|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 15, 2023 10:18:24 GMT
Still in denial then. Your side cheated and now you're lying about anything you can to try and disguise that cheating. There's a common pattern here. Damn, it's 2023 and he's still pushing the same fake news.
If you had actually followed the thread you'd have seen it wasn't me that started that back reference. |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Sept 15, 2023 10:45:50 GMT
It was a remain leaflet. Taxpayers money was misspent on political bias. It gave remain a £9 million pound advantage over leave sending those leaflets to every household on the electoral register. What is so difficult for you to comprehend Steve? REMAIN OUTSPENT LEAVE. ACCEPT IT. And stop grumbling about losing. Still in denial then. Your side cheated and now you're lying about anything you can to try and disguise that cheating. There's a common pattern here. You're still in denial as are others like you. And that's what this thread is about. I've never said Boris Johnson didn't lie, he's a Tory. They all lie. Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, George Osborne, David Cameron, they all lied, it's the only way they know how to campaign. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 15, 2023 10:47:35 GMT
Still struggling with what a lie is then. It's a deliberate untrue known to be untrue when made.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Sept 15, 2023 10:58:43 GMT
Serious question, are you compos mentis? The biggest illegal act in modern UK history was John (The bastard) Major handing the UK to the EU without the consent of the electorate. Another big fat lie from the usual source. As you have been told countless times, he had the permission of the 1992 General Election, the biggest electoral vote in UK history, to join the EU. Jeez, how many times? This is like groundhog day. "Big fat lie"! LOL. You're a pillock, but what's worse, you're a pro EU left wing pillock and they tend to be the biggest pillocks of all. John (The bastard) Major refused the electorate a referendum because he knew the electorate were eurosceptic, he said 'referendums are unhelpful'. That is until 2016 when we voted to leave, when he suddenly decided a second referendum would be a great idea. Wanker. John Major's cabinet considered holding EU vote, papers reveal - link
Sir John Major denied the public a referendum - linkSIR JOHN MAJOR prevented the British people from voting on the Maastricht Treaty - linkHowever: John Major: case for second Brexit referendum is credible - linkJohn Major calls for Commons vote on second referendum - linkJohn Major proposes second Brexit referendum - link
Like you, John (The Bastard) Major has always been and will always be a dyed in the wool anti democratic remainiac. |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Sept 15, 2023 11:03:45 GMT
You're struggling to comprehend that your side lied. It failed to make any credible arguments for remaining, instead scaremongering. And if you're bringing pre referendum party spending campaigns into it again, Britain in Europe 2000 (the campaign to promote the Euro), pro EU lessons in schools, anti UKIP smear campaigns, Hope not Hate, Action 2014, British Influence, the European Movement, EU funding of the BBC... www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-millions-in-eu-funding-the-bbc-tried-to-hide/And once again: Remain outspent leave. |
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Sept 15, 2023 14:11:38 GMT
Still in denial then. Your side cheated and now you're lying about anything you can to try and disguise that cheating. There's a common pattern here. You're still in denial as are others like you. And that's what this thread is about. I've never said Boris Johnson didn't lie, he's a Tory. They all lie. Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, George Osborne, David Cameron, they all lied, it's the only way they know how to campaign. Then why did you believe them?? Not only that but keep repeating the lies as justification for the foulup that is the UK today? |
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Sept 15, 2023 14:13:15 GMT
You're struggling to comprehend that your side lied. It failed to make any credible arguments for remaining, instead scaremongering. And if you're bringing pre referendum party spending campaigns into it again, Britain in Europe 2000 (the campaign to promote the Euro), pro EU lessons in schools, anti UKIP smear campaigns, Hope not Hate, Action 2014, British Influence, the European Movement, EU funding of the BBC... www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-millions-in-eu-funding-the-bbc-tried-to-hide/And once again: Remain outspent leave. How much did Leave pay Cambridge Analytica to spy on your social media and target voters? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 15, 2023 16:15:15 GMT
No remain did not outspend leave. Do you really need me to show you the circulations and content of the massively pro leave media? Do you really need me to show you the spend by UKIP outside of the regulated period? You're just lying about 2016 Vinny to salve your guilt that it's all turned out just like you were told it would. Not a disaster but a poorer choice. FFS they had £9million of taxpayers money for camerons bum wipes for starters . And they were aslo guilty of fasifying accounts and were stung for doing so by the electoral commision. |
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Sept 15, 2023 18:27:56 GMT
No remain did not outspend leave. Do you really need me to show you the circulations and content of the massively pro leave media? Do you really need me to show you the spend by UKIP outside of the regulated period? You're just lying about 2016 Vinny to salve your guilt that it's all turned out just like you were told it would. Not a disaster but a poorer choice. FFS they had £9million of taxpayers money for camerons bum wipes for starters . And they were aslo guilty of fasifying accounts and were stung for doing so by the electoral commision. But they didnt steal your data and use it to target you for votes. So illegal it caused the downfall of the company. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 15, 2023 19:54:57 GMT
You're struggling to comprehend that your side lied. It failed to make any credible arguments for remaining, instead scaremongering. And if you're bringing pre referendum party spending campaigns into it again, Britain in Europe 2000 (the campaign to promote the Euro), pro EU lessons in schools, anti UKIP smear campaigns, Hope not Hate, Action 2014, British Influence, the European Movement, EU funding of the BBC... www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-millions-in-eu-funding-the-bbc-tried-to-hide/And once again: Remain outspent leave. So in your book it's OK for you to bring pre referendum spending by the government in but not same by leave. Well it's not And either you woefully do not know what a lie is or you are wilfully lying because you know you can't show Osborne didn't believe what he said. Still Red wants to cuddle up to you. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 15, 2023 19:56:45 GMT
No remain did not outspend leave. Do you really need me to show you the circulations and content of the massively pro leave media? Do you really need me to show you the spend by UKIP outside of the regulated period? You're just lying about 2016 Vinny to salve your guilt that it's all turned out just like you were told it would. Not a disaster but a poorer choice. FFS they had £9million of taxpayers money for camerons bum wipes for starters . And they were aslo guilty of fasifying accounts and were stung for doing so by the electoral commision. Absolute bollocks. As you have been shown before. Go read the EC reports on Remain - you can read stuff in less than Daily Mail headline font can't you. |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Sept 15, 2023 20:23:22 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 15, 2023 20:43:48 GMT
FFS they had £9million of taxpayers money for camerons bum wipes for starters . And they were aslo guilty of fasifying accounts and were stung for doing so by the electoral commision. Absolute bollocks. As you have been shown before. Go read the EC reports on Remain - you can read stuff in less than Daily Mail headline font can't you. Its you who is talking bollocks. Your lot had MORE than the leave side. There is no way you ot anyone else knows that the remainers had extra as they were fined for not keeping proper accounts. The EC stated that they could not prove how much your lot had extra. Why were your lot fined? |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 15, 2023 21:40:05 GMT
As pointed out they've excluded the overwhelmingly pro leave media spend and UKIP spend pre 2016. And FWIW the EC STILL hasn't updated it's figures and referendum review reports to take account of that illegal spending Gove fraudulently hidden. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 15, 2023 21:40:58 GMT
Absolute bollocks. As you have been shown before. Go read the EC reports on Remain - you can read stuff in less than Daily Mail headline font can't you. Its you who is talking bollocks. Your lot had MORE than the leave side. There is no way you ot anyone else knows that the remainers had extra as they were fined for not keeping proper accounts. The EC stated that they could not prove how much your lot had extra. Why were your lot fined? No they did not. Go on see if you can post an EC link saying so |
|
