Time to censure the social media suppliers

Interesting ideas. I think we could achieve your goals without a physical need to remove wireless access. Apart from that I broadly agree. Children in particular should have monitored access. The easy way to restrict access is to require registration. 
I think why might need to kick this idea around quite a lot to get it workable. 

I'd miss you too. 

Well that sort of behaviour on the part of the influencer needs to be made a serious criminal offence meriting serious jail time. If it already is a serious crime than he or she should be prosecuted. If it isn't then it ought to be. And social media companies should have a legal requirement to surrender the true identities of any such people to the police on demand.

Social media is so ubiquitous that it is never going to be possible to stop everything harmful before it is too late, and armies of moderators would be necessary to shut most of it down fairly speedily. And even then it is unlikely to stop everything bad. And there is the added problem of who decides what is bad and what isnt in borderline cases, though of course the above example is an obvious case of something that should never be acceptable. 

And coming up with algorithms against harmful stuff is easy to suggest but extremely difficult to implement but legal sanctions on social media providers might make them try a little harder. I am naturally wary of giving any government powers of censorship over the internet so we need to be careful. Criminalising the kind of behaviour you cite above from an influencer  I think is a definite urgent step to take. If using any platform to encourage dangerous behaviours by others were made a serious crime, many might think twice before doing this.

Of course, another inherent problem is that the internet is international, so bad actors  encouraging stupid behaviour like this might well not be within the UK jurisdiction. I guess if we don't want government censorship we have to make the platforms themselves legally culpable for their content here.

Sometimes the stupid do need to be protected from themselves, because the idiots who swallowed loads of paracetamols because some prat on the internet encouraged them to, are the kind of brainless goons who should never be trusted with any position of responsibility. It is hard to fathom the utter stupidity of some people.

No. I was asking ZG if he thought it.
My son is very strict regarding his two kids and the internet. The tablets come on at 8am and go off at 7pm. They are very limited in what they can reach. Also he has Plex type tv app that is very restricted.
The oldest kid watched some “ Midsomer murders ‘ and freak out when they stayed at ours .
You don’t need to shut down the internet to keep the kids away from the bad stuff.

I am merely pointing out how ridiculous your situation is.
You have made this point before about restricting the internet without the foggiest idea of how ridiculous your premise is.
The internet should be a universally accessible medium for communication. It should not be subject to leftie virtue signallers telling us how they are going to restrict it fir our own good .

Nope. Pointing out your ridiculousness is adding to the conversation .
You don’t  seem to understand that “The internet should be a universally accessible medium for communication..” IS actually adding something to the conversation. I suspect that your idea of adding something to the conversation is agreeing with you 

Indeed. Certain lefties want to restrict the internet because it’s fertile ground for restriction and comparatively easy to do , if allowed but it is no less authoritarian that restricting adult males to leave their houses because some adult males are guilty of misdemeanours when they do.