|
Post by jonksy on Feb 24, 2023 8:05:11 GMT
Five "Missions" and not a single word how he'd achieve them............He was a bag carrier for Corbyn and he supported him for PM. Thats what you need to know..........As usual with Starmer he says everything but explains nothing, hes devoid on policy, idea and any coherent financial plan, hes a liar, a hypocrite and contradicts himself at every turn, and as for his MPs.
Bludgeon us into submission with gobbledegook... The closer Starmer gets to power, the further he retreats into managerial double-speak.
Judge us on our plan, Starmer said, as he unveiled the grand strategy he believes will transport him and his party into power.
We’d love to, Sir Keir, we really would. But at the moment there isn’t a plan.
Yes, there are some vague ambitions. Actually, some ambitious ambitions. A pledge to deliver the highest growth in the G7. To make Britain’s streets safe. To ‘break down barriers to opportunity’. But in terms of the detail of how these lofty goals will be realised, answer comes there none.
When Labour’s leader was first elected, his allies boasted about his ‘forensic’ communications skills, finely honed as a barrister and the Director of Public Prosecutions. Yet the closer he gets to power, the further he retreats into abstraction and managerial double-speak.
The solution to Britain’s problems is, according to Starmer, a government that is ‘more agile, empowering, catalytic’.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 24, 2023 8:23:42 GMT
I felt I was watching an episode of the Office - David Brent brought to life..
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 24, 2023 9:39:52 GMT
Five "Missions" and not a single word how he'd achieve them............He was a bag carrier for Corbyn and he supported him for PM. Thats what you need to know..........As usual with Starmer he says everything but explains nothing, hes devoid on policy, idea and any coherent financial plan, hes a liar, a hypocrite and contradicts himself at every turn, and as for his MPs.
Bludgeon us into submission with gobbledegook... The closer Starmer gets to power, the further he retreats into managerial double-speak.
Judge us on our plan, Starmer said, as he unveiled the grand strategy he believes will transport him and his party into power.
We’d love to, Sir Keir, we really would. But at the moment there isn’t a plan.
Yes, there are some vague ambitions. Actually, some ambitious ambitions. A pledge to deliver the highest growth in the G7. To make Britain’s streets safe. To ‘break down barriers to opportunity’. But in terms of the detail of how these lofty goals will be realised, answer comes there none.
When Labour’s leader was first elected, his allies boasted about his ‘forensic’ communications skills, finely honed as a barrister and the Director of Public Prosecutions. Yet the closer he gets to power, the further he retreats into abstraction and managerial double-speak.
The solution to Britain’s problems is, according to Starmer, a government that is ‘more agile, empowering, catalytic’.
Gobbledegook LOL, I've been searching for a word that sums him up, and that is perfect.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 24, 2023 9:43:28 GMT
Five "Missions" and not a single word how he'd achieve them............He was a bag carrier for Corbyn and he supported him for PM. Thats what you need to know..........As usual with Starmer he says everything but explains nothing, hes devoid on policy, idea and any coherent financial plan, hes a liar, a hypocrite and contradicts himself at every turn, and as for his MPs.
Bludgeon us into submission with gobbledegook... The closer Starmer gets to power, the further he retreats into managerial double-speak.
Judge us on our plan, Starmer said, as he unveiled the grand strategy he believes will transport him and his party into power.
We’d love to, Sir Keir, we really would. But at the moment there isn’t a plan.
Yes, there are some vague ambitions. Actually, some ambitious ambitions. A pledge to deliver the highest growth in the G7. To make Britain’s streets safe. To ‘break down barriers to opportunity’. But in terms of the detail of how these lofty goals will be realised, answer comes there none.
When Labour’s leader was first elected, his allies boasted about his ‘forensic’ communications skills, finely honed as a barrister and the Director of Public Prosecutions. Yet the closer he gets to power, the further he retreats into abstraction and managerial double-speak.
The solution to Britain’s problems is, according to Starmer, a government that is ‘more agile, empowering, catalytic’.
In depending on the Mail you reveal your intentions to fight, distort, insinuate or imply all the nonsense propaganda you can muster against Starmer and the Labour Party. So it would be useless to follow your posts in the hunt for objective information on either. Starmer's '5 missions for a Better Britain' now leaves him wide open to questions and expected answers. So stop complaining.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 24, 2023 9:51:38 GMT
Five "Missions" and not a single word how he'd achieve them............He was a bag carrier for Corbyn and he supported him for PM. Thats what you need to know..........As usual with Starmer he says everything but explains nothing, hes devoid on policy, idea and any coherent financial plan, hes a liar, a hypocrite and contradicts himself at every turn, and as for his MPs.
Bludgeon us into submission with gobbledegook... The closer Starmer gets to power, the further he retreats into managerial double-speak.
Judge us on our plan, Starmer said, as he unveiled the grand strategy he believes will transport him and his party into power.
We’d love to, Sir Keir, we really would. But at the moment there isn’t a plan.
