Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2023 14:08:08 GMT
Obviously. And your thoughts of Harriet Harman KC chairperson of the committee tweeting that Boris was guilty, before proceedings had even started? Gives weight to the accusation that proceedings were biased, doncha think? Imagine if you were up in a civil court and before the trial started the residing judge said 'he's guilty', FFS the judge would be removed and probably given the boot, but yet again its the lefty mob, rules don't apply to them. It wasn't a court of law though. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 15, 2023 14:12:28 GMT
That as you well know had nothing to do with the select committee with-hunt. Would Johnson have had to say "fair cop, you got me, I lied" for you to believe he lied to the commons? I rather think, considering committee chairperson Harriet Harmon said Boris was guilty before any proceedings had even started, that whatever Boris may have said prior to that is rather superfluous. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 15, 2023 14:12:53 GMT
Imagine if you were up in a civil court and before the trial started the residing judge said 'he's guilty', FFS the judge would be removed and probably given the boot, but yet again its the lefty mob, rules don't apply to them. It wasn't a court of law though. Fortunately for Harriet Harmon. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 15, 2023 14:33:50 GMT
Imagine if you were up in a civil court and before the trial started the residing judge said 'he's guilty', FFS the judge would be removed and probably given the boot, but yet again its the lefty mob, rules don't apply to them. It wasn't a court of law though. Oh well that makes it ok then, they can stitch him up without fear of consequences, because they aren't a 'court of law' thanks for clearing that up. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jun 15, 2023 14:45:14 GMT
It wasn't a court of law though. Oh well that makes it ok then, they can stitch him up without fear of consequences, because they aren't a 'court of law' thanks for clearing that up. So, quite clearly you are saying that he didn't mislead parliament and didn't seek to undermine or threaten the committee. Is that your view? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 15, 2023 14:57:14 GMT
Oh well that makes it ok then, they can stitch him up without fear of consequences, because they aren't a 'court of law' thanks for clearing that up. So, quite clearly you are saying that he didn't mislead parliament and didn't seek to undermine or threaten the committee. Is that your view? Cast your mind back to Nicola Sturgeon...
Nicola Sturgeon has said she "forgot" about a meeting in which she believes she was told about harassment complaints against Alex Salmond.
The first minister's written evidence to the inquiry into her government's botched handling of complaints against her predecessor has been published.
Now that is when you lie to a inquiry^^
Johnson has never come out with a blatant outright lie, strange there wasn't the same outcry when she lied.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2023 14:58:43 GMT
It wasn't a court of law though. Fortunately for Harriet Harmon. Why so. We all know he lied repeatedly and now he is trying to discredit the committee and cause chaos. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 15, 2023 15:12:43 GMT
Fortunately for Harriet Harmon. Why so. We all know he lied repeatedly and now he is trying to discredit the committee and cause chaos. Because, you pillock, if Harmon as trail judge rather than committee chairperson had said a defendant was guilty prior to the case going to court she would have been struck off and the case thrown out. In conclusion, you said - 'it wasn't a court of law'. To which I replied - 'fortunately for Harmon'. I sincerely hope you understand. If not, you will be held in contempt for being a pillock and sentenced to watching GB News until you have mended your lefty ways. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2023 15:12:51 GMT
Would Johnson have had to say "fair cop, you got me, I lied" for you to believe he lied to the commons? I rather think, considering committee chairperson Harriet Harmon said Boris was guilty before any proceedings had even started, that whatever Boris may have said prior to that is rather superfluous. The committee was a Tory majority committee and would have, if any doubt existed, exonerated Johnson. The committee or parliament would have objected to Harmon to be the chair if they thought there was anything untoward. "On Tuesday MPs will be asked to nod through a motion – backed by the government’s deputy chief whip – for Ms Harman to chair the investigation in place of Mr Bryant". Why are some Tories complaining now and not before the committee started its work? It is another case of "I don't like the result, let's change it". |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2023 15:13:43 GMT
So, quite clearly you are saying that he didn't mislead parliament and didn't seek to undermine or threaten the committee. Is that your view? Cast your mind back to Nicola Sturgeon...
