|
Post by sheepy on Apr 24, 2023 6:56:25 GMT
500 local residents turn out to protest against 1200 illegal male migrants being housed in an old Prison as they already have gangs of them roaming their streets. While the crime rate continues unabated.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2023 9:48:18 GMT
Number of migrants sent to Rwanda = 0. Number of promises to stop the boats = ∞
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Apr 24, 2023 15:50:57 GMT
500 local residents turn out to protest against 1200 illegal male migrants being housed in an old Prison as they already have gangs of them roaming their streets. While the crime rate continues unabated. It seems that the 'migrants' human rights are far more important than the right to a family life that the townspeople have lived to date. It seems that our government will not be satisfied that their work is done until we all sit in a gradually cooling and darkening home, unable to travel, unable to socialise, unable to use cash and unable to allow our children out during the day, let alone at night, in case the legions of young foreign males contain elements whose culture(s) sees children and young girls as available for their sexual urges. Just today I have found out that if I wish replacement multifuel stove for my house I cannot currently have one fitted as none currently comply with the new regulations. Planning for any kind of life is now a bit of a lucky, or unlucky, bag.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Apr 24, 2023 17:12:56 GMT
Number of migrants sent to Rwanda = 0. Number of promises to stop the boats = ∞ Its all bullshit, it just hasn't dawned on anyone yet, they have been playing ball with it for well over a year and slowly but surely withdraw from anything they have previously said. Until it never happens anyway. They have already tried any angle to back away from it. Even forgetting they make the laws.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 1, 2023 17:10:16 GMT
Number of migrants sent to Rwanda = 0. Number of promises to stop the boats = ∞ Thanks to outraged lefty human rights lawyers, people like Starmer.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 1, 2023 17:21:51 GMT
Problem is that the wealthy welcome cheap Labour and the lefties think that the more migrants we get ,the nearer we will become the utopia that they spoke about in the college bar . Meanwhile other people pay the price .
|
|
|
Post by walterpaisley on May 1, 2023 17:32:14 GMT
Thanks to outraged lefty human rights lawyers, people like Starmer. Human Rights Lawyers don't get to just make up new laws - they can only work with law that already exists on the Statute Books. And Human Rights Legislation involves considerably more than just matters of asylum.. But then, of course, there will always be people who don't quite get the "human" bit - and would prefer it to be a buffet where someone gets to decide WHICH human gets to have WHAT rights.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 1, 2023 17:46:54 GMT
Thanks to outraged lefty human rights lawyers, people like Starmer. Human Rights Lawyers don't get to just make up new laws - they can only work with law that already exists on the Statute Books. And Human Rights Legislation involves considerably more than just matters of asylum.. But then, of course, there will always be people who don't quite get the "human" bit - and would prefer it to be a buffet where someone gets to decide WHICH human gets to have WHAT rights. The 'human rights' law so effectively used by lefty lawyers today namely the 1951 Refugee Convention, was penned in the shadow of WW2 when there were millions of displaced people in Europe. It was not designed to stop the government, 70 years later, from deporting foreign criminals and illegal immigrants, but that is exactly what lefty lawyers are using it for. This legislation is quite obviously no longer fit for purpose and should, with a sense of urgency, be repealed.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on May 1, 2023 18:58:22 GMT
Thanks to outraged lefty human rights lawyers, people like Starmer. Human Rights Lawyers don't get to just make up new laws - they can only work with law that already exists on the Statute Books. And Human Rights Legislation involves considerably more than just matters of asylum.. But then, of course, there will always be people who don't quite get the "human" bit - and would prefer it to be a buffet where someone gets to decide WHICH human gets to have WHAT rights. Well that's a problem because? that somebody actually has to make a decision or local people will be left suffering. Obviously this is just one example of hundreds, so maybe while human rights lawyers are looking busy being somehow thoughtful, they have no thought for the real actual victims of their getting wealthy while dressing up.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 1, 2023 19:31:01 GMT
Human Rights Lawyers don't get to just make up new laws - they can only work with law that already exists on the Statute Books. And Human Rights Legislation involves considerably more than just matters of asylum.. But then, of course, there will always be people who don't quite get the "human" bit - and would prefer it to be a buffet where someone gets to decide WHICH human gets to have WHAT rights. Well that's a problem because? that somebody actually has to make a decision or local people will be left suffering. Obviously this is just one example of hundreds, so maybe while human rights lawyers are looking busy being somehow thoughtful, they have no thought for the real actual victims of their getting wealthy while dressing up. I agree. Enabling one individual a human right in some way runs the risk of transgressing another's human right. A family living near a concentration of enabled human rights recipients in a camp, may result in the loss of their right to family life, it certainly creates a significant risk for them. It seems human rights belong to some but certainly not to the British.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 2, 2023 6:15:11 GMT
I think the problem most decent folk have is that they don't believe the asylum checking is effective and sorts genuine asylum seekers from economic migrants.
Very few would want those genuinely at risk to be deported.
Why its so ineffective? Maybe lack of funds and staff? Maybe interpretation of the act? Mostly inertia IMO.
I believe its time to re-look at the refugee act root and branch.
It seems pretty much every country in the world outside the West is unsafe to live in.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 2, 2023 6:37:51 GMT
I'm always amazed how we give asylum to all these people fleeing their home countries because they are unsafe to live in, but then it appears that they are safe enough for them to go back there on holiday..
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on May 2, 2023 7:26:05 GMT
I'm always amazed how we give asylum to all these people fleeing their home countries because they are unsafe to live in, but then it appears that they are safe enough for them to go back there on holiday.. Incisive comment.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 2, 2023 18:52:51 GMT
I'm always amazed how we give asylum to all these people fleeing their home countries because they are unsafe to live in, but then it appears that they are safe enough for them to go back there on holiday.. Not sure how many that applies to.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 2, 2023 20:04:19 GMT
I'm always amazed how we give asylum to all these people fleeing their home countries because they are unsafe to live in, but then it appears that they are safe enough for them to go back there on holiday.. Not sure how many that applies to. Not sure how many this applies to but it does seem to be rife and comes with the influx where young women are sexually assaulted in the middle of the day and on public transport. Something for locals at Bexhill to look forward to as they go through the enrichment process. The left seem singularly unbothered by this. “Africa in Peschiera” Wreaks Havoc in Towns Around Lake Garda. europeanconservative.com/articles/news/africa-in-peschiera-wreaks-havoc-in-towns-around-lake-garda/
|
|