|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jun 30, 2023 8:06:11 GMT
It's interesting to see a minority of posters on here who are quite content with the sinister undertakings going on by banks. You will rarely ever see a 'lefty' claim 'I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend till death your right to say it'. Whenever I have seen this used politically regarding Freedom of Speech, it has always been used by someone on the right. The liberal progressives and the left, demonstrate just how intolerant and illiberal they really are. They will go to lengths displayed in somewhere like China to de-bank, cancel, shut-down, hound-out people who don't conform to their world wide views. These odious people are anti-democratic and a danger to the so-called 'free-West'. I agree that it is very dodgy if the nicotine-stained manfrog is being forced to leave the country for political reasons. Very dodgy. But if someone has to take a bullet to highlight the problem, it should be the dick who has been calling for a bonfire of rights (deregulation). The irony is just scrumptious. The problem is Hermy, this has nothing to do with deregulation. In fact, one of the possibilities is that it is retained EU PEP law where banks use their interpretation of EU laws. But it is more likely that the odious little Labour MP who made the allegations that Farage took money from the Russians. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 30, 2023 8:09:34 GMT
I agree that it is very dodgy if the nicotine-stained manfrog is being forced to leave the country for political reasons. Very dodgy. But if someone has to take a bullet to highlight the problem, it should be the dick who has been calling for a bonfire of rights (deregulation). The irony is just scrumptious. The problem is Hermy, this has nothing to do with deregulation. In fact, one of the possibilities is that it is retained EU PEP law where banks use their interpretation of EU laws. But it is more likely that the odious little Labour MP who made the allegations that Farage took money from the Russians. We call that freedom of contract, Bubbles. You know ... the very thing Manfrog has been pushing for in the bid for a Singapore-on-Thames. And it's Freudy Hermy to you. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jun 30, 2023 8:11:02 GMT
The problem is Hermy, this has nothing to do with deregulation. In fact, one of the possibilities is that it is retained EU PEP law where banks use their interpretation of EU laws. But it is more likely that the odious little Labour MP who made the allegations that Farage took money from the Russians. We call that freedom of contract, Bubbles. You know ... the very thing Manfrog has been pushing for in the bid for a Singapore-on-Thames. And it's Freudy Hermy to you. That was around before the UK left the EU. You may want to stop conflating issues Hermy to try and make a political point. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 30, 2023 8:14:43 GMT
We call that freedom of contract, Bubbles. You know ... the very thing Manfrog has been pushing for in the bid for a Singapore-on-Thames. And it's Freudy Hermy to you. That was around before the UK left the EU. You may want to stop conflating issues Hermy. Not conflating anything. Manfrog is pro-Freedom of contract. Under the freedom of contract doctrine people are to be free to contract with whomever they choose. If a bank doesn't want to contract with Manfrog, that's its prerogative under the freedom of contract doctrine. The chinless wonder has been advocating for freedom of contract, and now it's come back to bite him on the arse. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jun 30, 2023 8:19:00 GMT
That was around before the UK left the EU. You may want to stop conflating issues Hermy. Not conflating anything. Manfrog is pro-Freedom of contract. Under the freedom of contract doctrine people are to be free to contract with whomever they choose. If a bank doesn't want to contract with Manfrog, that's its prerogative under the freedom of contract doctrine. The chinless wonder has been advocating for freedom of contract, and now it's come back to bite him on the arse. Maybe so Hermy, but that was alive and well while the UK was in the EU. Your strawman building is not working too well. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 30, 2023 8:20:06 GMT
Not conflating anything. Manfrog is pro-Freedom of contract. Under the freedom of contract doctrine people are to be free to contract with whomever they choose. If a bank doesn't want to contract with Manfrog, that's its prerogative under the freedom of contract doctrine. The chinless wonder has been advocating for freedom of contract, and now it's come back to bite him on the arse. Maybe so Hermy, but that was alive and well while the UK was in the EU. Your strawman building is not working too well. LOL! You may be missing the point, Bubs. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jun 30, 2023 8:25:02 GMT
