Boris resigns with immediate effect.

Habitual troll maybe.

You know as well as I do that language is used ever thus.

Thatcher authorised the meetings and may even have attended but you would rather continue this stupid game of 'splitting hairs'.

I notice that you still will not give a straight answer to my question.

It's not a good look.

Still no answer, as weak as Sunak.

When have I lied to anyone? Please provide an example.

What have I invented? Please provide an example.

You are just blathering because you would condemn any Labour minister for doing what Johnson has done but defend Johnson, double standards at it's best.

Or of course, you are just trolling.

"Margaret Thatcher gave her personal approval to secret talks between government officials and the IRA leadership in 1990, setting in a train a dialogue which led to the Northern Ireland peace process which she now regularly denounces.



In one of her final acts before she was deposed as prime minister, Lady Thatcher allowed her Northern Ireland secretary, Peter Brooke, to talk to republicans through a secret "back channel" after MI5 advised the government that the IRA was looking at ways of ending its terrorist campaign.



The disclosure of her involvement will embarrass the former prime minister who has always insisted she never talked to terrorists. Lady Thatcher, who was nearly murdered by the IRA in the 1984 Brighton bomb attack, also gave the go-ahead to the talks in the same year that republicans murdered her friend and close colleague, Ian Gow". Guardian

You are playing with words a typical trolling tactic.

I could do exactly the same just from your post that I am responding to but I for one, do not want to look childish as you appear to do.

Thatcher authorised her government ministers to talk to terrorists therefore they spoke on her behalf, it really is simple.

I meant exactly what I said Thatcher spoke to terrorists.

"Margaret Thatcher 'negotiated with IRA'". BBC news

Now stop trolling.

"However, in the majority of situations there is generally some other issue at the heart of a dispute, rather than an actual desire to kill the other party being the motivation in itself. 'Wanting to kill' wasn't deemed the primary objective, and so Ukraine and Russia decided that after all, they should get together and attempt to resolve their dispute. Russia happy to head back home, and Ukraine satisfied they'd fulfilled their obligations to the US, cash already safely tucked in Swiss bank accounts and the added sweetener of EU membership.

Your words to another post.

Russia and Ukraine cannot talk and certainly cannot decide, so it is obviously a lie, according to you reasoning.

A country does not have feelings so cannot be 'happy'. Another lie.

You cannot tuck money into a bank account, another lie.