Nicola Sturgeon has said she "forgot" about a meeting in which she believes she was told about harassment complaints against Alex Salmond.
The first minister's written evidence to the inquiry into her government's botched handling of complaints against her predecessor has been published.
Now that is when you lie to a inquiry^^
Johnson has never come out with a blatant outright lie, strange there wasn't the same outcry when she lied.
Bendy bananas. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 15, 2023 15:19:38 GMT
A 90 day suspension is ridiculous it's unprecedented and this committee may have shot themselves in the foot. For months many people have suspected this is little more than a vindictive witch-hunt not least of all because Committee chairperson Harriet Harmon found Boris guilty before any proceedings had even started, and she is supposed to be a KC, ha. A 90 day suspension will do nothing to dispel rumours of a biased vindictive with-hunt. People will say how can it be biased when three members of the committee are conservatives. But look at them: Andy Carter (Warrington South) Was elected in 2019 and is standing down next year. Should such an inexperienced MP be on such an influential committee? Alberto Costa (South Leicestershire) is a remainer. The only person on the committee who may possibly be seen as a Boris ally is Sir Bernard Jenkin and one against six aint good odds. Actually, I said above that Sir Bernard Jenkin may have been Boris's only ally on that committee. I was wrong, I've just discovered that Sir Bernard had a well known visceral hatred for Boris. I think calling these proceedings vindictive and biased may be understating it to be honest. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 15, 2023 15:33:21 GMT
A 90 day suspension is ridiculous it's unprecedented and this committee may have shot themselves in the foot. For months many people have suspected this is little more than a vindictive witch-hunt not least of all because Committee chairperson Harriet Harmon found Boris guilty before any proceedings had even started, and she is supposed to be a KC, ha. A 90 day suspension will do nothing to dispel rumours of a biased vindictive with-hunt. People will say how can it be biased when three members of the committee are conservatives. But look at them: Andy Carter (Warrington South) Was elected in 2019 and is standing down next year. Should such an inexperienced MP be on such an influential committee? Alberto Costa (South Leicestershire) is a remainer. The only person on the committee who may possibly be seen as a Boris ally is Sir Bernard Jenkin and one against six aint good odds. Actually, I said above that Sir Bernard Jenkin may have been Boris's only ally on that committee. I was wrong, I've just discovered that Sir Bernard had a well known visceral hatred for Boris. I think calling these proceedings vindictive and biased may be understating it to be honest. you've seen how cut throat people can be, Philip Schofield is a prime example, last year he was the best thing since sliced bread, now look at him, he's like a social leper, all this 'friends' have stabbed him in the back, Johnson has suffered the same fate, who needs enemies wit friends like these. |
|
|
|
Post by dappy on Jun 15, 2023 15:33:51 GMT
So your view is that every one of these seven people have betrayed the role they were elected to serve and betrayed their personal integrity and the House of Commons they serve. Every single one is part of a conspiracy.
Gosh you have become ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 15, 2023 15:36:29 GMT
Actually, I said above that Sir Bernard Jenkin may have been Boris's only ally on that committee. I was wrong, I've just discovered that Sir Bernard had a well known visceral hatred for Boris. I think calling these proceedings vindictive and biased may be understating it to be honest. you've seen how cut throat people can be, Philip Schofield is a prime example, last year he was the best thing since sliced bread, now look at him, he's like a social leper, all this 'friends' have stabbed him in the back, Johnson has suffered the same fate, who needs enemies wit friends like these. Indeed, fairweather friends. Who needs em. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 15, 2023 15:39:48 GMT
So your view is that every one of these seven people have betrayed the role they were elected to serve and betrayed their personal integrity and the House of Commons they serve. Every single one is part of a conspiracy. Gosh you have become ridiculous. It's a dog eat dog world, Johnson just been eaten. |
|
