Gary Linekar Nazi slur...

No it wasn't.

It is everything including Britishness. Why would British people not want to remain British people. What is special about British people that they alone amongst all the world,s peoples must not be allowed to remain what they wish to be. Jews can be Jews, Palestinians can be Palestinians, Native Americans can be Native Americans. Kurds can be Kurds. WE allow all sorts of peoples to be themselves in our Multicultural wonderland. Why would you deny the right of British people to be British, and predominantly British, in Britain. Perhaps that is your motive, and that of the left, overcome the British, swamp them with incomers against their will and change the country. It has changed as I have indicated. If it was a deliberate policy it was no different to the Nazis trying to engineer the society they wanted, if it was accidental it was negligence on a grand scale and criminally so. Your last point indicates that this outcome is what you desire which indicates ideology no different from the Nazis in enforcing change on peoples. No good will come of it and it paints a picture of generations of strife. You would think history teaches us that when you consider Ireland just for one.

Indeed natural evolution is widely accepted and if black and white choose independently to procreate that is not any sort of problem if one believes in the rights of the individual. This thread indicates that that view apparently is at the forefront of the thinking of the left. Until that individual is a white British citizen. Then those rights disappear and he must accept what is imposed on him by International Law with the connivance of his own 'sovereign' parliament.
Those low level genocidal urges come very much to the fore in some unrestrained moments when the mask slips and those adherents to the CRT see the demise of whiteness as distinctly positive.

Of course change is inevitable. However, I see no particular reason why the targets of your eradication program wouldn't / shouldn't tell you to jump out of ninth story window

Eradication??

Culture is being attacked through revisionist history, denigration of all that was and is British and through the  targeting of anything existing now that was in anyway associated with colonialism or Empire. There are many who carry this out and many who buy into the narrative. It is done by concentrating only on the British part of any unpleasant parts of history, ignoring the part played by others, adopting language that misdirects (and this thread is about the use of language which the left are seemingly very sensitive about when it suits) and seeking removal of any offending artifact, rewriting of books and education.

 Let us take one small example that illustrates the tale, there are many more. David Olusoga in his statement to the jury in the Colston trial as an expert witness was inaccurate in his statements. He used the terms 'into slavery' and 'enslavement' frequently when testifying yet these are emotive words and inaccurate. Into slavery implies that they were taken as free people and transported to become slaves and enslavement implies that the act of making them slaves was carried out by Colston. They were already slaves before they arrived at the trading point, they were enslaved by other Africans and Arab traders and they were transported as slaves not into slavery. The Barbary pirates transported people into slavery they did not buy slaves from French and Cornish citizens of already enslaved peoples.