Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2023 0:37:35 GMT
...He was murdered by a racist cop. Except that no evidence for any racial motivation was ever found. It's just more manufactured outrage made up by the left. A good point. So long as the left keep repeating a claim then it's true. This is most likely why they keep racially abusing white folk whilst repetitively insisting that it isn't racist to do so.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jun 3, 2023 5:49:42 GMT
5 BLACK police officers, not one, or two or three or four but FIVE big strapping Black cops beat to death ONE unarmed man, the fact that he was also black makes it even worse, black cops just kill for the sake of it.
Where's all the knee takers? Where's the outraged lefties? Where the virtue signalling?
Hardly a dickiebird about it, because the 5 killers cops were all BLACK.
5 white cops had beaten to death one black man we'd never ever hear the end of it, just like George Floyd.
Using this pathetic "tit for tat" wont wash Instead, tell me what the statistics are, tell me how often are there incidents of black officers abusing their power, or beating people up, or wrongly arresting or detaining people, or even shooting unarmed suspects. Then, compare it to how many instances there are of white police officers doing the same thing to black people , why is it that a black person in this country is 10 times more likely to be stopped using "Stop & Search" as against a white person.You cannot deny facts, and there is a huge discrepancy, and its based on prejudice, nothing else Because usually its the blacks who carry out the crimes. Thats why fiddler. How many times were matchettes used on our streets before Blair stated to import all and sundry? Somwe of us live in the real world and not the made up labour Utopia of everything was wonderfull when they infested the HOC. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jun 3, 2023 7:40:58 GMT
Except that no evidence for any racial motivation was ever found. It's just more manufactured outrage made up by the left. A good point. So long as the left keep repeating a claim then it's true. This is most likely why they keep racially abusing white folk whilst repetitively insisting that it isn't racist to do so.
Indeed. Just look at how many times fiddler has repeated the same lies on this thread alone - despite repeatedly being shown evidence to the contrary.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2023 10:41:55 GMT
Using this pathetic "tit for tat" wont wash Instead, tell me what the statistics are, tell me how often are there incidents of black officers abusing their power, or beating people up, or wrongly arresting or detaining people, or even shooting unarmed suspects. Then, compare it to how many instances there are of white police officers doing the same thing to black people , why is it that a black person in this country is 10 times more likely to be stopped using "Stop & Search" as against a white person.You cannot deny facts, and there is a huge discrepancy, and its based on prejudice, nothing else Because usually its the blacks who carry out the crimes. Thats why fiddler. How many times were matchettes used on our streets before Blair stated to import all and sundry? Somwe of us live in the real world and not the made up labour Utopia of everything was wonderfull when they infested the HOC. We are talking here about "Stop & Search", therefore what you are saying is that the police are purposely stopping black people in particular, who are not in the process of committing any crime, the vast majority have not committed a crime, but in your opinion its ok, because they are black, and black people proportionally commit more crime. Pathetic |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jun 3, 2023 10:58:29 GMT
Because usually its the blacks who carry out the crimes. Thats why fiddler. How many times were matchettes used on our streets before Blair stated to import all and sundry? Somwe of us live in the real world and not the made up labour Utopia of everything was wonderfull when they infested the HOC. We are talking here about "Stop & Search", therefore what you are saying is that the police are purposely stopping black people in particular, who are not in the process of committing any crime, the vast majority have not committed a crime, but in your opinion its ok, because they are black, and black people proportionally commit more crime. Pathetic It's an established fact that Black people commit more street crime than any other ethnic group - stop and search is designed to stop street crime so if you dont want blacks targetted who do you want? - Chinese? - Hassidic Jews? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2023 11:06:23 GMT
We are talking here about "Stop & Search", therefore what you are saying is that the police are purposely stopping black people in particular, who are not in the process of committing any crime, the vast majority have not committed a crime, but in your opinion its ok, because they are black, and black people proportionally commit more crime. Pathetic It's an established fact that Black people commit more street crime than any other ethnic group - stop and search is designed to stop street crime so if you dont want blacks targetted who do you want? - Chinese? - Hassidic Jews? How about targeting people WHO HAVE committed a crime, or target those whom you have reasonable grounds of suspecting have committed a crime. But stopping people with no grounds what so ever simply because they are black is 100% not acceptable We can all remember the resulting riots of the 1980s due to police harassment, do you want to see a re-run of such events again. ? |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jun 3, 2023 11:07:32 GMT
Because usually its the blacks who carry out the crimes. Thats why fiddler. How many times were matchettes used on our streets before Blair stated to import all and sundry? Somwe of us live in the real world and not the made up labour Utopia of everything was wonderfull when they infested the HOC. We are talking here about "Stop & Search", therefore what you are saying is that the police are purposely stopping black people in particular, who are not in the process of committing any crime, the vast majority have not committed a crime, but in your opinion its ok, because they are black, and black people proportionally commit more crime. Pathetic And again.
Stop and Search is applicable to “Street crimes” like robbery and drug-dealing.
Home Office research shows that the police do not target black people for stop & search. They target areas where the highest amount of street crime is reported.
Those crime types are more prevalent in “Poor” areas with a lower socio-economic status which, for complex social and historical reasons (yes, probably including racism), contain more black people.
When you adjust for the street demographic in those areas in which street crimes are highest, there is no disproportionality to Stop and Search.
You've been told this multiple times now, fiddler. So please stop peddling lies.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2023 11:17:43 GMT
Except that in most cases, black people are found to be innocent of committing any crimes after been stopped and searched.
Also, many black people are stopped multiple times, dozens of times, and each time they are innocent and have not committed any crime.
