Meet the next PM... God help us...

As I said, and as you insist upon further demonstrating here, in order to cling to your desired ideological assumptions, you are having to resort to conspiracy theories, apparently believing in some form of international cabal plotting to prevent your beloved tax cuts on a global scale. Lol

It demonstrably was not civil servants who tanked the economy but the markets.

Have you no sense of irony with that statement? Appearing as you seem to to believe in a conspiracy theory in which an international cabal of civil servants, aided and abetted by the financial markets are acting to prevent the cutting of taxes.

All because you cannot accept that uncosted tax cuts spooked the markets. Indeed elsewhere you spent ages trying to tell us that tax cuts come for free and thus don't need to be costed. And you seemingly cannot accept that the markets who deal in reality don't agree with that nonsensical ideological assumption. This apparently does not compute in your head and thus is only explicable by invoking some sort of international conspiracy.

Yet it is obvious to most of us that the far more likely explanation is that your ideological assumptions are wrong.

You can have tax cuts and/or spending increases, but they need to be costed. Unfunded giveaways will not generate growth. You need the growth first before you can afford giveaways without austerity, this latter tending to shrink the economy and impede growth of itself. The big question is how to stimulate growth without unfunded giveaways. Moves to encourage investment in business activity instead of in bricks and mortar might be a good place to start

Swap the word "millionaire" for senior doctors, surgeons, engineers and see if you feel better...

There is a specific problem of exceptionally qualified people retiring EARLY because their pension pot is full.

It is pretty stupid of Labour to turn it into a anti-rich populist argument.  Encouraging retired nurses back is a separate issue.

It's not like they are handing a massive tax dodge to "millionaires".  They will simply end up paying the tax later when they draw their pension... that is how pensions work.

There has NEVER been a "trickle-down" policy, because "trickle-down" is a made up label that some people use to describe capitalism.

Conservatism is not about making the rich richer, or keeping people down.  It is about personal responsibility... ie it is up to the individual to make their own life a success.  The problem with this is that there is a huge part of society that has little or no personal responsibility, so you need social policies to protect / help them.

This is why most people shift from left to right over their life time.  Life is tough when you are young so you lean to the left.  You work hard, see the results and by the time you are 50 you think fuck me I'm a Tory.  Unless you drift through life, then you hit 50, have little to show for it, and still think life is unfair and move to the far left lol.  This is why the Tories normally win... they are the party of protecting what you have personally achieved.

The Tories are about to get a slap in the face because they have drifted too far away from the middle.  This is normally the time when Labour come in and strengthen the social policies.  Good luck with that this time though.  Starmer sounds more like a Tory than Rishi does lol.

This is basic stuff, if you don't understand this then god help you.

The next general election is now less than two years away, probably 21 months away, and there seems to be no sign of any movement in the polls, with the Labour lead still averaging 20 points.

Its worth bearing in mind that a lead of half the present showing would still see a Labour government.

It will take much more than some signs of economic recovery to move these figures into a position where the Conservatives can safely go into a general election. I am convinced that for a lot of people its just weariness of 13 years of cuts to public services, a country divided like never before due to Brexit, the state of the NHS, a corrupt and lying Boris Johnson, another leader who almost wrecked the economy, the cost of living crisis and I feel that many people just think its time for a change.

I wouldn't worry about it.  It was a sure Labour victory when slimey hypocrite Kinnock was leader, and they still lost.

Now you're comparing chalk and cheese. The public might well cause a panic bank run if persuaded their money will disappear, maybe even through rumour mongering. 
But a pension company would not stop buying government bonds on the basis of a rumour. 
Further there was no need for any rumour, the facts were out there for all to see. Liz Truss refused to call it a budget, to avoid scrutiny. She stopped the OBR looking at it to avoid scrutiny and it was a completely alien concept to the investment market. No need for any rumour.