Maybe so Hermy, but that was alive and well while the UK was in the EU. Your strawman building is not working too well. LOL! You may be missing the point, Bubs. There's no point at all. Unless you have evidence that since Brexit this so-called "freedom of contract" you refer to has only just come into force since Brexit as part of the UK divergence from the EU. You won't have that evidence at all. Therefore, you have no point. Now run along and be a pain on the bottom of someone else's shoe. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 30, 2023 8:29:40 GMT
LOL! You may be missing the point, Bubs. There's no point at all. Unless you have evidence that since Brexit this so-called "freedom of contract" you refer to has only just come into force since Brexit as part of the UK divergence from the EU. You won't have that evidence at all. Therefore, you have no point. Now run along and be a pain on the bottom of someone else's shoe. It hasn't come into effect yet. But it was the plan. Never heard of the Singapore-upon-Thames idea, Bubbles? If the neo-liberals had their way, the banking system would be completely deregulated. That means bugger-all rules. So, if there are no rules, there can't be a rule to say that a bank has to enter a contract with someone like the Manfrog. Farage is living the deregulation dream! |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jun 30, 2023 8:30:55 GMT
There's no point at all. Unless you have evidence that since Brexit this so-called "freedom of contract" you refer to has only just come into force since Brexit as part of the UK divergence from the EU. You won't have that evidence at all. Therefore, you have no point. Now run along and be a pain on the bottom of someone else's shoe. But it was the plan. Never heard of the Singapore-upon-Thames idea, Bubbles? If the neo-liberals had their way, the banking system would be completely deregulated. That means bugger-all rules. So, if there are no rules, there can't be a rule to say that a bank has to enter a contract with someone like the Manfrog. Farage is living the deregulation dream! So you have no point. Moving on. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Jun 30, 2023 8:32:29 GMT
LOL! You may be missing the point, Bubs. There's no point at all. Unless you have evidence that since Brexit this so-called "freedom of contract" you refer to has only just come into force since Brexit as part of the UK divergence from the EU. You won't have that evidence at all. Therefore, you have no point. Now run along and be a pain on the bottom of someone else's shoe. Now,now Darling will be thinking that is something I planted. Before we know it, I will be Vlad mk2. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 30, 2023 8:35:15 GMT
It hasn't come into effect yet. But it was the plan. Never heard of the Singapore-upon-Thames idea, Bubbles? If the neo-liberals had their way, the banking system would be completely deregulated. That means bugger-all rules. So, if there are no rules, there can't be a rule to say that a bank has to enter a contract with someone like the Manfrog. Farage is living the deregulation dream! So you have no point. Moving on. But the Manfrog wants it to come into effect. That's the point, Bubs. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Jun 30, 2023 8:35:47 GMT
It hasn't come into effect yet. But it was the plan. Never heard of the Singapore-upon-Thames idea, Bubbles? If the neo-liberals had their way, the banking system would be completely deregulated. That means bugger-all rules. So, if there are no rules, there can't be a rule to say that a bank has to enter a contract with someone like the Manfrog. Farage is living the deregulation dream! So you have no point. Moving on. None but purely political, which is par for the course, maybe we should consider everyone a pep. or is that pet! |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 30, 2023 8:39:18 GMT
There's no point at all. Unless you have evidence that since Brexit this so-called "freedom of contract" you refer to has only just come into force since Brexit as part of the UK divergence from the EU. You won't have that evidence at all. Therefore, you have no point. Now run along and be a pain on the bottom of someone else's shoe. Now,now Darling will be thinking that is something I planted. Before we know it, I will be Vlad mk2. It's my gammon whisperer's day off, Sheeps. I've no idea what you're talking about. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Jun 30, 2023 8:41:40 GMT
Now,now Darling will be thinking that is something I planted. Before we know it, I will be Vlad mk2. It's my gammon whisperer's day off, Sheeps. I've no idea what you're talking about. Well in fairness, you don't have much idea what you are talking about most of the time, but entertaining nevertheless. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 30, 2023 8:43:27 GMT
It's my gammon whisperer's day off, Sheeps. I've no idea what you're talking about. Well in fairness, you don't have much idea what you are talking about most of the time, but entertaining nevertheless. My gammon whisperer will be back Monday, Sheeps. Let's talk then. |
|
