Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2022 0:05:41 GMT
By the way, did you hear how much Hancock is being paid for going into the jungle? Apparently a cool £400,000. I still wouldn't do it. ITV has more money than sense, obviously.
|
|
|
Post by colbops on Nov 5, 2022 12:05:55 GMT
In some ways he is well qualified to be in the jungle on that program. He is after all coming from an environment infested with snakes and rats. Seriously, though, his MP salary should be forfeit for the time he is out there. Swanning off to Australia whilst still claiming the salary we the taxpayers fund for the job he has abandoned is frankly just taking the piss out of us all, and reeks of self-interested, entitled arrogance laced with contempt for those of us who pay his wages. Surely it is a matter for his constituency to deal with. If the electorate within his constituency feel he isn't doing a satisfactory job they can choose not to vote for him at the next election. The real question should be is the Recall of MPs Act good enough and does it need to be amended. If the electorate within his constituency feel that he is not doing the job he has been elected to do and needs to be replaced immediately with someone to actually do it, it should be possible for them to trigger a recall petition on that basis shouldn't it?
|
|
|
Post by colbops on Nov 5, 2022 12:08:35 GMT
By the way, did you hear how much Hancock is being paid for going into the jungle? Apparently a cool £400,000. I still wouldn't do it. ITV has more money than sense, obviously. Since everyone is talking about it and they are getting loads of free publicity for their show, it appears to be money well spent and a rather shrewd move. I don't see how you come to the lack of sense conclusion. Can you elaborate?
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 5, 2022 12:13:56 GMT
ITV has more money than sense, obviously. Since everyone is talking about it and they are getting loads of free publicity for their show, it appears to be money well spent and a rather shrewd move. I don't see how you come to the lack of sense conclusion. Can you elaborate? Indeed, so called 'celebrities' eating kangaroo testicles, and I'm sure it will be prime time essential viewing for millions. I wonder, is it possible to dumb down TV anymore?
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Nov 5, 2022 12:21:47 GMT
. I wonder, is it possible to dumb down TV anymore? Nope. We've reached rock bottom with GB news.
|
|
|
Post by ginnyg on Nov 5, 2022 13:15:20 GMT
He might last all of 30 minutes. They can then rename the show "Hancock's Half Hour".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2022 21:24:31 GMT
ITV has more money than sense, obviously. Since everyone is talking about it and they are getting loads of free publicity for their show, it appears to be money well spent and a rather shrewd move. I don't see how you come to the lack of sense conclusion. Can you elaborate? He is going to be one of the first voted out. Money down the drain.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 5, 2022 21:43:28 GMT
He might last all of 30 minutes. They can then rename the show "Hancock's Half Hour". LOL showing your age there ginnyg I don't think he'll get voted out quickly. He's a politician and he is disliked, quite a lot. I think people will want to see him eat and drink lots of nasty stuff. Could be wrong, but that's my take.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 5, 2022 21:45:06 GMT
Since everyone is talking about it and they are getting loads of free publicity for their show, it appears to be money well spent and a rather shrewd move. I don't see how you come to the lack of sense conclusion. Can you elaborate? He is going to be one of the first voted out. Money down the drain. For the reasons I just posted above, I disagree. He wont win, but people will want to see him suffer.
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Nov 6, 2022 13:42:38 GMT
He might last all of 30 minutes. They can then rename the show "Hancock's Half Hour". Used to like that show
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Nov 6, 2022 17:18:44 GMT
He might last all of 30 minutes. They can then rename the show "Hancock's Half Hour". Used to like that show Still available on R4X — as is a lot of stuff new to me...
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Nov 11, 2022 9:51:16 GMT
My wife watches the show I don't when it first started, I watched 10 minutes and that was enough for me load of Midland Bankers, Hancock in my opinion will resign when he has finished the show, it is thought that he wants to make a new career outside of politics probably something in the media
|
|
|
Post by colbops on Nov 11, 2022 11:50:59 GMT
My wife watches the show I don't when it first started, I watched 10 minutes and that was enough for me load of Midland Bankers, Hancock in my opinion will resign when he has finished the show, it is thought that he wants to make a new career outside of politics probably something in the media I doubt it. It is more likely he just won't stand as a candidate at the next GE
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Nov 11, 2022 13:15:30 GMT
These Tory MPs get ever more shameless in lining their own pockets while neglected the duties they are paid to service. Time for a change. I doubt the accusation of 'lining their pockets' can be levelled at Tory MP's only. However, on this occasion Chief Whip Simon Hart was quite right to remove the whip from Hancock. He's being paid £84k a year to represent his constituents, from Australia? Hancock said he will donate a 'part' of his fee to a local hospice, very charitable but it's not good enough. He should forfeit his salary for the time he is in Australia. The man is an attention seeking disgrace. Cop to scallywag: I'm arresting you for shoplifting. Scallywag to cop: Oh ah um right, no problem, I'll put some of them back on the shelves.
What comes next?
|
|
|
Post by colbops on Nov 11, 2022 14:43:19 GMT
Scallywag to cop: Oh ah um right, no problem, I'll put some of them back on the shelves. What comes next?
Some meaningless drivel, a badly executed punchline, another failed attempt at demonstrating how clever you are....
|
|