|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 20, 2023 3:41:36 GMT
Sue Gray accused of holding secret talks to join Labour while she was advising government on Partygate at the same time sparking calls for inquiry from Tory MPs Ms Gray was approached by Labour in November last year, it was claimed.
Sue Gray was advising the Government on the Partygate inquiry into Boris Johnson while holding secret talks about joining Labour, it was claimed last night.
In an extraordinary development, it emerged Ms Gray was approached by Labour in November last year, at least three months before her controversial appointment as Sir Keir Starmer's chief of staff became public.
Whitehall sources told the Daily Mail the timeline means she was still advising the Government on the contentious inquiry into Mr Johnson's conduct while secretly talking about moving to Labour HQ.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 20, 2023 7:51:15 GMT
She has done massive damage to the Civil Service's reputation for impartiality - can any Minister really trust the advice they are given by their staff now?.
Perhaps time to remove the Civil Servents and go the American route with departmental staff brought in from outside to implement government policy.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 20, 2023 8:52:32 GMT
She has done massive damage to the Civil Service's reputation for impartiality - can any Minister really trust the advice they are given by their staff now?. Perhaps time to remove the Civil Servents and go the American route with departmental staff brought in from outside to implement government policy. No wonder they are thought by many as snivel serpents. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2023 8:55:04 GMT
Oh dear more crap from the Mail.
They make no reference to the fact that her investigation was complete which is shown by the fact that she was advising on what she had already completed.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 20, 2023 9:10:05 GMT
There appears to be nothing more than insinuations and claims, which would be so typical of and expected from right-wing nasties. Insinuation is one of the trade marks of the nasties.
Let's see some actual evidence with times, dates, quotes and names, of the claims of her so called wrongdoings, then there might be some need for people to be concerned. Otherwise its just Maily right-wing garbage.
Sadly even if there is nothing to it some of the mud thrown will stick, and that would be the sickness of the Righties and the stupidity of the easily led.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 20, 2023 9:13:23 GMT
She has done massive damage to the Civil Service's reputation for impartiality - can any Minister really trust the advice they are given by their staff now?. Perhaps time to remove the Civil Servents and go the American route with departmental staff brought in from outside to implement government policy. No wonder they are thought by many as snivel serpents. It is long understood that those who spend much of their time denigrating others, are just trying to boost their own lack of self-assurance. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 20, 2023 9:16:42 GMT
She has done massive damage to the Civil Service's reputation for impartiality - can any Minister really trust the advice they are given by their staff now?. Perhaps time to remove the Civil Servents and go the American route with departmental staff brought in from outside to implement government policy. Hmm, so now you are the judge and the jury all in one. Thank goodness you have no power or authority in running either the country or the judiciary. |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Mar 20, 2023 9:22:20 GMT
She has done massive damage to the Civil Service's reputation for impartiality - can any Minister really trust the advice they are given by their staff now?. Perhaps time to remove the Civil Servents and go the American route with departmental staff brought in from outside to implement government policy. Hmm, so now you are the judge and the jury all in one. Thank goodness you have no power or authority in running either the country or the judiciary. Until he progresses from Prince Pacifico to King Pacifico; meanwhile you will still be see2, an inconsequential.  |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 20, 2023 10:30:51 GMT
Oh dear more crap from the Mail. They make no reference to the fact that her investigation was complete which is shown by the fact that she was advising on what she had already completed.
It matters not. The whole episode still casts massive doubt on her alleged impartiality.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 20, 2023 10:54:40 GMT
The old hag should be facing a disciplinary inquiry.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 20, 2023 11:20:49 GMT
Her report was completed in May 2022. What's your point caller?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 20, 2023 11:22:45 GMT
Her report was completed in May 2022. What's your point caller? She was in cahoots with the Labour leader at the time, it was supposed to be a 'impartial' inquiry, how could it possibly be impartial when she's colluding with the accuser. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 20, 2023 11:32:52 GMT
It wasn't at the same time though, was it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 20, 2023 11:34:27 GMT
It wasn't at the same time though, was it? So are you trying to tell us they only struck up this friendship 'after' the inquiry? LOL
come on andrew we know you're not the sharpest tool in the box, but it's not hard to work it out.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Mar 20, 2023 11:39:17 GMT
Her report was completed in May 2022. What's your point caller? So in your heart of hearts you believe everything is fine about it? |
|