Yes, there are some vague ambitions. Actually, some ambitious ambitions. A pledge to deliver the highest growth in the G7. To make Britain’s streets safe. To ‘break down barriers to opportunity’. But in terms of the detail of how these lofty goals will be realised, answer comes there none.
When Labour’s leader was first elected, his allies boasted about his ‘forensic’ communications skills, finely honed as a barrister and the Director of Public Prosecutions. Yet the closer he gets to power, the further he retreats into abstraction and managerial double-speak.
The solution to Britain’s problems is, according to Starmer, a government that is ‘more agile, empowering, catalytic’.
In depending on the Mail you reveal your intentions to fight, distort, insinuate or imply all the nonsense propaganda you can muster against Starmer and the Labour Party. So it would be useless to follow your posts in the hunt for objective information on either. Starmer's '5 missions for a Better Britain' now leaves him wide open to questions and expected answers. So stop complaining. I've got a better 5 missions for a better Britain, by getting rid of 5 useless Labour shadow cabinet, Starmer, Rayner, Lammy, Dodds, and Nandy,
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 10:30:25 GMT
As Keir Starmer quite rightly stated .... better to have goals to aim for, than no aspirations at all, and they are noble aspirations based partly upon 13 years of TORY FAILURE.
To achieve high sustained growth ... NOT achieved ever in 13 years of Tory failure
Building an NHS fit for the future ... after 13 disasterous and destructive years under the Tories
Break down barriers to opportunity ... As against living standards falling for the first time in modern history
Make Britains streets safe ... ( Tories record in one sentence ) Firstly, get rid of 20,000 police officers, secondly, hire 20,000 police officers ... WTF is that all about. ?
Make Britain a clean energy superpower ... As aginst more Tory failure, less money to public transport, less buses, record profits for water companies who continue to pour raw sewage into our rivers.
For the first time in modern history, the people of Britain will be worse off when this government is booted, than what they were when they came to office in 2010.
Time for change - time to let someone else have a go
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 24, 2023 10:30:47 GMT
In depending on the Mail you reveal your intentions to fight, distort, insinuate or imply all the nonsense propaganda you can muster against Starmer and the Labour Party. So it would be useless to follow your posts in the hunt for objective information on either. Starmer's '5 missions for a Better Britain' now leaves him wide open to questions and expected answers. So stop complaining. I've got a better 5 missions for a better Britain, by getting rid of 5 useless Labour shadow cabinet, Starmer, Rayner, Lammy, Dodds, and Nandy, Well there are probably enough loonies on the right of politics to support your idea.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 10:40:34 GMT
The difference between the Shadow Cabinet and the government
The shadow cabinet have no record to compare to
The government have .... enough said
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 24, 2023 10:51:39 GMT
The difference between the Shadow Cabinet and the government The shadow cabinet have no record to compare to The government have .... enough said Plenty said but nothing of any consequence by Starmer . He is the new Ed Milliband.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 10:55:50 GMT
Except of course that Ed Miliband never really made any BIG breakthrough in the opinion polls ... unlike Mr Starmer.
Next Stop: The local elections in May, then watch the real panic set in amongst the Tories
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 24, 2023 11:01:23 GMT
Except of course that Ed Miliband never really made any BIG breakthrough in the opinion polls ... unlike Mr Starmer. Next Stop: The local elections in May, then watch the real panic set in amongst the Tories I never claimed that they had the same history. Starmer is as useless as Milliband . Labour is dependent on Tory failure. As you pointed out , the Labour opposition has nothing to gauge it by , only Starmers kneeling and Rayners sneering .
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 24, 2023 11:10:23 GMT
The difference between the Shadow Cabinet and the government The shadow cabinet have no record to compare to The government have .... enough said Even without that knowledge, when any one of them are interviewed the interview descends into the usual avoidance of the question ... they resort to their reset button ... the Tories do this, the tories do that, the tories the tories ... then they have to be reminded time and time, and over and over again by the interviewer 'we are asking you, it's not a party political broadcast', just answer the questions.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 24, 2023 11:14:27 GMT
Except of course that Ed Miliband never really made any BIG breakthrough in the opinion polls ... unlike Mr Starmer. Next Stop: The local elections in May, then watch the real panic set in amongst the Tories And starmers policies are what exactly? All he does is waffle.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 24, 2023 11:20:05 GMT
Except of course that Ed Miliband never really made any BIG breakthrough in the opinion polls ... unlike Mr Starmer. Next Stop: The local elections in May, then watch the real panic set in amongst the Tories And starmers policies are what exactly? All he does is waffle. Most of us are on to him.
We know when he's asked a direct question that he doesn't want to directly answer, we get the usual waffle, I must bash the Tories to divert from the question, he can not and will not answer a direct question, which makes him come across as no policy, weak leader.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 24, 2023 11:24:25 GMT
And starmers policies are what exactly? All he does is waffle. Most of us are on to him.
We know when he's asked a direct question that he doesn't want to directly answer, we get the usual waffle, I must bash the Tories to divert from the question, he can not and will not answer a direct question, which makes him come across as no policy, weak leader.
We know for a fact mate that every times his lips move he is bullshitting....Still it delights the lefties......LOL
|
|