|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 4, 2023 23:37:35 GMT
BS ^ Sweden (which did eventually realise the need for a lockdown) 2,320 deaths per million Norway 946 per million Denmark 1,419, Iceland 663 www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#main_table There's a reason Sweden did worse than comparable countries Your link is just to a covid death tracker and at the best misleading and at the worst just blatant bullshit. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 4, 2023 23:37:49 GMT
So what are all these people employed in the NHS supposed to be doing if its up to the Government to manage their PPE stocks? You would think all minsister have nothing else todo than sit there and wip out the american express card when it is needed. __"About a third of doctors and nurses, including those working in the riskiest areas of hospitals with COVID-19 patients, complained they were given inadequate protective equipment as the pandemic swept across Britain earlier this year. There were insufficient supplies of gowns and visors , the National Audit Office (NAO) said in a report. " despite warnings from some of the government’s top scientific advisers last year that they should be increasedwww.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-britain-ppe-idUSKBN285007 |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 4, 2023 23:39:20 GMT
BS ^ Sweden (which did eventually realise the need for a lockdown) 2,320 deaths per million Norway 946 per million Denmark 1,419, Iceland 663 www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#main_table There's a reason Sweden did worse than comparable countries Steve you know that's bollox. Deaths during coronavirus does not mean deaths due to coronavirus. As the enquiry will show, many deaths that during the pandemic were attributed to coronavirus, were unrelated to the virus. FFS there was a case in the UK of where a man left hospital after having had the virus and was killed on his way home with a bus. |
|
|
|
Post by thescotsman on Mar 4, 2023 23:51:55 GMT
Some posters will argue that Night is day or that black is white ... but the very simple fact is that our NHS always deteriorates under a Tory government, and improves under a Labour government, a FACT that is indisputable. The last time Labour inherited a run down NHS, it took several years to turn it around, but they did turn it around. The present deterioration of our most cherished public service began well before anyone had ever heard of Covid19In 2010 a GP appointment was obtainable in two or three days, now its two or three weeks Who would have ever believed that it could regularly take well over an hour for an ambulance to arrive after dialing 999 to report a suspected heart attack. THe excusers for this government can come up with whatever Bull Shit and excuses they want, but the state of our NHS is totally unacceptable, and the Tories will be gone at the next election. oh yeah....the most cherished public service...only in the UK....the country where abysmal is a viable option....jesus fucking christ we have mediocre politicians trying to convince us that the country's health is safe in their hands....and people are still wittering on about labour good ....tories bad....labour bad tories good.....what a bloody joke. People are paying for shit and being told its a national treasure or some such bollocks...its a blood joke....but sure let's keep on with the good labour bad labour good tory bad tory....I suppose its easier than reality.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 4, 2023 23:58:21 GMT
Steve you know that's bollox. Deaths during coronavirus does not mean deaths due to coronavirus. As the enquiry will show, many deaths that during the pandemic were attributed to coronavirus, were unrelated to the virus. FFS there was a case in the UK of where a man left hospital after having had the virus and was killed on his way home with a bus. Indeed, there are many examples of unrelated deaths being counted as covid deaths to bump up the numbers in order to stoke fear, as seen in Hancock's WhatsApp revelations. Christ almighty, and some people trust the government with digital ID and a cashless society. It beggars belief how stupid some people are. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 5, 2023 0:01:06 GMT
oh yeah....the most cherished public service...only in the UK....the country where abysmal is a viable option....jesus fucking christ we have mediocre politicians trying to convince us that the country's health is safe in their hands....and people are still wittering on about labour good ....tories bad....labour bad tories good.....what a bloody joke. People are paying for shit and being told its a national treasure or some such bollocks...its a blood joke....but sure let's keep on with the good labour bad labour good tory bad tory....I suppose its easier than reality. And your answer is what?.. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 5, 2023 0:30:54 GMT
That you will vote for one of them next year...
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 5, 2023 0:32:59 GMT
That you will vote for one of them next year... Who me? Oh dear, you really shouldn't count your chickens Andrew. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 5, 2023 0:51:09 GMT
That you will vote for one of them next year... Dream on... |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 5, 2023 0:52:29 GMT
That you will vote for one of them next year... Who me? Oh dear, you really shouldn't count your chickens Andrew. LOL talk anout turkeys voting for Xmas... |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Mar 5, 2023 6:26:43 GMT
That you will vote for one of them next year... I won't but you almost certainly will and for one of the mainstream parties. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 5, 2023 6:46:53 GMT
That you will vote for one of them next year... I won't but you almost certainly will and for one of the mainstream parties. You are probably right, I've become very much a tactical voter in recent years. |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Mar 5, 2023 6:52:23 GMT
I won't but you almost certainly will and for one of the mainstream parties. You are probably right, I've become very much a tactical voter in recent years. lol, tactical voters shouldn't be voting for the mainstream parties that are hopeless. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 5, 2023 6:59:36 GMT
You are probably right, I've become very much a tactical voter in recent years. lol, tactical voters shouldn't be voting for the mainstream parties that are hopeless. Tactical voting means voting for a party (or individual) who has a chance of winning. By definition, that will almost always be a mainstream party. |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Mar 5, 2023 7:08:58 GMT
lol, tactical voters shouldn't be voting for the mainstream parties that are hopeless. Tactical voting means voting for a party (or individual) who has a chance of winning. By definition, that will almost always be a mainstream party. In some constituences, mine in particular, no party stands a chance of unseating the Tories. Your tactical voting will never do anything but produce a muppet government. |
|
