc they put in place. These two examples lead my company to abandon said towns completely. 2, But in these times when a sizeable chunk of the population are open to the suggestion that they are being disenfranchised, do you think banning the British flag was a sensible thing to do? If said council had banned Turbans because them's the rules, would you have taken the same stance you are with this? That rules are rules and it shouldn't be a problem? |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 14, 2023 7:52:24 GMT
The most recent schools census published in June shows that white British children are now a minority in 44 out of 159 local authorities in England. They form less that 75% of school enrolment in a further 45 local authorities, including formerly hideously white Cambridgeshire where 30% of schoolchildren are now not white British. Zany's 'tiny dots' are growing into mega-blobs as we watch. Well now you are trying to conflate "A minority" I.E less that 50% with "Ethnic cleansing" In Rwanda we didn't cry Ethnic cleansing because the Hutu had slightly more people in certain areas than the Tutsi. So in essence removing the provocative terms we are down to 25% of local authorities in the UK have slightly more non whites than whites. To which my answer is as usual, so what? I have a business in Leicester its customers are mainly Asian. They are no different to anyone else. None have turned up demanding we change to suit Sharia law or any such daftness. In fact the only amusing story I could give you was a Jewish group who insisted our female staff could not be present while they ate. I would love at some point to drill down with you exactly what your objections are to this change in our population mix. Is it just you don't like change? |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 14, 2023 7:54:28 GMT
The most recent schools census published in June shows that white British children are now a minority in 44 out of 159 local authorities in England. They form less that 75% of school enrolment in a further 45 local authorities, including formerly hideously white Cambridgeshire where 30% of schoolchildren are now not white British. Zany's 'tiny dots' are growing into mega-blobs as we watch. Well now you are trying to conflate "A minority" I.E less that 50% with "Ethnic cleansing" In Rwanda we didn't cry Ethnic cleansing because the Hutu had slightly more people in certain areas than the Tutsi. So in essence removing the provocative terms we are down to 25% of local authorities in the UK have slightly more non whites than whites. To which my answer is as usual, so what? I have a business in Leicester its customers are mainly Asian. They are no different to anyone else. None have turned up demanding we change to suit Sharia law or any such daftness. In fact the only amusing story I could give you was a Jewish group who insisted our female staff could not be present while they ate. I would love at some point to drill down with you exactly what your objections are to this change in our population mix. Is it just you don't like change? Is the country better for it? |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 14, 2023 8:13:53 GMT
Well now you are trying to conflate "A minority" I.E less that 50% with "Ethnic cleansing" In Rwanda we didn't cry Ethnic cleansing because the Hutu had slightly more people in certain areas than the Tutsi. So in essence removing the provocative terms we are down to 25% of local authorities in the UK have slightly more non whites than whites. To which my answer is as usual, so what? I have a business in Leicester its customers are mainly Asian. They are no different to anyone else. None have turned up demanding we change to suit Sharia law or any such daftness. In fact the only amusing story I could give you was a Jewish group who insisted our female staff could not be present while they ate. I would love at some point to drill down with you exactly what your objections are to this change in our population mix. Is it just you don't like change? Is the country better for it? Hard to say. The country is not static, it changes constantly, there are so many factors to consider. Firstly you would have to decide what you mean by better. Second, whether a decreasing population would be better than one changing colour. Third, what improvements or losses are due to the change. Fourth, are you discussing population change or population growth? Your simply question hides a very complex answer |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 14, 2023 8:24:28 GMT
We are obviously talking about the demographics of population change - has massively increasing the size of the ethnic minority communities led to improved social cohesion and wellbeing for the entire population?.
Changes in the size of the population is a different question altogether.
|
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 14, 2023 8:31:20 GMT
We are obviously talking about the demographics of population change - has massively increasing the size of the ethnic minority communities led to improved social cohesion and wellbeing for the entire population?. Changes in the size of the population is a different question altogether. Well from my point of view I see no real change to how I live my life, purely from those changes. Some minor down sides, some minor upsides. But why are you asking me, give your opinion and evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 14, 2023 8:36:10 GMT
I would have to add. Population size has to be part of the picture because had we not introduced any migrants to our country then our population would have shrunk considerably by now and that in itself has effects on the cohesion and well being of the population.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Nov 14, 2023 9:04:44 GMT
I would have to add. Population size has to be part of the picture because had we not introduced any migrants to our country then our population would have shrunk considerably by now and that in itself has effects on the cohesion and well being of the population. Actually not. The white British population has been in a gentle but steady decline since the late 1980s when it reached its historical peak following the post-war baby boom. It is now around the same as it was in the 1950s, that is a little over 50 million for the UK.
In the absence of immigration and the natural growth that results from differential birth-rates for various ethnic minorities, the (white British) population would continue its recent trajectory of decline of around 1% each decade.
If that was considered to represent a problem then measures could be taken to halt or reverse the trend, as indeed was the case after both world wars.
|
|
