|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 17, 2023 14:12:41 GMT
Hmmm. The meaning of words change. I suppose there's something magical about that. If the cult of magic words demand particular words change to facilitate a particular agenda then it’s their special magic . Jesus died on the comfy chair . That's okay. The word awesome used to mean to i nspire fear or dread; now, awesome means something good. I suppose there is a sort of magic to it. The word woman is in a state of transition - it is changing to include those with a penis, who also have a certain congenital state of mind. Nature is Heraclitean flux. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 17, 2023 14:13:31 GMT
LOL!!! How are you going to measure 'relevancy'? Because I suspect the "billions" of motives you have are just unwittingly immature one liners. Let's see how you go. Tell us how 'relevancy' will be measured first. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jun 17, 2023 14:14:53 GMT
Because I suspect the "billions" of motives you have are just unwittingly immature one liners. Let's see how you go. Tell us how 'relevancy' will be measured first. Just tell us three of your motives that made you start this thread. Don't get shy now. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 17, 2023 14:16:06 GMT
If the cult of magic words demand particular words change to facilitate a particular agenda then it’s their special magic . Jesus died on the comfy chair . That's okay. The word awesome used to mean to i nspire fear or dread; now, awesome means something good. I suppose there is a sort of magic to it. The word woman is in a state of transition - it is changing to include those with a penis. Nature is Heraclitean flux. Nope. Trans zealots from the cult of magic words insist that a man who pretends to be a woman should be called a woman . There is no state of transition . It’s a dictat from leftie zealots . |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 17, 2023 14:17:44 GMT
That's okay. The word awesome used to mean to i nspire fear or dread; now, awesome means something good. I suppose there is a sort of magic to it. y The word woman is in a state of transition - it is changing to include those with a penis. Nature is Heraclitean flux. Nope. Trans zealots from the cult of magic words insist that a man who pretends to be a woman should be called a woman . There is no state of transition . It’s a dictat from leftie zealots . Well, it's perfectly logical for them to call her a woman if she has the primary markers they use to identify a woman. If they don't have the markers you use to identify a woman, you should call them what you think is right. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 17, 2023 14:19:12 GMT
Tell us how 'relevancy' will be measured first. Just tell us three of your motives that made you start this thread. Don't get shy now. To support the Mind Zone. To fill up some spare time. To make life-long friendships. |
|
|
|
Post by Ripley on Jun 17, 2023 14:20:30 GMT
Between July and December 2022, Florida schools banned another 357 books with any reference to race, sexuality, sexual orientation or gender identity on the grounds of morality and ethics. Recently, they banned fifty-four maths books they said incorporated topics such as critical race theory.
In response to the banning of algebra books, a man named Chaz Stevens who studied applied mathematics in college petitioned school superintendents across the state to immediately remove the Bible, and any book that references the Bible from the classroom, library, and any instructional material.
In his letter, Stevens questioned whether the Bible, with its references to murder, adultery, sexual immorality, and fornication is age-appropriate, and questioned whether we want to teach our youth about drunken orgies. He also took issue with the many Biblical references to rape, bestiality, cannibalism and infanticide.
