Death Valley Record high temp, 3 degrees LOWER than 1913

Several points that seem to need continual repetition. Where have I said global warming is not happening? Where have I said the only reason glaciers are retreating is soot?
The thing is if you take a look at all the highest temperatures recorded a pattern starts to emerge that raises concerns that in any other walk of life would raise concerns as to the veracity of the values recorded and the legitimacy of their comparison to past temperatures and readings. There is also the situation where a reading stands for 100 years and suddenly it becomes a non reading and is expunged from the records so that a lower record can stand as the hottest.
You are a businessman,if you base your business on the readings of temperatures available then you would ask questions as to how they were recorded, you would seek verification that they were traceable to national standards and you would wish to know if any other factors were involved. I used to inspect production plants of various sorts and verify the values they were recording and the units they were producing and quite often just a slight digging below the surface and questioning of staff highlighted problems with what they were producing. Temperature recording is no different and if one compares a temp 100 years ago of a station in an open field with temps recorded now from the same sited station now on the edge of an industrial estate and just outside an airport fence then there are reasons to suggest the comparison is not viable. Most especially with new instant response probes being used as opposed to slow response mercury or even spirit thermometers.

The NOAA in teh US have sited new stations in pristine sites to try and negate this question and so far the stations they have record no temperature rise in the US since 2005. Yet we are still told the global temp increase is accelerating when even the last 8 years are below the 30 year average.

The figures they are recording are not telling the tale they would have us believe. These are not a 'few anomalies' they are serious questions. 
They seem to be trying to sell us a pup where even the weather charts are a different hue as though something has happened other than a decision by someone to change the colours. It is a game with obvious plays.

Yes, I realise you are cleverer than that, you don't say global warming isn't happening you just keep hinting it might not be or it might be natural because the figures are not deadly accurate. 
I challenge your assertions that these minor discrepancies in any way indicate that the science on global warming is wrong. 

I challenge the validity of stating some glaciers are receding because of soot as its irrelevant to the fact nearly every glacier is receding. 

I dispute the idea that temperature readings across the globe are erroneous because a few stations are in the wrong place, but that they are only ever in the wrong place that read higher than they should. None apparently read lower than they should, None have ended up in a wind tunnel of a shady area. 

How many times have I asked you how many readings were wrong, each time you post its "A number" 

And i am also aware of the dispute you claim is serious.

www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/feb/08/no-climate-conspiracy-noaa-temperature-adjustments-bring-data-closer-to-pristine

Tierra del Fuego 4C
Brisbane 13C
Cape Town 14C
Hobart 7C
Christchurch NZ 3C
La Manchuiria Argentina 2C
South Pole -53C yes minus 53C

Although you said twice that it is global, it isn't.

You do realise that it is winter in the southern hemisphere don't you?

You do realise the Southern Hemisphere is on the Globe, don't you?