climate change

After today Net Zero is a pointless exercise as we are all going to get wiped out whatever we do.. might just as well enjoy ourselves..

Remember I went to high school where physics and chemistry were my career subjects and my first job was in the laboratory of a world renowned company. Whilst there, I did, and almost completed, an ONC in chemistry and physics but gave up two months before completion, admitting that it was a dead end career. If you don't know what an ONC is, then it's an Ordinary National Certificate and equivalent to an Inter-BSC.

Trust the experts? By Friday I should have an expert phone me with a diagnosis and course of treatment. The original and incorrect diagnosis was made back in August by a GP and backed up by other GPs in the practice, all of them wrong and probably all of them attempting to defend a wrong diagnosis; it's what they do.

Could means maybe....or maybe not.

Sad to see you reduce yourself this way. 

Yes you got high school chemistry so you keep saying ad nauseum. That does not mean you understand climate change as well as NASA. 
Physics in particular, requires a great deal of logical thinking and an IQ that is well beyond you.
But I passed my O level physics. 

Your career was selling roofing insulation from a warehouse.

You were wrong first time you said that and you are wrong again. 
I run a company currently employing 112 people that requires an intelligence well beyond you (Not nice is it)

I know what an ONC is and note you failed to get it.
I explained why why I gave it up, perhaps you didn't catch on.
Sure you gave up just before passing, that sounds totally believable. 

Thousands of scientists agree on climate change from many countries across the globe. Added to this we see the evidence of our own eyes as glaciers melt and we see record temperatures.
How many scientists don't agree and confirm why you think man made CO2 is the driving force for the planet achieving a miniscule temperature increase; use whatever timescale you want.
i have no idea, but far less than agree, figures of around 90% agree with AGW.

So forgive me if I believe NASA over a failed chemist student on an unknown forum. 
I'm quite happy that I'm with the majority who think your analysis is not proven. I'm quite happy that much of the crap coming from warmists is at the behest of and influenced by indoctrinated  kids. Tell us, is it a condition of employment in your company that candidates subscribe to your views or are you commercially declining because people are fed up with your views? Is your company promoting your agenda?
The majority on here, Lol. There goes your logical thinking. 
I'm quite happy your flawed logic has failed and the warmists have won. That you can moan all day and still we are switching to renewable energy and heading for net zero. That EV's will overtake ICE vehicles (pun intended) in the next ten years. 

My company does not need to promote any agenda, we employ a lot of bright young things who already know more about climate change than you ever could. They are the future and they want the changes. 
My company has expanded from 8 to 10 centres in the last year. Our audience is young families and they would support my views if I expressed them. Its only out of date old men like you who don't believe in climate change. That and click bait posters looking to make money from the gullible. 
The only suffering in sales we have is because of the stupid increase in interest rates that are having no effect on inflation, but that's a different thread. 

No I'm saying its more complicated and I expected you to know that. We have been lucky to experience a solar maunder, we found the the Atlantic escalator pulled warm water down to the depths. 
None of those things mean AGW is not happening, they just bought us time. 
Further if ONE scientist said there was climate change due to man I wouldn't believe them. But millions of scientist say its happening, so I listen. 
I'm amazed to find you sounding like Jonsky.