Now you can put forward any excuse you so wish, but if I was a young black man who had been stopped and searched SIXTY TIMES, I would be very fucking angry, and I would be extremely resentfull of the police.
Its not acceptable, and it needs sorting out, otherwise the resentment will boil over and then you will be on here complaining about black people rioting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 3, 2023 11:34:15 GMT
'Suzy Izzard' LOL, stop the world I'm getting off. Pronouns be buggered, Izzard is without a doubt the second ugliest ‘woman’ i’ve ever seen. ‘it’ is exceeded somely by the individual i worked with at British Telecom in 97, an individual who chose to declare their intent to transition and be known as a wonan. Yes we’ve had ‘trans’ people for over a quarter of a century. I have no recollection of what the individual formerly known as Ron chose to be called in their new life. I told them to their face i gave not a toss what they looked like I only cared what code they produced. But i also told them to their face my aunt who declared the weekend transvestite lecturer who taught physiology to my undergrad group had ‘pretty decent legs’ for a man would be unlikely to say the same of them. I agree, what a shocker. He really should have the decency to wear a bag on his/her/it's head. If I bumped into Izzard on a dark night I'd be away on my heels that's for sure. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 3, 2023 11:55:39 GMT
LOL, just look at them, a bigger bunch of left wing dickless wonders you are unlikely to see, outside of Labour HQ obviously. And look at that pillock with clenched first, how virtuous must he feel. Honestly, kneeling in respect of a lifelong criminal who died in another country thousands of miles away. What a bunch of morons. He didn't just die. He was murdered by a racist cop. Millions of people die every day, and yes some are murdered. In view of the fact that in the US black homicide rates are seven to eight times higher than whites, I think a 'White Lives Matter' campaign would be more than appropriate. Floyd was a lifelong criminal with a long rap sheet, of that there is no doubt. However according to the court, the police officer who restrained him was not a racist. He was simply restraining a violent criminal. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jun 3, 2023 11:56:31 GMT
Because usually its the blacks who carry out the crimes. Thats why fiddler. How many times were matchettes used on our streets before Blair stated to import all and sundry? Somwe of us live in the real world and not the made up labour Utopia of everything was wonderfull when they infested the HOC. We are talking here about "Stop & Search", therefore what you are saying is that the police are purposely stopping black people in particular, who are not in the process of committing any crime, the vast majority have not committed a crime, but in your opinion its ok, because they are black, and black people proportionally commit more crime. Pathetic The only being pathetic is you with all your faux concerns. You don't even fool yourself fiddler |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jun 3, 2023 12:02:08 GMT
He didn't just die. He was murdered by a racist cop. Millions of people die every day, and yes some are murdered. In view of the fact that in the US black homicide rates are seven to eight times higher than whites, I think a 'White Lives Matter' campaign would be more than appropriate. Floyd was a lifelong criminal with a long rap sheet, of that there is no doubt. However according to the court, the police officer who restrained him was not a racist. He was simply restraining a violent criminal. I wonder how many putin murdered today? |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Jun 3, 2023 12:21:55 GMT
He didn't just die. He was murdered by a racist cop. Millions of people die every day, and yes some are murdered. In view of the fact that in the US black homicide rates are seven to eight times higher than whites, I think a 'White Lives Matter' campaign would be more than appropriate. Floyd was a lifelong criminal with a long rap sheet, of that there is no doubt. However according to the court, the police officer who restrained him was not a racist. He was simply restraining a violent criminal. The court may have decided it was not racially motivated and I will happily admit I am mistaken here but the court very definitely did not decide that Chauvin ''was simply restraining a violent criminal''. The court convicted him of murder although it took mass demonstrations to even get the matter investigated. Without those demonstrations it is possible that he would never have faced prosecution. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 3, 2023 12:34:40 GMT
Millions of people die every day, and yes some are murdered. In view of the fact that in the US black homicide rates are seven to eight times higher than whites, I think a 'White Lives Matter' campaign would be more than appropriate. Floyd was a lifelong criminal with a long rap sheet, of that there is no doubt. However according to the court, the police officer who restrained him was not a racist. He was simply restraining a violent criminal. The court may have decided it was not racially motivated and I will happily admit I am mistaken here but the court very definitely did not decide that Chauvin ''was simply restraining a violent criminal''. The court convicted him of murder although it took mass demonstrations to even get the matter investigated. Without those demonstrations it is possible that he would never have faced prosecution. Chauvin wasn't prosecuted because Floyd died. He was prosecuted because the state were terrified of black mobs rioting if he wasn't. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Jun 3, 2023 12:41:14 GMT
Why does the video only commence when the door is opened. Why no video of the interaction on first being stopped. If stopped by the police the best course of action is yes officer, no problems officer. The police are human beings and will not take kindly to being met with belligerence when doing their duty. You assume why they were stopped for being black as opposed to driving suspiciously. I suggest you look at how the stats on stop and search are calculated and why stop and search is carried out. It is hardly the fault of the police that in order to protect the black community from each other then certain areas are chosen and if information by way of description is obtained then they have to act on that description. I do not assume anything at all, I know that this young couple were racially profiled, they WERE stopped for no reason other than for been black people in an expensive car. The police officers told a pack of lies, they suggested that they could smell cannabis coming from the vehicle - two medal winning athletes ... smoking ?. I also know the final outcome of this incident, and I know that the Metropolitan Police APOLOGISED for what happened, but more to the point is the FACT that this happens a lot. If these two were not famous athletes, it probably would never have attracted the publicity How do you know they were racially profiled and that the reason given was false? You assume everything because it fits your chosen narrative and I repeat when a policeman stops you and questions you then the best course of action is yes officer, how can I help officer and not scream and shout. It is a fairly simple outlook. |
|
