|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 27, 2022 16:19:24 GMT
At the risk of repeating myself - the only way you will stop this is to introduce offshore processing. That is the only option that has proven to be successful.
|
|
|
|
Post by colbops on Oct 27, 2022 16:45:08 GMT
At the risk of repeating myself - the only way you will stop this is to introduce offshore processing. That is the only option that has proven to be successful. Where is not as important as how. I wonder if immigrant fired power stations could kill two birds with one stone? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 27, 2022 16:49:04 GMT
At the risk of repeating myself - the only way you will stop this is to introduce offshore processing. That is the only option that has proven to be successful. It's not about the money, they could set up these processing centers for far less than £7 million a day.
We have disused army barracks all over the country, we have plenty of facilities that anyone with a business head would say YES USE MY FACILITY, you can use it £1 million a day, a feckin bargain.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 27, 2022 17:01:20 GMT
Oh and abolish the Human Rights Act to stop spurious claims from shyster lawyers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 27, 2022 17:07:05 GMT
At the risk of repeating myself - the only way you will stop this is to introduce offshore processing. That is the only option that has proven to be successful. Where is not as important as how. Well it is. Due to the ambulance chasing human rights lawyers we have in this country, once someone sets foot on UK soil it is almost impossible to remove them no matter what the virtues of their claim. Offshore processing means that they are kept out of the country and only allowed in when their claim is deemed valid. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 27, 2022 17:43:21 GMT
Thought one of the promises made by Brexit we could control our Boarders and lower immigration The True fact is we seen a increased in immigration and illegal immigration I dont think anyone is going to take lessons from the labour party on mass immigration.
Tony blairs 2004 blunder of letting the EU accession countries swamp the uk was a major catalyst that kicked off the brexit argument.
The huge political cost of Blair’s decision to allow Eastern European migrants unfettered access to Britain
And I wonder how much blair's wife made out of the HRA? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 27, 2022 18:24:49 GMT
Strange how Angela Rayner and Starmer must hate these people 'wealthy scum' lol
The Blair rich project: How the former PM’s family made a mint
Euan Blair, the oldest of the former PM’s offspring has done very well for himself. Yesterday it was reported that his education start-up – Multiverse – had been valued at £639 million, making him worth circa £160 million alone (therefore, more wealthy than his father, Tony). It’s been dubbed the ‘Blair Rich Project’ and it’s easy to see why – the family are terribly rich. The Daily Mail previously estimated that Euan’s fortune would have pushed the family’s cumulative fortune to well past the £100 million mark – and now it must surely exceed £200 million?
Tony Blair net worth: How former PM has made his mega fortune since leaving Downing Street
TONY BLAIR has started making headlines again in recent months as Labour makes a post-Corbyn resurgence. The former Prime Minister's distant successor, Sir Keir Starmer, has been steadily rising in the polls. How much is Tony Blair worth?
He should be called Tory Blair lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 27, 2022 18:27:36 GMT
What is Tony Blair’s Net Worth in 2022?
Blair’s Net Worth as of 2022 is $60 million or almost £50.3 million.
The vast majority of the former Prime Minister’s wealth has come through the acquisition of property.
Blair owns two dozen flats in Manchester valued at £27 million, as well as an £8 million house in London.
He reportedly charges £200,000 for a single speaking event.
Today Blair uses a lot of his fortune to fund his various charities and institutions, most notably the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 27, 2022 18:29:37 GMT
Any bets Tony is siphoning his fortune using Euan lol Fuckin Arl arse.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2022 19:05:06 GMT
Oh and abolish the Human Rights Act to stop spurious claims from shyster lawyers. Yes, Fartage doesn't believe in human rights does he? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2022 19:49:51 GMT
Oh and abolish the Human Rights Act to stop spurious claims from shyster lawyers. Yes, Fartage doesn't believe in human rights does he? Yes, Farage does believe in human rights. Unless you have a link with a video or somewhere he says different. Leaving the jurisdiction of a HR court is not the same as "not believing in human rights". |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Oct 27, 2022 21:23:48 GMT
At the risk of repeating myself - the only way you will stop this is to introduce offshore processing. That is the only option that has proven to be successful. By offshore processing I assume you mean Rwanda. It's an option, not an easy option and in my opinion other options are available. Everyone in the world including Macron knows that hundreds of thousands of illegals are queuing up to pay Albanian gangsters in northern France for that golden ticket to an English beach. Yet the EU and Macron continue to look the other way because as far as they're concerned the UK must be punished for Brexit and the UK belongs to the EU. The gloves have to come off, the first thing Sunak or Braverman should do is suspend French fishing licences until Macron takes this seriously and believe me that would focus attention. Of course, French fishermen would blockade ports and Macron would go running to his masters in Brussels who would use Northern Ireland as a bargaining tool. So be it, let's get it on, has anyone got a better idea, because the current situation cant continue. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 27, 2022 21:35:08 GMT
At the risk of repeating myself - the only way you will stop this is to introduce offshore processing. That is the only option that has proven to be successful. By offshore processing I assume you mean Rwanda. Not at all. It should be British Sovereign territory - Ascension Island was considered the best placed in the review by the Home Office. Any illegal migrant should be immediately transported to Ascension where they would then be free to claim asylum if they so wished. All those granted Asylum could then be transported back to the UK to start their new lives - those failing to be granted asylum could stay in Ascension or get free travel to anywhere else in the world. |
|
|
|
Post by borchester on Oct 27, 2022 21:38:09 GMT
Actually, I quite like immigrants. Anyone who is prepared to cross the Channel in a rubber dinghy or similar will clearly be an asset to the UK.
On the other hand, we have millions of people who have shown their hatred of Britain by voting to have this country run by other countries.
So how about a deal whereby for ever boat load of immigrants that reach the UK we send two boat loads of Remainers to the EU?
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Oct 27, 2022 21:43:09 GMT
By offshore processing I assume you mean Rwanda. Not at all. It should be British Sovereign territory - Ascension Island was considered the best placed in the review by the Home Office. Any illegal migrant should be immediately transported to Ascension where they would then be free to claim asylum if they so wished. All those granted Asylum could then be transported back to the UK to start their new lives - those failing to be granted asylum could stay in Ascension or get free travel to anywhere else in the world. Ascension is out of the question, yes I know it's British sovereign territory, but the Yanks are very sensitive about their tracking/listening station on the Island. |
|
