Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2023 13:53:34 GMT
When a schizophrenic woman told ne that there was someone else apart from me and a colleague in the room, I did not affirm what she said. She was wrong.
I got her some medical help and treatment which got her brain to stop seeing people that did not exist.
Perhaps we were all wrong, and there was an invisible person in the room.
|
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 17, 2023 13:54:55 GMT
When a schizophrenic woman told ne that there was someone else apart from me and a colleague in the room, I did not affirm what she said. She was wrong. I got her some medical help and treatment which got her brain to stop seeing people that did not exist. Perhaps we were all wrong, and there was an invisible person in the room. So, you don't believe God was in the room with you? You don't accept that he is omnipresent? I think you believe the Sky Fairy was in the room, and she believed another invisible entity was in the room. There's not much between you, Ned. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jun 17, 2023 13:57:31 GMT
Gender dysphoria is a diagnosis as a form of mental disorder. The term focuses on the discomfort of the disorder as the problem, not identity. Transgender women have a 'female mind'. If you take genitalia as the marker of sexuality, then those people can never be women. However, if you take the condition of a person's mind as the marker of their sexuality, then a person with a penis can be a woman. It all depends on what the primary marker is. A primary marker for insanity used to be sexual attraction, so that same-sex attracted people were defined as insane. Society changed that marker. In short, these things are social constructs. All that is required to make a transgender woman a woman, is for society to change the primary marker. When someone like Starmer says that a person with a penis can be a woman, he is 100% correct. If society changes the primary marker, then a person with a penis will become a woman. The primary marker is the biological fact Darling. Therefore, when Starmer says a person with a penis can be a women, he is 100% wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 17, 2023 13:58:14 GMT
When a schizophrenic woman told ne that there was someone else apart from me and a colleague in the room, I did not affirm what she said. She was wrong. I got her some medical help and treatment which got her brain to stop seeing people that did not exist. Perhaps we were all wrong, and there was an invisible person in the room. Indeed.The cult of magic words insist that if you think it and it’s in their political interests then they can find a magic word that makes it ‘ real’. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 17, 2023 13:59:49 GMT
Transgender women have a 'female mind'. If you take genitalia as the marker of sexuality, then those people can never be women. However, if you take the condition of a person's mind as the marker of their sexuality, then a person with a penis can be a woman. It all depends on what the primary marker is. A primary marker for insanity used to be sexual attraction, so that same-sex attracted people were defined as insane. Society changed that marker. In short, these things are social constructs. All that is required to make a transgender woman a woman, is for society to change the primary marker. When someone like Starmer says that a person with a penis can be a woman, he is 100% correct. If society changes the primary marker, then a person with a penis will become a woman. The primary marker is the biological fact Darling. Therefore, when Starmer says a person with a penis can be a women, he is 100% wrong. Trans zealots want to impose a lie by calling a lie ,truth. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 17, 2023 14:00:22 GMT
Transgender women have a 'female mind'. If you take genitalia as the marker of sexuality, then those people can never be women. However, if you take the condition of a person's mind as the marker of their sexuality, then a person with a penis can be a woman. It all depends on what the primary marker is. A primary marker for insanity used to be sexual attraction, so that same-sex attracted people were defined as insane. Society changed that marker. In short, these things are social constructs. All that is required to make a transgender woman a woman, is for society to change the primary marker. When someone like Starmer says that a person with a penis can be a woman, he is 100% correct. If society changes the primary marker, then a person with a penis will become a woman. The primary marker is the biological fact Darling. Therefore, when Starmer says a person with a penis can be a women, he is 100% wrong. I don't disagree with your premise. If the primary marker is genitalia, then a person with a penis can never be a woman. On the other hand, if a state of mind is the primary marker, then a person with a penis can be a womn. You say that genitalia are a primary marker. Society has seen it that way for a long time. But the primary marker can change, just as it changed with the word sane. These things are social constructs. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 17, 2023 14:01:16 GMT
The primary marker is the biological fact Darling. Therefore, when Starmer says a person with a penis can be a women, he is 100% wrong. Trans zealots want to impose a lie by calling a lie ,truth. They recognise one marker of gender, you recognise another. It's not rocket science. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jun 17, 2023 14:02:38 GMT
i think most religious martyrdoms are pretty brutal regardless of sect / cult involved Are you suggesting we refrain from teaching any children anything of the violence of the past ? Or is your problem you consider it a false narrative of a non existent individual. Removing images of a man being tortured to death would be a good start. Where have your concerns for children being briefly and implicitly taught about crucifixion come from then? Is there any research that supports your latest socio-cultural venture? Or is there some kind of ulterior motive behind this? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 17, 2023 14:03:53 GMT
Trans zealots want to impose a lie by calling a lie ,truth. They recognise one marker of gender, you recognise another. It's not rocket science. It’s magic words . |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 17, 2023 14:04:03 GMT
Removing images of a man being tortured to death would be a good start. Where have your concerns for children being briefly and implicitly taught about crucifixion come from then? Is there any research that supports your latest socio-cultural venture? Or is there some kind of ulterior motive behind this? I have literally billions of ulterior motives for starting this thread. What's your point? |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 17, 2023 14:05:19 GMT
They recognise one marker of gender, you recognise another. It's not rocket science. It’s magic words . Hmmm. The meaning of words change. I suppose there's something magical about that. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jun 17, 2023 14:07:33 GMT
Where have your concerns for children being briefly and implicitly taught about crucifixion come from then? Is there any research that supports your latest socio-cultural venture? Or is there some kind of ulterior motive behind this? I have literally billions of ulterior motives for starting this thread. What's your point? Name three of relevancy then. And let's start to unpack them. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 17, 2023 14:08:36 GMT
I have literally billions of ulterior motives for starting this thread. What's your point? Name three of relevancy then. And let's start to unpack them. LOL!!! How are you going to measure 'relevancy'? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 17, 2023 14:09:02 GMT
Hmmm. The meaning of words change. I suppose there's something magical about that. If the cult of magic words demand particular words change to facilitate a particular agenda then it’s their special magic . Jesus died on the comfy chair . |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jun 17, 2023 14:10:35 GMT
Name three of relevancy then. And let's start to unpack them. LOL!!! How are you going to measure 'relevancy'? Because I suspect the "billions" of motives you have are just unwittingly immature one liners. Let's see how you go. |
|
