|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 18, 2023 11:00:27 GMT
So someone else posted the stuff about two other MPs You missed the whole point of my post ie “Imo it’s not the fact that she grabbed a better AirPod than she needed , it’s the fact that she was too dumb to know it would come back and haunt her.”…and …..”Why not buy a cheaper set or charge the public for the price of a cheaper set and pay the balance herself ”……and went knee jerk whataboutery mode . Then you gave us your opinion about AirPods and pretended it was fact . Sane old boring Steve . Two other MPs choice is direct evidence of what the role needs. Do you really need that explained in simpler terms? It does nothing of the sort . It’s evidence of what they purchased……..Do you really need that explained in simpler terms? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 18, 2023 11:10:16 GMT
every time Rayner opens her mouth she puts her foot in it, and every time she opens her big fat gob Labour drop in the polls, so the moral of the story, Rayner should just shut the fuck up. Her supporters all seem to rely on shouting abuse instead of even attempting to understand why people dislike her. I can only conclude that she's a nasty foul mouthed and rather thick somebody, who shouldn't be in that position, surrounded by like-minded people. My guess is that some people support her because she conforms to Woke Socialist doctrine, which is probably all she has to offer. Well, that and the way she screams the word "scum" when discussing political rivals. Spot on. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 18, 2023 11:17:03 GMT
Rayner is the token working class oik at labours top table .
She is the new John Prescott.
I fully accept that both her and Prescott were very good union officials though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 19, 2023 0:47:34 GMT
Two other MPs choice is direct evidence of what the role needs. Do you really need that explained in simpler terms? It does nothing of the sort . It’s evidence of what they purchased……..Do you really need that explained in simpler terms? How bizarre of you to presume that other MPs had gear they did not need But then you feel that directly comparable examples are whataboutery and the assertion of some bloke on the internet is convincing evidence when you know full well it's more the other way round. Admit it you just hate Rayner and love winding up people. But fail spectacularly to put forward honest cogent arguments. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 19, 2023 2:02:15 GMT
It does nothing of the sort . It’s evidence of what they purchased……..Do you really need that explained in simpler terms? How bizarre of you to presume that other MPs had gear they did not need But then you feel that directly comparable examples are whataboutery and the assertion of some bloke on the internet is convincing evidence when you know full well it's more the other way round. Admit it you just hate Rayner and love winding up people. But fail spectacularly to put forward honest cogent arguments. I didn’t say that they didn’t need it Steve . It only happened between your ears . Happy trolling 😁 |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 19, 2023 2:05:58 GMT
Maybe you should have thought it out then before posting 'It does nothing of the sort' as a supposed rebuttal of 'direct evidence of what the role needs' if you didn't want it to look like you weren't suggesting they had gear they did not need.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 19, 2023 6:59:28 GMT
How bizarre of you to presume that other MPs had gear they did not need But then you feel that directly comparable examples are whataboutery and the assertion of some bloke on the internet is convincing evidence when you know full well it's more the other way round. Admit it you just hate Rayner and love winding up people. But fail spectacularly to put forward honest cogent arguments. I didn’t say that they didn’t need it Steve . It only happened between your ears . Happy trolling 😁 You have to admit tho mate these trolls do have a certain comedy value whith their delusions of grandeur and constant self-inflicted ignorance.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 19, 2023 11:00:29 GMT
Maybe you should have thought it out then before posting 'It does nothing of the sort' as a supposed rebuttal of 'direct evidence of what the role needs' if you didn't want it to look like you weren't suggesting they had gear they did not need. I don’t know what you are on about Steve and I suspect neither do you . |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 19, 2023 11:33:33 GMT
every time Rayner opens her mouth she puts her foot in it, and every time she opens her big fat gob Labour drop in the polls, so the moral of the story, Rayner should just shut the fuck up. Her supporters all seem to rely on shouting abuse instead of even attempting to understand why people dislike her. I can only conclude that she's a nasty foul mouthed and rather thick somebody, who shouldn't be in that position, surrounded by like-minded people. My guess is that some people support her because she conforms to Woke Socialist doctrine, which is probably all she has to offer. Well, that and the way she screams the word "scum" when discussing political rivals. People are entitled to dislike her but that is not an excuse for making all the insulting and usually false remarks against her that are regularly made on this thread. If people have an argument against what she has done then by all means make the point, don't indulge in a nasty unnecessary insulting campaign against her. Such a campaign might be OK for the woke Righties on the forum, but one does not need to be her supporter to understand that this sort of immature aggression is not acceptable. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 19, 2023 11:37:28 GMT
I didn’t say that they didn’t need it Steve . It only happened between your ears . Happy trolling 😁 You have to admit tho mate these trolls do have a certain comedy value whith their delusions of grandeur and constant self-inflicted ignorance.