Pointing out the hypocrisy of banning maths books but not the Bible, Stevens argued that if you want to teach morality and ethics, do you really want to turn to a book that wants you to dash babies against rocks?" (Psalm 137:9)
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 17, 2023 14:20:32 GMT
Nope. Trans zealots from the cult of magic words insist that a man who pretends to be a woman should be called a woman . There is no state of transition . It’s a dictat from leftie zealots . Well, it's perfectly logical for them to call her a woman if she has the primary markers they use to identify a woman. If they don't have the markers you use to identify a woman, you should call them what you think is right. If he is a biological male then it’s logical to call him a biological male ie man . If he is a biological male who thinks he is a female then it is logical to call him deluded.ie a deluded man. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jun 17, 2023 14:20:57 GMT
Just tell us three of your motives that made you start this thread. Don't get shy now. To support the Mind Zone. To fill up some spare time. To make life-long friendships. So why this particular topic? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2023 14:21:32 GMT
The primary marker is the biological fact Darling. Therefore, when Starmer says a person with a penis can be a women, he is 100% wrong. Remember "follow the science"? The primary marker has been scientifically determined. Female is XX. Male is XY. The mind can be tricked into believing all sorts of falsehoods. However Starmer talks according to the GRA law, which itself reinforces mental delusions. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 17, 2023 14:23:35 GMT
Well, it's perfectly logical for them to call her a woman if she has the primary markers they use to identify a woman. If they don't have the markers you use to identify a woman, you should call them what you think is right. If he is a biological male then it’s logical to call him a biological male ie man . If he is a biological male who thinks he is a female then it is logical to call him deluded.ie a deluded man. If you use genitalia to define what a biological male is then it is logical for you to describe someone with a penis as male. On the other hand, if you use the mind as the marker, it will be logical to describe someone with a penis and a biologically-based female mindset as a woman. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 17, 2023 14:24:29 GMT
To support the Mind Zone. To fill up some spare time. To make life-long friendships. So why this particular topic? It's as good as any other. Anything else I can help you with, Bubs? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 17, 2023 14:25:45 GMT
Between July and December 2022, Florida schools banned another 357 books with any reference to race, sexuality, sexual orientation or gender identity on the grounds of morality and ethics. Recently, they banned fifty-four maths books they said incorporated topics such as critical race theory. In response to the banning of algebra books, a man named Chaz Stevens who studied applied mathematics in college petitioned school superintendents across the state to immediately remove the Bible, and any book that references the Bible from the classroom, library, and any instructional material. In his letter, Stevens questioned whether the Bible, with its references to murder, adultery, sexual immorality, and fornication is age-appropriate, and questioned whether we want to teach our youth about drunken orgies. He also took issue with the many Biblical references to rape, bestiality, cannibalism and infanticide. Pointing out the hypocrisy of banning maths books but not the Bible, Stevens argued that if you want to teach morality and ethics, do you really want to turn to a book that wants you to dash babies against rocks?" (Psalm 137:9) How can a book about maths incorporate critical race theory? The man was disingenuous. The schools were banning the CRT element within the maths books . I don’t believe maths books should include any moral or religious references . |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jun 17, 2023 14:27:10 GMT
Between July and December 2022, Florida schools banned another 357 books with any reference to race, sexuality, sexual orientation or gender identity on the grounds of morality and ethics. Recently, they banned fifty-four maths books they said incorporated topics such as critical race theory. In response to the banning of algebra books, a man named Chaz Stevens who studied applied mathematics in college petitioned school superintendents across the state to immediately remove the Bible, and any book that references the Bible from the classroom, library, and any instructional material. In his letter, Stevens questioned whether the Bible, with its references to murder, adultery, sexual immorality, and fornication is age-appropriate, and questioned whether we want to teach our youth about drunken orgies. He also took issue with the many Biblical references to rape, bestiality, cannibalism and infanticide. Pointing out the hypocrisy of banning maths books but not the Bible, Stevens argued that if you want to teach morality and ethics, do you really want to turn to a book that wants you to dash babies against rocks?" (Psalm 137:9) Sounds sensible to me. Someone would juxtaposed critical race theory with Mathematics would only do so for ideological reasons, certainly not mathematical ones. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 17, 2023 14:27:10 GMT
The primary marker is the biological fact Darling. Therefore, when Starmer says a person with a penis can be a women, he is 100% wrong. Remember "follow the science"? The primary marker has been scientifically determined. Female is XX. Male is XY. The mind can be tricked into believing all sorts of falsehoods. However Starmer talks according to the GRA law, which itself reinforces mental delusions. Indeed. And the primary marker for sanity was once scientifically determined. Those who were same-sex attracted were determined by science to be insane. |
|
