|
Post by jonksy on Apr 10, 2023 20:02:47 GMT
Putin wouldn't have invaded the Ukrain if Trump had still been president. And US relations would have been far better with North Korea also. That's because Trump has said he'd have made a deal that allowed Russia to claim parts of Ukraine - something I don't think Ukraine would have agreed to. "Putin was waiting on a "wink" from former U.S. President Donald Trump to seize parts of Ukraine—years before Russia launched a full-scale invasion. Paul Manafort, who headed Trump's campaign for a few months in 2016 and was convicted of fraud and conspiracy charges, worked with Russian and Moscow-backed Ukrainian figures, including Kremlin aide Konstantin Kilimnik "Kilimnik and Manafort formed a close and lasting relationship that would endure to the 2016 U.S. elections and beyond," the Senate Intelligence Committee report said. Manafort "discussed with Kilimnik a peace plan for eastern Ukraine that benefited the Kremlin," the report said. The pair pursued "the pro-Russia Ukraine peace plan Kilimnik had first raised with Manafort" in August 2016 after the election, according to the report. Trump has repeatedly weighed in on how he would handle the ongoing war in Ukraine, saying he could end the war within 24 hours. Last month, Trump signaled that he would have "made a deal" for Moscow to claim parts of Ukraine, had he been in power when the Russian invasion took place. "At worst, I could have made a deal to take over something, you know, there are certain areas that are Russian speaking areas, right, like, but you could have worked a deal.
Written correspondence between former Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort and Kilimnik discussed Putin claiming part of Ukraine, saying that a "wink" from the Republican former president was needed to "make this work."
www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/putin-was-waiting-on-wink-from-donald-trump-to-seize-ukraine-author/ar-AA19FPBG?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=f66f5e68f77840a08154eee73e8189c8&ei=15Trump could only have averted the invasion if Ukraine had agreed to give up territory to Russia. Given Ukraine's unflinching response to the invasion, I highly doubt they'd have capitulated. The invasion would have happened anyway, only Trump was never going to send support to Ukraine. He was on Putin's side. Trump never stated that...
|
|
|
Post by Ripley on Apr 10, 2023 20:19:28 GMT
That's because Trump has said he'd have made a deal that allowed Russia to claim parts of Ukraine - something I don't think Ukraine would have agreed to. "Putin was waiting on a "wink" from former U.S. President Donald Trump to seize parts of Ukraine—years before Russia launched a full-scale invasion. Paul Manafort, who headed Trump's campaign for a few months in 2016 and was convicted of fraud and conspiracy charges, worked with Russian and Moscow-backed Ukrainian figures, including Kremlin aide Konstantin Kilimnik "Kilimnik and Manafort formed a close and lasting relationship that would endure to the 2016 U.S. elections and beyond," the Senate Intelligence Committee report said. Manafort "discussed with Kilimnik a peace plan for eastern Ukraine that benefited the Kremlin," the report said. The pair pursued "the pro-Russia Ukraine peace plan Kilimnik had first raised with Manafort" in August 2016 after the election, according to the report. Trump has repeatedly weighed in on how he would handle the ongoing war in Ukraine, saying he could end the war within 24 hours. Last month, Trump signaled that he would have "made a deal" for Moscow to claim parts of Ukraine, had he been in power when the Russian invasion took place. "At worst, I could have made a deal to take over something, you know, there are certain areas that are Russian speaking areas, right, like, but you could have worked a deal.
Written correspondence between former Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort and Kilimnik discussed Putin claiming part of Ukraine, saying that a "wink" from the Republican former president was needed to "make this work."
www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/putin-was-waiting-on-wink-from-donald-trump-to-seize-ukraine-author/ar-AA19FPBG?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=f66f5e68f77840a08154eee73e8189c8&ei=15Trump could only have averted the invasion if Ukraine had agreed to give up territory to Russia. Given Ukraine's unflinching response to the invasion, I highly doubt they'd have capitulated. The invasion would have happened anyway, only Trump was never going to send support to Ukraine. He was on Putin's side. Trump never stated that...Oh, yes he did! Listen to Trump's radio interview with his friend Sean Hannity. At around the .51 mark, he says exactly what the article above says he did. First, he says he is the only president in whose administration Russia didn't take any of Ukraine. Then he says: "At worst, I could have made a deal to take over something, you know, there are certain areas that are Russian speaking areas, right, like, but you could have worked a deal."
Fox News later edited out the admission. www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-edits-out-donald-trump-saying-he-mightve-let-russia-take-over-parts-of-ukraineShocked Silence!
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2023 0:49:42 GMT
Trump never stated that... Oh, yes he did! Listen to Trump's radio interview with his friend Sean Hannity. At around the .51 mark, he says exactly what the article above says he did. First, he says he is the only president in whose administration Russia didn't take any of Ukraine. Then he says: "At worst, I could have made a deal to take over something, you know, there are certain areas that are Russian speaking areas, right, like, but you could have worked a deal."
Fox News later edited out the admission. www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-edits-out-donald-trump-saying-he-mightve-let-russia-take-over-parts-of-ukraineShocked Silence! Ah the good ol daily beast. For the usual lefty braindead morons.
|
|
|
Post by Ripley on Apr 11, 2023 14:21:18 GMT
Oh, yes he did! Listen to Trump's radio interview with his friend Sean Hannity. At around the .51 mark, he says exactly what the article above says he did. First, he says he is the only president in whose administration Russia didn't take any of Ukraine. Then he says: "At worst, I could have made a deal to take over something, you know, there are certain areas that are Russian speaking areas, right, like, but you could have worked a deal."
