|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 23, 2023 15:53:13 GMT
As I said, I wouldn't trust a thing Hans Blix says. As an aside, how many innocent Iraqis died during the war that you continue to support? And can you explain why those innocent deaths were less important to you than those of the Kurds? Given a choice between the weapons inspectors and The squeezed middle. I think I'll choose Hans Blix. Ta anyway. I could tell you how many lives were ended by the coalition and how many were considered innocent ones. And how many innocent lives were ended by Saddam aside from the Kurds. The fact you raise it as if its a point in favour of your argument shows you have no idea at all. You're just a headline copier. No, I raise it because it's another example of your empty virtue signalling: You don't care how many die as long as it's in a cause that you believe in. Even if it's based on lies. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jul 23, 2023 15:53:40 GMT
Because they couldn't find any, it didn't exist. Yeah sure that works. Sigh. Well based on that logic, they could have been carried off by Big Foot riding on the Loch Ness Monster. We never found either of those either!🤣 Or the great train robbery never happened because they didn't find the money. Or all the artwork the Nazi's stole didn't exist because they couldn't find it. Are you a small child who believes if you hide something it stops existing? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 23, 2023 15:54:23 GMT
Errrr I'm sure the weapons inspectors know better than you.
They never found ONE WMD, so I know, and they know there were NO WMD, the inspectors now know better, they were on a wild goose chase, the WMD had long long gone, it was just Blair/Bush LYING.
Sigh. .... LOL |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 23, 2023 15:56:25 GMT
Because they couldn't find any, it didn't exist. Yeah sure that works. Sigh. Well based on that logic, they could have been carried off by Big Foot riding on the Loch Ness Monster. We never found either of those either!🤣 ... LOL |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 23, 2023 15:58:27 GMT
Well based on that logic, they could have been carried off by Big Foot riding on the Loch Ness Monster. We never found either of those either!🤣 Or the great train robbery never happened because they didn't find the money. Or all the artwork the Nazi's stole didn't exist because they couldn't find it. Are you a small child who believes if you hide something it stops existing? Or that Zany can't back up his position because there's no evidence supporting it?🤣 Even the source you quote doesn't back you up but you're apparently too dim to work that out. As I said at the start: You were lied to. We all were. It's just that most of us have wised up. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jul 23, 2023 15:59:42 GMT
That it, all you got. Yada yada he killed 5,000 innocent people. Christ that's a very low standard of morals. As of July 19, 2021, according to the U.S. Department of Defense casualty website, there were 4,431 total deaths (including both killed in action and non-hostile) and 31,994 wounded in action (WIA) as a result of the Iraq War
Roll call of the dead: The 179 British servicemen and women who paid ultimate price in Iraq
The number of casualties in the Iran-Iraq War ranges from 1,000,000 to twice that number. The number killed on both sides was perhaps 500,000, with Iran suffering the greatest losses.
So now we know Bush/Blair war had far more deaths and casualties than any war Sadam Hussein caused, now will you agree Bush/Blair were far worse War criminals than Hussein, oh and just a little tit-bit, this will make you cringe even more ...
The United Kingdom was part of the US-led coalition that illegally invaded Iraq in March 2003. The UK forces remained in Iraq until May 2011. During that time, cases of torture, sexual violence, ill treatment, and other inhumane abuses were reported in detention centres where UK forces operated.
WTF. By your own words. Saddam killed 1 to 2 Million, plus the Kurds and the Marsh Arabs The coalition war killed 4,431. How on earth do you conclude "Bush/Blair war had far more deaths and casualties than any war Sadam Hussein caused," That's seriously bad maths. Not to mention the 4,431 deaths in the invasion were not all caused by the coalition. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 23, 2023 16:01:41 GMT
Well based on that logic, they could have been carried off by Big Foot riding on the Loch Ness Monster. We never found either of those either!🤣 Or the great train robbery never happened because they didn't find the money. Or all the artwork the Nazi's stole didn't exist because they couldn't find it. Are you a small child who believes if you hide something it stops existing? Zany, honest I'd stop there ^^ if I was you, it's cringeworthy watching you making a fool of yourself, I'm just trying to be kind and save you from further embarrassment.  |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jul 23, 2023 16:01:58 GMT
Given a choice between the weapons inspectors and The squeezed middle. I think I'll choose Hans Blix. Ta anyway. I could tell you how many lives were ended by the coalition and how many were considered innocent ones. And how many innocent lives were ended by Saddam aside from the Kurds. The fact you raise it as if its a point in favour of your argument shows you have no idea at all. You're just a headline copier. No, I raise it because it's another example of your empty virtue signalling: You don't care how many die as long as it's in a cause that you believe in. Even if it's based on lies. Then you are wrong again. Because obviously you have no idea of the numbers involved. TBH your argument is falling apart so I'd stop pushing it so hard if I were you. Next you'll be telling me WW2 wasn't worth the deaths. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jul 23, 2023 16:02:48 GMT
