|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Nov 3, 2023 11:55:07 GMT
How about a small nuclear strike on Iran? It would send a message to any would be sponsors of terrorism. Iran almost certainly has nukes of its own by now. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 3, 2023 12:10:47 GMT
How about a small nuclear strike on Iran? It would send a message to any would be sponsors of terrorism. Wouldn’t that open up a can of worms !😳 Oh, there'd be the usual wailing and gnashing of teeth for about 5 minutes but no one would actually care if Tehran got turned to glass. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 3, 2023 12:11:13 GMT
How about a small nuclear strike on Iran? It would send a message to any would be sponsors of terrorism. Iran almost certainly has nukes of its own by now. Well, there's your justification. Sorted. |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Nov 3, 2023 12:22:06 GMT
Iran almost certainly has nukes of its own by now. Well, there's your justification. Sorted. You want to escalate this to a nuclear war? Are you insane? |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 3, 2023 12:24:15 GMT
Well, there's your justification. Sorted. You want to escalate this to a nuclear war? Are you insane? That wouldn't happen.
Although it probably will eventually if the mullahs are allowed their way.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2023 12:37:47 GMT
Well, there's your justification. Sorted. You want to escalate this to a nuclear war? Are you insane? Only a democrat USA president has ever authorised nuclear weapons to be used in war theatre. It's possible that Israel will use the third bomb on Iran or its proxies. When the Jews say "never again", I think they really mean it. |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Nov 3, 2023 13:12:55 GMT
You want to escalate this to a nuclear war? Are you insane? Only a democrat USA president has ever authorised nuclear weapons to be used in war theatre. It's possible that Israel will use the third bomb on Iran or its proxies. When the Jews say "never again", I think they really mean it. Which would risk bringing Iran's ally Russia into the conflict. No, escalating to the use of nuclear weapons is an insane idea. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 3, 2023 13:33:39 GMT
You can't negotiate with extremists, Monte. They want you dead.
Your only option against that is to make them dead first.
That's a reality that the world is going to have to wake up to.
|
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Nov 3, 2023 13:47:20 GMT
I would consider anyone who wants to nuke Iran an extremist.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2023 14:08:44 GMT
I would consider anyone who wants to nuke Iran an extremist. That changes everything. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 3, 2023 15:11:50 GMT
I would consider anyone who wants to nuke Iran an extremist. You'll get over it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2023 15:31:48 GMT
I would consider anyone who wants to nuke Iran an extremist. That changes everything. Not sure what that means. Is it sarcasm, meaning his consideration changes nothing? Or do you mean that it changes your opinion because of Montegriffo's belief about what constitutes an extremist? Slightly puzzled and not having a go at you. |
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Nov 3, 2023 15:42:15 GMT
I have seen a map of the Hamas tunnels on MSM.
If i have seen them, i am pretty sure Mossad has, and with fare greater precision.
The idea of stopping Hamas by hurlung missiles at approximate ground targets to destroy concrete reinforced tunnels big enough to drive vehicles through and declare you are not targeting civilians, is bullsh1t.
You dont get rid of moles by stomping on the ground above their tunnels.
You find an entrance and either flood or gas the tunnels.
Mossad knows where the tunnels are. Why are they killing children who dont?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 3, 2023 15:45:36 GMT
I’m sure Hamas has enough innocent civilians in the tunnels for you to claim that Israel has committed a war crime if they gas or flood them
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2023 15:55:26 GMT
Not sure what that means. Is it sarcasm, meaning his consideration changes nothing? Or do you mean that it changes your opinion because of Montegriffo's belief about what constitutes an extremist? Slightly puzzled and not having a go at you. It may invoke feelies, but it is meaningless, so yes, it changes nothing. If somebody is about to shoot you, would you shoot first? Does that action make you an extremist even if you still ended up getting shot? Does it even matter? Whether you wanted to shoot that person or not didn't matter, it became a no-choice scenario.
|
|