Fox News later edited out the admission. www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-edits-out-donald-trump-saying-he-mightve-let-russia-take-over-parts-of-ukraineShocked Silence! Ah the good ol daily beast. For the usual lefty braindead morons. So you heard Trump say it with your own ears but dismiss the truth because don't like the source? They published the truth while Fox News edited out the admission that Trump was willing to let Russia take parts of Ukraine. Fox is in a world of legal trouble for broadcasting fake news. Suppressing the truth is more of the same.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2023 14:24:22 GMT
Ah the good ol daily beast. For the usual lefty braindead morons. So you heard Trump say it with your own ears but dismiss the truth because don't like the source? They published the truth while Fox News edited out the admission that Trump was willing to let Russia take parts of Ukraine. Fox is in a world of legal trouble for broadcasting fake news. Suppressing the truth is more of the same. No I didn't and neither did your bullshit lefty link.
|
|
|
Post by Ripley on Apr 11, 2023 14:59:12 GMT
So you heard Trump say it with your own ears but dismiss the truth because don't like the source? They published the truth while Fox News edited out the admission that Trump was willing to let Russia take parts of Ukraine. Fox is in a world of legal trouble for broadcasting fake news. Suppressing the truth is more of the same. No I didn't and neither did your bullshit lefty link. What are you implying?
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2023 15:05:30 GMT
No I didn't and neither did your bullshit lefty link. What are you implying? That the twats who support Repubilicans are blatant liars...You are making such a bloody fuss over Biden infesting NI which will cost bloddy millions and he is content not to mention the fact that he has a wealth of English ancestors. But what else can we expect from the lying dribbling old fart?
|
|
|
Post by Ripley on Apr 11, 2023 15:13:12 GMT
That the twats who support Repubilicans are blatant liars...You are making such a bloody fuss over Biden infesting NI which will cost bloddy millions and he is content not to mention the fact that he has a wealth of English ancestors. But what else can we expect from the lying dribbling old fart? Did you really mean to say that before trying to change the subject from Trump's peace plan for Ukraine to Biden? All right, then, by all means stick your fingers in your ears as protection from unpalatable truths.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2023 15:16:30 GMT
That the twats who support Repubilicans are blatant liars...You are making such a bloody fuss over Biden infesting NI which will cost bloddy millions and he is content not to mention the fact that he has a wealth of English ancestors. But what else can we expect from the lying dribbling old fart? Did you really mean to say that before trying to change the subject from Trump's peace plan for Ukraine to Biden? All right, then, by all means stick your fingers in your ears as protection from unpalatable truths. Not trying to change anything. Just stating facts that you don't seem to like...You were the one who started onother thread over the dribbling old farts visit to NI.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 11, 2023 16:08:30 GMT
Oh, yes he did! Listen to Trump's radio interview with his friend Sean Hannity. At around the .51 mark, he says exactly what the article above says he did. First, he says he is the only president in whose administration Russia didn't take any of Ukraine. Then he says: "At worst, I could have made a deal to take over something, you know, there are certain areas that are Russian speaking areas, right, like, but you could have worked a deal."
Fox News later edited out the admission. www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-edits-out-donald-trump-saying-he-mightve-let-russia-take-over-parts-of-ukraineShocked Silence! Ah the good ol daily beast. For the usual lefty braindead morons. From someone who allows the Mail to do their thinking for them ^^.
|
|
|
Post by borchester on Apr 11, 2023 16:14:09 GMT
Joe Biden has reportedly turned down his invitation to King Charles III’s coronation, which is set for 6 May. The US president is “not expected” to be in the UK for the King’s big day, according to sources who spoke to The Telegraph. The sources, who have reportedly been involved in the discussion with Biden about the coronation, claimed that he will be sending a delegation in his place. However, there is a possibility that the First Lady of the United States, Jill Biden, will be in attendance. www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/joe-biden-king-charles-coronation-b2312119.htmlThis, in my opinion, is because he was forced to wait for a seat at the Queens funeral (because he was late) and he knows he wont be the centre of attention. My thinking is, good I'm glad history will record the fact that Biden, a pro IRA English hater, wasn't present at the Kings coronation. Good point.
Joe Finnegan is like that relative that you invite to all the weddings and social events because that is what you do, all the while hoping the little bastard won't show up. Happily, it looks as though he won't
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 11, 2023 16:42:38 GMT
Joe Biden has reportedly turned down his invitation to King Charles III’s coronation, which is set for 6 May. The US president is “not expected” to be in the UK for the King’s big day, according to sources who spoke to The Telegraph. The sources, who have reportedly been involved in the discussion with Biden about the coronation, claimed that he will be sending a delegation in his place. However, there is a possibility that the First Lady of the United States, Jill Biden, will be in attendance. www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/joe-biden-king-charles-coronation-b2312119.htmlThis, in my opinion, is because he was forced to wait for a seat at the Queens funeral (because he was late) and he knows he wont be the centre of attention. My thinking is, good I'm glad history will record the fact that Biden, a pro IRA English hater, wasn't present at the Kings coronation. Good point.
Joe Finnegan is like that relative that you invite to all the weddings and social events because that is what you do, all the while hoping the little bastard won't show up. Happily, it looks as though he won't
Not to mention that Trump took the piss out of him, by saying if he had been President he wouldn't have been stuck on the 16th row ... LOL
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Apr 11, 2023 17:27:00 GMT
Why don't Joe leave the Irish in peace nobody likes him anyway, so stirring up trouble in the American tradition won't go down well.
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Apr 11, 2023 17:38:24 GMT
Four suspected Pipe Bombs have been found in a cemetery in the Creggan area of Londonderry
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 11, 2023 17:45:49 GMT
Why don't Joe leave the Irish in peace nobody likes him anyway, so stirring up trouble in the American tradition won't go down well. Like the Irish need that old fool stumbling around everywhere, he already sound like he's downed 10 pints of Guinness.
|
|