|
|
Post by colbops on May 12, 2023 2:30:20 GMT
That doesn't feel right either. Why not just use the term noncaucasiaphobic. It would seem to describe him to a tee It's political correctness gone mad. Can't even use the ''N'' word anymore. What Neo. I guess it does just make one think of the matrix |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 12, 2023 6:43:03 GMT
That doesn't feel right either. Why not just use the term noncaucasiaphobic. It would seem to describe him to a tee It's political correctness gone mad. Can't even use the ''N'' word anymore. Talking of 'N' - they are going to dig up the poor sod and transplant him to Kings Lynn to make way for illegal immigrants..   |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on May 12, 2023 6:51:04 GMT
It's political correctness gone mad. Can't even use the ''N'' word anymore. Talking of 'N' - they are going to dig up the poor sod and transplant him to Kings Lynn to make way for illegal immigrants.. Probably a good thing he might have been buried with a valuable collar or something and ended up dug up anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 12, 2023 7:08:00 GMT
Looks like we have solved the staffing shortage in the NHS..  |
|
|
|
Post by walterpaisley on May 12, 2023 7:34:40 GMT
Talking of 'N' - they are going to dig up the poor sod and transplant him to Kings Lynn to make way for illegal immigrants.. And I'm pretty sure people would freak out if it were left in situ. They're damned if they do and damned if they don't. Good to see that the inscription has finally been brought up to date, though. |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on May 12, 2023 8:18:47 GMT
Another victory for MiniTrue!
|
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 12, 2023 20:42:16 GMT
As regards teh BNP I acknowledge they were easy meat for those opposed to them but it is not the position of the main political parties or the legal system or the MSM to set out to destroy by concerted action a political party and/or its leadership once it starts to win electoral support. Why not? If a group promotes ideas so toxic and detrimental to society, they should be crushed by any and all means available. Wouldn't it have been a fair result for all concerned if a small party in Germany had been snuffed out at birth? Or the Party of Democratic Kampuchea? Or the FET y de las JONS? That presupposes that your idea of what is toxic holds sway and that way lies anti democratic coalitions. To my mind it would have been better if concerted action had occurred to strangle NewLabour at birth but that would have been wrong especially if the law had been selectively applied to their activities. What you are saying is in the political world any means to defeat that which you hold unacceptable is OK. That is exactly how the examples you gave above obtained their power. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 12, 2023 20:53:47 GMT
Seems like voters saw through the BNP. Each of the 338 candidates in 2010 received 1668 votes (in 2005, the 119 candidates got 1620 votes). In 2015, 2017 and 2019, votes per candidate (8, 10 and 1 respectively) were in the low hundreds. It seems strange that the manifesto, which listed all those areas and proposed taking action that a reasonable population might welcome, dismissed the BNP. No doubt the news media's negative stance played a part, but it might also have been the activities and words of BNP activists... The problem is it was always a balance with teh BNP in that they were easy picking for those wishing to destroy them. That is not the issue. Should selective legal action and a concerted misinformation campaign from the MSM been used as part of the process to destroy their growing support. There is little doubt there was a campaign, well funded, well supported and prepared to use political violence and coerce the law selectively to be part of that process. I say that is unacceptable, it would be unacceptable to lie about Anjem Choudary and selectively apply laws to break his support and he was many times more toxic and, many times more dangerous in his policies than the BNP ever were. Politics is a process of letting the public choose through a process of presenting information for their consideration, it should not be a process of character assassination of any party and the sel;ective application of law by those who are supposed to be apolitical. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 12, 2023 20:58:18 GMT
And who is to be the arbiter of that? So you support political violence. Tell me, did you support Thomas Mair when he killed Jo Cox? Okay then. 1) The norms of society. There are certain things that no decent liberal society deems acceptable. Racism, discrimination, etc. Groups which promote such ideas - especially groups which hold those ideas as core beliefs - will generally find themselves excluded from that society. 2) Of course not. You will never find any statement I've ever made that demonstrates any advocacy of violence. But of course you knew these things already. Got to go now - Eurovision semis have just begun, and friends have just shown up for it.. Liberal society basks in racism and discrimination not just as views but as actual policies and are exactly core beliefs of many in that liberal society. You were involved in disseminating information on BNP members that you knew could encourage violent acts against them, so I think your morals are a bit selective, which is part of my point. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 13, 2023 6:52:58 GMT
The largest demographic and cultural change in the UK since the Norman Conquest - constantly voted against by the British people yet imposed none the less.
As Mark twain said: 'If Voting Made a Difference, They Wouldn't Let Us Do It'
|
|
|
|
Post by walterpaisley on May 13, 2023 7:20:53 GMT
As Mark twain said: 'If Voting Made a Difference, They Wouldn't Let Us Do It'Misattribution. There's no evidence that Mark Twain (who's given credit for almost as many spurious quotes as Lincoln and Einstein) came up with that one. As Oscar Wilde said: "Never trust anything you read on the internet". |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 13, 2023 7:25:19 GMT
As Mark twain said: 'If Voting Made a Difference, They Wouldn't Let Us Do It'Misattribution. There's no evidence that Mark Twain (who's given credit for almost as manta spurious quotes as Lincoln and Einstein) came up with that one. As Oscar Wilde said: "Never trust anything you read on the internet". LOL - I originally thought it was by Tony Benn..... |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on May 13, 2023 7:29:05 GMT
Misattribution. There's no evidence that Mark Twain (who's given credit for almost as manta spurious quotes as Lincoln and Einstein) came up with that one. As Oscar Wilde said: "Never trust anything you read on the internet". LOL - I originally thought it was by Tony Benn..... Why does it matter who introduced it anyway, either it is true or not who said it is irrespective, Mark Twain might have said it in passing. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on May 13, 2023 7:58:20 GMT
As Mark twain said: 'If Voting Made a Difference, They Wouldn't Let Us Do It'Misattribution. There's no evidence that Mark Twain (who's given credit for almost as many spurious quotes as Lincoln and Einstein) came up with that one. As Oscar Wilde said: "Never trust anything you read on the internet". Which incidentally Einstein could never be attributed to Oscar Wilde. A big difference. |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on May 13, 2023 8:06:13 GMT
It's a classic diversionary tactic to deflect attention away from an awkward argument for which there is no rational counter. But anyway, as far as the schools are concerned, the Telegraph report is if anything wildly optimistic. According to the schools census the numbers of non-White British children has been increasing almost metronomically at the rate of a percentage point each year since since the census first began:  The rate of increase slowed somewhat during the pandemic but with net immigration heading for a million and the persistence of differential birth rates it has resumed its inexorable climb. If current trends continue it won't be 40 years before White British are a minority, as reported in the Telegraph, but 17. It has already happened in a third of all local authorities which are responsible for education, including 32 of the 35 London boroughs. |
|