As a master of trolling yourself, your post can be dismissed as, err, trolling |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 19, 2023 11:40:33 GMT
Her supporters all seem to rely on shouting abuse instead of even attempting to understand why people dislike her. I can only conclude that she's a nasty foul mouthed and rather thick somebody, who shouldn't be in that position, surrounded by like-minded people. My guess is that some people support her because she conforms to Woke Socialist doctrine, which is probably all she has to offer. Well, that and the way she screams the word "scum" when discussing political rivals. People are entitled to dislike her but that is not an excuse for making all the insulting and usually false remarks against her that are regularly made on this thread. If people have an argument against what she has done then by all means make the point, don't indulge in a nasty unnecessary insulting campaign against her. Such a campaign might be OK for the woke Righties on the forum, but one does not need to be her supporter to understand that this sort of immature aggression is not acceptable. Rayner ( according to the Guardian) quote…”We cannot get any worse than a bunch of scum, homophobic, racist, misogynistic, absolute vile … banana republic, vile, nasty, Etonian … piece of scum,” she said at the event, before adding that she had “held back a little”. What was that about “ nasty, unnecessary insulting “? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 19, 2023 11:59:42 GMT
People are entitled to dislike her but that is not an excuse for making all the insulting and usually false remarks against her that are regularly made on this thread. If people have an argument against what she has done then by all means make the point, don't indulge in a nasty unnecessary insulting campaign against her. Such a campaign might be OK for the woke Righties on the forum, but one does not need to be her supporter to understand that this sort of immature aggression is not acceptable. Rayner ( according to the Guardian) quote…”We cannot get any worse than a bunch of scum, homophobic, racist, misogynistic, absolute vile … banana republic, vile, nasty, Etonian … piece of scum,” she said at the event, before adding that she had “held back a little”. What was that about “ nasty, unnecessary insulting “ I've never heard her comment described as you have described it, do you, or does anyone else, have a verbatim copy of her comment in context and in inverted commas? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 19, 2023 12:03:04 GMT
Rayner ( according to the Guardian) quote…”We cannot get any worse than a bunch of scum, homophobic, racist, misogynistic, absolute vile … banana republic, vile, nasty, Etonian … piece of scum,” she said at the event, before adding that she had “held back a little”. What was that about “ nasty, unnecessary insulting “ I've never heard her comment described as you have described it, do you, or does anyone else, have a verbatim copy of her comment in context and in inverted commas? I copied and pasted it out of the Guardian . I’m confident that the Guardian would not publish a false quote tbh. www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/sep/26/angela-rayner-stands-by-remarks-calling-tories-scum?CMP=Share_iOSApp_OtherFrom another source . The Ashton-under-Lyne MP added that her attack was made in the “street language” of her northern working-class roots, saying it is a “phrase you use often in northern working-class towns”. inews.co.uk/news/politics/angela-rayner-what-say-comments-scum-tory-labour-party-conference-2021-row-explained-1220264 |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 19, 2023 12:08:00 GMT
yes and then shortly after that torrent of abuse she gave, David Amess got stabbed to death, and she had to go in hiding. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 19, 2023 12:13:05 GMT
yes and then shortly after that torrent of abuse she gave, David Amess got stabbed to death, and she had to go in hiding. Indeed. Then she apologised. |
|
