india demands return of treasures The uk stole

Perhaps, it was unreasonable for the wealthy elite to expect the poor and the descendants of the slaves to pay them vast sums for the emancipation of people they enslaved while paying the slaves themselves nothing. What do you think?  Do you think what happened reflects well on early capitalism?

Religious establishments have used a stylised interpretation of religion as an instrument of oppression for thousands of years .
Britain is no exception.
Ordinary people are always locked in a struggle with the elite , including the elite who try to impose socialism .
iirc scores of millions of ordinary people were impoverished and killed by the elite trying to impose Socialism/ communism.

Do they? Do you have a link?

Do I have a link where Marx’s disciples tend to give that impression in the same way as Christian zealots tend to ?
Some  quote Marx as if his utterings were gospel. Some  claim that magic words can define men as women .

Why do you believe the Empire was something to be proud of 'on balance'? Is it because you believe it brought democracy to nations that would not have  it otherwise? 

In order for that claim to hold water, you must demonstrate that democracy has not developed in other countries that were not occupied by Britain. If it is demonstrated that countries  can develop into democracies without having it imposed upon them by an outside source such as the UK, your argument fails, as there is no reason to believe that, say, India would not have developed democracy of its own accord.

If you wish to say that it brought a stop to the practice of thuggery and the killing of wives on their husbands' death, you must demonstrate that that actually happened in reality (that it wasn't just the case that a small dent was made in the practice in those areas where the thinly strected British forces had a presence) and you must establish that India would not have brought it to an end of its own accord. If you wish to argue that it would only have happened later if India had done it of its own accord (with many dying in the meantime), you must show that those numbers are greater than those we know to have died as a direct result of the Empire (those who died of starvation, were turned into junkies, etc.).

I've used the word 'must' a lot in this post. It goes without saying that you don't have to do anything. Of course, you are not even compelled to reply.

Newton was a mathematician and scientist. People quote Newtons regarding his maths and science discoveries Darlene 
You never read his views on alchemy or the holy trinity .
Darwin was a scientist who proposed a theory that seems to be correct .
Marx was a political philosopher who’s followers not only repeatedly failed to impose his doctrine but killed millions of people in the process.
There is no Churchillian political doctrine .