|
Post by see2 on May 14, 2023 7:23:02 GMT
19 transgender prisoners were in custody with 12 recorded as beginning their transition “after their date of admission”. Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 14, 2023 7:44:47 GMT
Telegraph claims Starmer is willing to give EU nationals the vote in elections in order to consolidate Labour in future government, as well as rig a future EU referendum. He's also trying to do a Sturgeon and give 16 & 17 years olds the vote because he knows that data says that the young and naïve vote Labour. Many faces Starmer has form when it comes to lying and the snake cannot be trusted. "Many faces Starmer" ? More mud slinging ^^^ that is so common amongst right-wingers, they obviously do it because they find derogation comes so much easier than debate. Probably helped by reading right-wing so called newspapers like the Telegraph. The Telegraph allegation appears without proof suggesting it is just more mud slinging, a problem that appears to be in the DNA of limited thinking right-wingers.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 14, 2023 7:51:08 GMT
Deception! nothing new there, take Farage for instance Deceivers exist in all walks of life, and on many forums like this one. Being LGBT doesn't make people rapists, one either is or is not a rapist. Presumably all actions in a rape case will be taken into account. Your broad brush approach seems to infer these LGBT rapists are all over the place, but that does not appear to be the case. It gives rapists the opportunity to declare themselves as of the opposite sex, that is what is happening. How many cases are you talking about? The bottom line is that LGBT WILL NOT GO AWAY, it is part of the human condition, so it needs to be recognised and dealt with. All criminals need to be dealt with regardless of their sexual orientation.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 14, 2023 7:52:44 GMT
19 transgender prisoners were in custody with 12 recorded as beginning their transition “after their date of admission”. Thank you. Just for you, that means that more than half are deciding they are woman 'after' arrest,
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2023 8:07:04 GMT
I can name a lot of older people that are not 'sensible' enough to use a sunbed unsupervised, so that does not work. You make the mistake of lumping all young people under one banner but by your own statement it can be inferred that nobody should vote. 'Some older people commit crime therefore all older people are criminals', this is a typical right-wing trope. Its the politicians that are doing that - the Law treating all kids the same and believing they are not sensible enough was introduced by the Labour Party. The whole country thought 16 year olds were not 'sensible' enough but times have changed, 16,17 year olds are a lot more 'savvy' than they used to be. Were the Tories advocating giving teens the vote then, since you mention Labour?
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 14, 2023 8:08:59 GMT
Just for you, that means that more than half are deciding they are woman 'after' arrest, They could choose who they mix with before arrest.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on May 14, 2023 8:17:48 GMT
Telegraph claims Starmer is willing to give EU nationals the vote in elections in order to consolidate Labour in future government, as well as rig a future EU referendum. He's also trying to do a Sturgeon and give 16 & 17 years olds the vote because he knows that data says that the young and naïve vote Labour. Many faces Starmer has form when it comes to lying and the snake cannot be trusted. "Many faces Starmer" ? More mud slinging ^^^ that is so common amongst right-wingers, they obviously do it because they find derogation comes so much easier than debate. Probably helped by reading right-wing so called newspapers like the Telegraph. The Telegraph allegation appears without proof suggesting it is just more mud slinging, a problem that appears to be in the DNA of limited thinking right-wingers. As usual there is no substance to your posts. It's apparent your amygdala just flips.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on May 14, 2023 8:18:57 GMT
Telegraph claims Starmer is willing to give EU nationals the vote in elections in order to consolidate Labour in future government, as well as rig a future EU referendum. He's also trying to do a Sturgeon and give 16 & 17 years olds the vote because he knows that data says that the young and naïve vote Labour. Many faces Starmer has form when it comes to lying and the snake cannot be trusted. 16 and 17 year olds can join the armed forces and potentially be put at risk, they also pay taxes if they earn enough but people think they should not have a say in how their taxes are spent. It is immigrants who live 'permanently' in the UK that will get the vote, again these people pay taxes and should have a say in how the country is run. They should be citizens instead of permanent residents.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2023 8:22:56 GMT
16 and 17 year olds can join the armed forces and potentially be put at risk, they also pay taxes if they earn enough but people think they should not have a say in how their taxes are spent. It is immigrants who live 'permanently' in the UK that will get the vote, again these people pay taxes and should have a say in how the country is run. They should be citizens instead of permanent residents. Why? They pay taxes to our exchequer and should have a say in how those taxes are spent.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 14, 2023 8:24:11 GMT
Just for you, that means that more than half are deciding they are woman 'after' arrest, They could choose who they mix with before arrest. So let's get this straight, at what you are saying.