Or the great train robbery never happened because they didn't find the money. Or all the artwork the Nazi's stole didn't exist because they couldn't find it. Are you a small child who believes if you hide something it stops existing? Zany, honest I'd stop there ^^ if I was you, it's cringeworthy watching you making a fool of yourself, I'm just trying to be kind and save you from further embarrassment. Aw bless. You don't have an answer to that point do you. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 23, 2023 16:03:47 GMT
No, I raise it because it's another example of your empty virtue signalling: You don't care how many die as long as it's in a cause that you believe in. Even if it's based on lies. Then you are wrong again. Because obviously you have no idea of the numbers involved. TBH your argument is falling apart so I'd stop pushing it so hard if I were you. Next you'll be telling me WW2 wasn't worth the deaths. WW2 wasn't based on lies. But thanks for proving my point. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jul 23, 2023 16:05:58 GMT
Then you are wrong again. Because obviously you have no idea of the numbers involved. TBH your argument is falling apart so I'd stop pushing it so hard if I were you. Next you'll be telling me WW2 wasn't worth the deaths. WW2 wasn't based on lies. But thanks for proving my point. Nor was the Iraq invasion. Thanks for giving up. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 23, 2023 16:12:08 GMT
As of July 19, 2021, according to the U.S. Department of Defense casualty website, there were 4,431 total deaths (including both killed in action and non-hostile) and 31,994 wounded in action (WIA) as a result of the Iraq War
Roll call of the dead: The 179 British servicemen and women who paid ultimate price in Iraq
The number of casualties in the Iran-Iraq War ranges from 1,000,000 to twice that number. The number killed on both sides was perhaps 500,000, with Iran suffering the greatest losses.
So now we know Bush/Blair war had far more deaths and casualties than any war Sadam Hussein caused, now will you agree Bush/Blair were far worse War criminals than Hussein, oh and just a little tit-bit, this will make you cringe even more ...
The United Kingdom was part of the US-led coalition that illegally invaded Iraq in March 2003. The UK forces remained in Iraq until May 2011. During that time, cases of torture, sexual violence, ill treatment, and other inhumane abuses were reported in detention centres where UK forces operated.
WTF. By your own words. Saddam killed 1 to 2 Million, plus the Kurds and the Marsh Arabs The coalition war killed 4,431. How on earth do you conclude "Bush/Blair war had far more deaths and casualties than any war Sadam Hussein caused," That's seriously bad maths. Not to mention the 4,431 deaths in the invasion were not all caused by the coalition. The war in Iraq Iran had fuck all to do with the West.
Territorial world wars have been fought since time began, just like the Putin war raging now, it's none of our business to get involved, but Blair/Bush LIED so they could invade and manipulate the outcome.
The Iran–Iraq War was an armed conflict between Iran and Iraq that lasted from September 1980 to August 1988. It began with the Iraqi invasion of Iran and lasted for almost eight years, until the acceptance of United Nations Security Council Resolution 598 by both sides.
Blair/Bush are war criminals guilty of mass deaths and casualties, and that is a FACT.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 23, 2023 16:17:07 GMT
WW2 wasn't based on lies. But thanks for proving my point. Nor was the Iraq invasion. Thanks for giving up. And around we go...🤣 |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jul 23, 2023 16:37:44 GMT
WTF. By your own words. Saddam killed 1 to 2 Million, plus the Kurds and the Marsh Arabs The coalition war killed 4,431. How on earth do you conclude "Bush/Blair war had far more deaths and casualties than any war Sadam Hussein caused," That's seriously bad maths. Not to mention the 4,431 deaths in the invasion were not all caused by the coalition. The war in Iraq Iran had fuck all to do with the West.
Territorial world wars have been fought since time began, just like the Putin war raging now, it's none of our business to get involved, but Blair/Bush LIED so they could invade and manipulate the outcome.
The Iran–Iraq War was an armed conflict between Iran and Iraq that lasted from September 1980 to August 1988. It began with the Iraqi invasion of Iran and lasted for almost eight years, until the acceptance of United Nations Security Council Resolution 598 by both sides.
Blair/Bush are war criminals guilty of mass deaths and casualties, and that is a FACT.
Very poor dodge, You clearly stated. So now we know Bush/Blair war had far more deaths and casualties than any war Saddam Hussein caused,You can't get your figures straight so now you're trying to change your argument. Man up and fess up. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jul 23, 2023 16:42:00 GMT
Nor was the Iraq invasion. Thanks for giving up. And around we go...🤣 Always the same with you. You tie yourself in knots trying to be clever and then start afresh. Still I admire your stamina, it must be hard being shit all the time. |
|
