Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2023 12:24:46 GMT
Saville was protected by the Tories. Saville was committing crimes during Labour and Tory governments. The Queen was on the throne as well. He was friends with the Tories. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 4, 2023 12:28:11 GMT
Saville was committing crimes during Labour and Tory governments. The Queen was on the throne as well. He was friends with the Tories. Ok I’ll try again. Labour was in power while Saville was committing crimes . Are you saying that the collective Labour Party was so stupid that it didn’t know about Savilles crimes? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 4, 2023 12:55:38 GMT
The Queen was on the throne as well. He was friends with the Tories. Ok I’ll try again. Labour was in power while Saville was committing crimes . Are you saying that the collective Labour Party was so stupid that it didn’t know about Savilles crimes? Do you have proof they did? Or is your post just another example of nasty right-wing insinuation. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2023 12:59:40 GMT
The Queen was on the throne as well. He was friends with the Tories. Ok I’ll try again. Labour was in power while Saville was committing crimes . Are you saying that the collective Labour Party was so stupid that it didn’t know about Savilles crimes? Did the police? Savile was a friend of the Conservatives. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 4, 2023 13:01:05 GMT
NORMAL people would watch the video einstein. The video no longer works. Even so Starmer explained Corbyn was not a drinking social style friend, just friendly political exchanges inside the Party. Maybe one day you will start to think for yourself, then you just might be in a position to insult others. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 4, 2023 13:03:29 GMT
Ok I’ll try again. Labour was in power while Saville was committing crimes . Are you saying that the collective Labour Party was so stupid that it didn’t know about Savilles crimes? Savile was a friend of the Conservatives. Why don't you ask them? They were known as the Friday Morning Club. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 4, 2023 13:07:37 GMT
But you prefer shit from the mail, nothing new there  Pure trolling, nothing to add to the thread. Is this how some react when their Blairite darling is bang to rights on flip flopping on a major issue? Don't be silly, there was no problem arising from the video, I think you flip flopped instead of thinking before you posted. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 4, 2023 13:08:09 GMT
Ok I’ll try again. Labour was in power while Saville was committing crimes . Are you saying that the collective Labour Party was so stupid that it didn’t know about Savilles crimes? Did the police? Savile was a friend of the Conservatives. Don’t try to wriggle out of your accusation. If Saville was not friends with Labour then there are two reasons why they didn’t react to his crimes 1 they were too stupid to know . 2 they couldn’t be bothered or were incapable . You choose. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 4, 2023 13:09:25 GMT
Ok I’ll try again. Labour was in power while Saville was committing crimes . Are you saying that the collective Labour Party was so stupid that it didn’t know about Savilles crimes? Do you have proof they did? Or is your post just another example of nasty right-wing insinuation. Ask your carer what question marks mean and when they eventually get you to understand maybe you could read the relevant posts . |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 4, 2023 13:11:29 GMT
Did the police? Savile was a friend of the Conservatives. Don’t try to wriggle out of your accusation. If Saville was not friends with Labour then there are two reasons why they didn’t react to his crimes 1 they were too stupid to know . 2 they couldn’t be bothered or were incapable . You choose. or 3 they had paedos in Labour who they didn't want exposing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 4, 2023 13:13:09 GMT
Don’t try to wriggle out of your accusation. If Saville was not friends with Labour then there are two reasons why they didn’t react to his crimes 1 they were too stupid to know . 2 they couldn’t be bothered or were incapable . You choose. or 3 they had paedos in Labour who they didn't want exposing.
Good point . |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 4, 2023 13:14:04 GMT
The Liberal party had it's very own Cyril Smith, so they said nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 4, 2023 13:15:49 GMT
Don’t try to wriggle out of your accusation. If Saville was not friends with Labour then there are two reasons why they didn’t react to his crimes 1 they were too stupid to know . 2 they couldn’t be bothered or were incapable . You choose. or 3 they had paedos in Labour who they didn't want exposing.
Duplicate post |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 4, 2023 13:16:03 GMT
Starmer hates it when we are reminded of his times as DPP, how inept he was, one of the reasons Saville got of scott free, was watching a interview the other night with Saville with Andrew Neil of all people, he normally grills people, it was clear back then in 1995 he was a dirty peodo, and people like him are still protected by the establishment. Stop insinuating outright lies. Its just nasty. The people who protected Saville were those who worked with or by him and knew what he was doing. No one knows just who those people were or what their political allegiances were. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 4, 2023 13:19:46 GMT
Starmer hates it when we are reminded of his times as DPP, how inept he was, one of the reasons Saville got of scott free, was watching a interview the other night with Saville with Andrew Neil of all people, he normally grills people, it was clear back then in 1995 he was a dirty peodo, and people like him are still protected by the establishment. Stop insinuating outright lies. Its just nasty. The people who protected Saville were those who worked with or by him and knew what he was doing. No one knows just who those people were or what their political allegiances were. When the insinuations are made at Labour See2 objects. When they are made at the Tories see2 ignores it . Hypocrisy? |
|
