|
|
Post by Toreador on Jul 3, 2023 10:23:01 GMT
No political comment, only a throwaway insult? Thanks for that useful contribution. If you want people to engage, stop trying to do it by way of what comes over as staccato demands; get an attitude. Now to deal with other issues: So, you're kind of proving my point. Maybe Brexit has failed because it was a bad idea? Just a thought.
Stop putting words in other peoples' mouths. I'm not and neither is anyone else proving your point. There was nothing wrong with Brexit other than those who negotiated our leaving, both on the EU and British sides. I made points in my previous post to this effect. Miller, May and some of her appointees, numerous MPs across the house and in the Lords. Businessmen, their representative organisations and a myriad of opponents like yourself. A box of hankies may reach you. |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Jul 3, 2023 10:26:31 GMT
It was defind hash. What the fuck does leave mean? Given that I said "given that Brexit was not defined at the time of the referendum, other than leaving the EU," I can only confirm that your reading skills are as good as your name calling. You think "leave" means something other than leave? So if you say you're leaving this site does that mean you are a liar if you remain? |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jul 3, 2023 11:40:33 GMT
The next Government is at liberty to do anything it wants. However, given his record, if you are expecting Starmer to live up to his promises i suspect you are going to be mightily disappointed.. Maybe. David Lammy is talking about the 5 yearly review already. Can't remember what he said. It's on their mind, though. The agreement was negotiated and signed by the 'Get Brexit Done' government. They agreed to the review provision. So, any changes made by Starmer, however extreme, have a democratic mandate. lammy was of course first to say this was merely an advisory process and should be ignored. Which shows how much he respects the will of the people |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jul 3, 2023 11:47:29 GMT
Maybe. David Lammy is talking about the 5 yearly review already. Can't remember what he said. It's on their mind, though. The agreement was negotiated and signed by the 'Get Brexit Done' government. They agreed to the review provision. So, any changes made by Starmer, however extreme, have a democratic mandate. lammy was of course first to say this was merely an advisory process and should be ignored. Which shows how much he respects the will of the people Maybe. But the 5 yearly renegotiations are built into the TCA. That clause was agreed by Boris and his 'Get Brexit Done' government. So, if Starmer uses it to effect Brino, nobody can claim his actions don't have a democratic mandate. |
|
