|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 13, 2023 12:46:35 GMT
Green light for the BBC to interfere and influence General Election outcomes, the leftie elite are determined to get Starmer into No10, it's a establishment stitch up, and the BBC are using our licence fees to promote the Labour party, and endorse people traffickers going about their business, at the cost of human life, and costing £6 million a day that could go towards funding the NHS, that Labour are using as a political football... what does Starmer think about costing £6 million a DAY, that could be used to fund the NHS? I just put a link to a poll mate where 93% do not want lineker on their screens I suppose the usual karens on the board will vote out of tune as they always do.. Thanks jonks I've signed it, and I am seriously debating cancelling my tv licence fee, when they come after me for payment I will tell them why I am refusing to pay, I want no part of my hard earned cash going towards a political mouthpieces salary, at the same time giving Jug ears a BBC platform to spout his bias political views. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 13, 2023 12:46:36 GMT
Green light for the BBC to interfere and influence General Election outcomes, the leftie elite are determined to get Starmer into No10, it's a establishment stitch up, and the BBC are using our licence fees to promote the Labour party, and endorse people traffickers going about their business, at the cost of human life, and costing £6 million a day that could go towards funding the NHS, that Labour are using as a political football... what does Starmer think about costing £6 million a DAY, that could be used to fund the NHS? I just put a link to a poll mate where 93% do not want lineker on their screens I suppose the usual karens on the board will vote out of tune as they always do.. I suppose the usual Tories voted in your posted poll. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 13, 2023 12:49:11 GMT
I just put a link to a poll mate where 93% do not want lineker on their screens I suppose the usual karens on the board will vote out of tune as they always do.. Thanks jonks I've signed it, and I am seriously debating cancelling my tv licence fee, when they come after me for payment I will tell them why I am refusing to pay, I want no part of my hard earned cash going towards a political mouthpieces salary, at the same time giving Jug ears a BBC platform to spout his bias political views. Well it is endorsed by the biden tribute so you know you have done the right thing mate...There is no higher acolade than that.. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 13, 2023 12:50:13 GMT
I suspect that so called “gammons’ pay more tv licence fee than young lefties.
The anti licence fee brigade will pick up on this imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 13, 2023 12:55:08 GMT
Thanks jonks I've signed it, and I am seriously debating cancelling my tv licence fee, when they come after me for payment I will tell them why I am refusing to pay, I want no part of my hard earned cash going towards a political mouthpieces salary, at the same time giving Jug ears a BBC platform to spout his bias political views. Well it is endorsed by the biden tribute so you know you have done the right thing mate...There is no higher acolade than that.. It was nonsense put up by a dictator minded knob-head. Your trumpishness make a monkey out of you again. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Mar 13, 2023 12:55:34 GMT
I would go quite a bit further than merely removing the licence fee powers.
I feel the BBC's IP should be taken fully into public custody for its protection as an archive. This IP could be rented out to the highest/ most suitable bidder and the funds put into general taxation.
|
|
|
|
Post by om15 on Mar 13, 2023 13:08:47 GMT
Doubt it, can't see Labour doing anything about it, nor will Labour Lite Ricky, it will be forgotten about until Lineker carefully choosing his words calls more Conservatives Nazis when he will receive another apology from the BBC.