A 'man' rapes or sexually assaults a woman/women/children, they get caught and then declare themselves transgender, and demand they go to a female prison?
'Isla Bryson' who raped two women as a 'man' was exposed for what he was a 'chancer', by his ex-'wife', who said he was absolutely not transgender, and it was all a big con so he wouldn't be sent to a mans prison, but every single woman in that prison at risk, because he still would have a PENIS, to carry out his assaults.
Thank goodness you don't reside on any part of the judicial service that makes decisions in these cases, because you would be as bigger danger to women as Isla Bryson.
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on May 14, 2023 8:34:52 GMT
Its the politicians that are doing that - the Law treating all kids the same and believing they are not sensible enough was introduced by the Labour Party. The whole country thought 16 year olds were not 'sensible' enough but times have changed, 16,17 year olds are a lot more 'savvy' than they used to be. Were the Tories advocating giving teens the vote then, since you mention Labour? Other than Britain I think no other western nation recruits kids under 19 and very few nations support the idea. That aside, they are not allowed to participate in front line duties until they are 18. As for 16/17 year olds being more savvy...nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on May 14, 2023 8:56:30 GMT
They should be citizens instead of permanent residents. Why? They pay taxes to our exchequer and should have a say in how those taxes are spent. So do migrants on holiday visas.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2023 9:28:43 GMT
Why? They pay taxes to our exchequer and should have a say in how those taxes are spent. So do migrants on holiday visas. What a permanent holiday visa?
|
|
|
Post by thomas on May 14, 2023 9:38:57 GMT
and from september 2015 , the majority of polls had a remain win ?
But Scotland voted in 2014 - hot on the heels of a year when a majority of polls were suggesting we would leave. So your idea that Scotland voted to remain in the UK on the basis that there was no chance of the UK leaving the EU was incredibly naive. The scottish independence vote was september 2014. From April /May 2014 if you look at the below graph , remain went into the lead , and not only stayed there , but the remain lead grew until the actual brexit referendum itself. Sorry your attempt to re write history has failed once more pacifico , but there you go.
Even though througout most of 2014 and the scot indy ref the polls were showing a remain vote for the EU , i agree , many scots were incredibly naive. Everything they told us would happen if we voted to end this awfull union has happened because we voted to stay.
Salmond: Scots must drive for independence after being ‘conned’ in 2014
Salmond will addresses the Alba party conference in Inverness on Saturday.
Scots need to “drive forward now” with a fresh independence bid after voters were “conned” into staying in the UK in 2014, Alex Salmond will claim.
The former Scottish first minister will insist that almost a decade on from the referendum, the arguments that led to a majority voting for the union have been “destroyed”.
Salmond, who formed the pro-independence Alba Party after quitting the SNP, will make the claims as he addresses his party conference in Inverness on Saturday.
He will use his keynote speech to accuse the UK Government, which has repeatedly refused requests for another independence referendum, of “running scared”.
Salmond will say: “The Tories have not just wrecked the economy – they have wrecked their own economic case for the union along with it.
He will claim that in 2014, pro-UK parties “told us we would be safe in Sterling”, but “now Sterling is kept afloat by sky-high interest rates and every household in Scotland is paying the price”.
He will continue: “In 2014 they told us that staying in the UK would mean lower energy bills – falling by £50. Now every household in Scotland is paying thousands extra.
“The No campaign in 2014 sneaked home on a false prospectus. Tory and Labour – the Better Together coalition – conned Scotland out of independence.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 14, 2023 10:24:27 GMT
But Scotland voted in 2014 - hot on the heels of a year when a majority of polls were suggesting we would leave. So your idea that Scotland voted to remain in the UK on the basis that there was no chance of the UK leaving the EU was incredibly naive. The scottish independence vote was september 2014. From April /May 2014 if you look at the below graph , remain went into the lead , and not only stayed there , but the remain lead grew until the actual brexit referendum itself. Sorry your attempt to re write history has failed once more pacifico , but there you go. So on the basis of the polls from May to September in 2014 you came to the conclusion that the UK would never vote to Leave the EU - even though there had been a clear majority to do just that for several years previously. Sorry but you were being totally naive as history proves.
|
|