Lineker is entitled to his opinions about things, as indeed are we entitled to an opinion about Lineker.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2023 14:08:04 GMT
We have an international agreement with other countries to accept and process refugees in the UK no matter how they get here. They're not all refugees, they only claim they are. That's why they need to be processed something the Tories are quite deliberately not doing. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2023 14:12:01 GMT
Explain to me, carefully, what was idiotic about my post. Migrants do have the right to enter the UK by irregular means. Ukrainians passed through safe countries to get to the UK. I already did in one single sentence . If you are not capable of understanding that single sentence or are being deliberately obtuse then it’s a pointless exercise. I’ve caught you lying in the past and pointed out where you were lying but you still carried on lying . So I don’t expect honest debate from you . So I am lying about the international law that states quite clearly that all asylum seekers have the right to go to any country they wish and not be penalised for doing so? Do grow up. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 13, 2023 14:13:46 GMT
I already did in one single sentence . If you are not capable of understanding that single sentence or are being deliberately obtuse then it’s a pointless exercise. I’ve caught you lying in the past and pointed out where you were lying but you still carried on lying . So I don’t expect honest debate from you . So I am lying about the international law that states quite clearly that all asylum seekers have the right to go to any country they wish and not be penalised for doing so? Do grow up. Where does it stipulate to include 'illegal' migrants coming from a safe country? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 13, 2023 14:14:48 GMT
I already did in one single sentence . If you are not capable of understanding that single sentence or are being deliberately obtuse then it’s a pointless exercise. I’ve caught you lying in the past and pointed out where you were lying but you still carried on lying . So I don’t expect honest debate from you . So I am lying about the international law that states quite clearly that all asylum seekers have the right to go to any country they wish and not be penalised for doing so? Do grow up. I can hear the squeak of those goal posts being moved and the cogs in your brain inventing even more ways to perform your third rate sophistry. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 13, 2023 14:47:58 GMT
Here is yet another total waste of oxygen that the beep bosses piss taxpayers money against the wall with, by imploying the useless bitch.... BBC Question Time host Fiona Bruce says she will step back from role as ambassador for charity Refuge after she was accused of 'trivialising' domestic abuse over Stanley Johnson 'wife-beater' claims Fiona Bruce has stepped back as an ambassador of domestic abuse charity Refuge following claims she had trivialised domestic violence during a discussion about Stanley Johnson on Question Time. The presenter of the BBC politics show faced a social media backlash after intervening when the 82-year-old father of former prime minister Boris Johnson was talked about on Thursday night. In a statement, Bruce said that she was 'required to legally contextualise' a response about Mr Johnson and the words are not an expression of her own opinions and she would never minimise domestic abuse. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11854069/Question-Time-host-Fiona-Bruce-says-step-Refuge-role.html#comments |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 13, 2023 14:51:15 GMT
Here is yet another total waste of oxygen that the beep bosses piss taxpayers money against the wall with, by imploying the useless bitch.... BBC Question Time host Fiona Bruce says she will step back from role as ambassador for charity Refuge after she was accused of 'trivialising' domestic abuse over Stanley Johnson 'wife-beater' claims Fiona Bruce has stepped back as an ambassador of domestic abuse charity Refuge following claims she had trivialised domestic violence during a discussion about Stanley Johnson on Question Time. The presenter of the BBC politics show faced a social media backlash after intervening when the 82-year-old father of former prime minister Boris Johnson was talked about on Thursday night. In a statement, Bruce said that she was 'required to legally contextualise' a response about Mr Johnson and the words are not an expression of her own opinions and she would never minimise domestic abuse. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11854069/Question-Time-host-Fiona-Bruce-says-step-Refuge-role.html#commentsIf only we could stick her and jug ears on dinghy back to France, I'd pay the people traffickers myself. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 13, 2023 14:53:44 GMT
Here is yet another total waste of oxygen that the beep bosses piss taxpayers money against the wall with, by imploying the useless bitch.... BBC Question Time host Fiona Bruce says she will step back from role as ambassador for charity Refuge after she was accused of 'trivialising' domestic abuse over Stanley Johnson 'wife-beater' claims Fiona Bruce has stepped back as an ambassador of domestic abuse charity Refuge following claims she had trivialised domestic violence during a discussion about Stanley Johnson on Question Time. The presenter of the BBC politics show faced a social media backlash after intervening when the 82-year-old father of former prime minister Boris Johnson was talked about on Thursday night. In a statement, Bruce said that she was 'required to legally contextualise' a response about Mr Johnson and the words are not an expression of her own opinions and she would never minimise domestic abuse. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11854069/Question-Time-host-Fiona-Bruce-says-step-Refuge-role.html#commentsIf only we could stick her and jug ears on dinghy back to France, I'd pay the people traffickers myself. I wonder if the usual braindead karens will fight her corner? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2023 15:34:35 GMT
Yes I will fight her corner
As with all BBC presenters involved with politics, she simply played "Devils Advocate" in order to prompt debate, or a response.
What makes this particularly ridiculous is the fact that Fiona Bruce has supported and worked for the charity "Refuge" for many years, making it an absurd suggestion that she somehow "trivialised violence against women".
Its getting to a situation now where public figures dare not open their mouths for it been wrongly interpreted
|
|
