|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 18, 2023 9:30:11 GMT
The glaringly obvious thing there, the others aren't being double standard hypocrite's, you know ... people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones... and all that. Referring to different areas of suggested money overspend is not being hypocritical. every time Rayner opens her mouth she puts her foot in it, and every time she opens her big fat gob Labour drop in the polls, so the moral of the story, Rayner should just shut the fuck up.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 18, 2023 9:57:17 GMT
Referring to different areas of suggested money overspend is not being hypocritical. every time Rayner opens her mouth she puts her foot in it, and every time she opens her big fat gob Labour drop in the polls, so the moral of the story, Rayner should just shut the fuck up. The 'moral of the story is' ignore foul mouthed politically biased propaganda waged against her. The reason for the slanging match against her is, that insults, insinuations and put-downs are the main weapons used by the nastier side of right-wing politics. It is so much easier to do that than to objectively debate politics.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 18, 2023 10:17:15 GMT
Why not buy a cheaper set or..charge the public for the price of a cheaper set and pay the balance herself My cheap AirPods work fine on Zoom. A high end BMW or Mercedes would be perfect for the area sales manager but they have to put up with a series 3. Imo it’s not the fact that she grabbed a better AirPod than she needed , it’s the fact that she was too dumb to know it would come back and haunt her. And you know that not one single other MP used same? I very much doubt you can because guess what 'Meanwhile Tory MP for Southport Damien Moore spent £2,598 on Apple equipment in May, while Conservative MP for Redcar Jacob Young spent £1,940.'. When you're working on video calls in an office I'd say having noise filtering Airpods would significantly improve things. Whataboutery and missing the point . Rayner judges others but us too stupid too avoid being judged. Id say that she should be paid for the basic AirPod by public money and if she wants excellence then she should pay the difference.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 18, 2023 10:21:16 GMT
Nope but afaik the greedy Tory who blagged the duck house didn’t whine about greedy Labour MPs. He wouldn't dare since he claimed nearly £90,000 towards renovating his mansion on expenses and ended up resigning because of it. Indeed. If he publicly judged other MOs expenses then he would be judged himself. Something Rayner wasn’t bright enough to realise .
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 18, 2023 10:22:24 GMT
Whataboutery and missing the point . Rayner judges others but us too stupid too avoid being judged. Id say that she should be paid for the basic AirPod by public money and if she wants excellence then she should pay the difference. No whataboutery by me, had you actually read it you would have seen it was an evidenced demolition of your ridiculous ' she grabbed a better AirPod than she needed'
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 18, 2023 10:27:09 GMT
Whataboutery and missing the point . Rayner judges others but us too stupid too avoid being judged. Id say that she should be paid for the basic AirPod by public money and if she wants excellence then she should pay the difference. No whataboutery by me, had you actually read it you would have seen it was an evidenced demolition of your ridiculous ' she grabbed a better AirPod than she needed'I read it . It was whataboutery. Now you have been caught out using whataboutery , you are being argumentative. What next Steve? Semantics? Telling me what I actually meant? References to Spec savers What’s in your troll box today? You think because ‘ you’d say’ she needed then then it was fact…….ooh it was an ‘ EVIDENCED demolition’ . You are a funny man Stevie 😁
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 18, 2023 10:35:56 GMT
And you're just trying to drive discussion down to ad homs instead of debate because you know that the evidence of Tory MPs buying same gear shows she was likely right to buy the best performing audio and you are wrong A diagram for you to focus on, maybe you could try going up the scale
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 18, 2023 10:39:07 GMT
And you're just trying to drive discussion down to ad homs instead of debate because you know that the evidence of Tory MPs buying same gear shows she was likely right to buy the best performing audio and you are wrong A diagram for you to focus on, maybe you could try going up the scale Whereas you use whataboutery as a debate tool and pretend that your opinions are factual evidence . I repeat . You are a funny man Stevie .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2023 10:40:02 GMT
Referring to different areas of suggested money overspend is not being hypocritical. every time Rayner opens her mouth she puts her foot in it, and every time she opens her big fat gob Labour drop in the polls, so the moral of the story, Rayner should just shut the fuck up. Her supporters all seem to rely on shouting abuse instead of even attempting to understand why people dislike her. I can only conclude that she's a nasty foul mouthed and rather thick somebody, who shouldn't be in that position, surrounded by like-minded people. My guess is that some people support her because she conforms to Woke Socialist doctrine, which is probably all she has to offer. Well, that and the way she screams the word "scum" when discussing political rivals.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 18, 2023 10:41:00 GMT
And you're just trying to drive discussion down to ad homs instead of debate because you know that the evidence of Tory MPs buying same gear shows she was likely right to buy the best performing audio and you are wrong A diagram for you to focus on, maybe you could try going up the scale www.avforums.com/attachments/1676587511800-png.1827055 Whereas you use whataboutery as a debate tool and pretend that your opinions are factual evidence . I repeat . You are a funny man Stevie . But you know full well I didn't use whataboutery. Why you suggest direct evidence of others in similar roles use similar is whataboutery is either you being utterly stupid or dishonest (or both)
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 18, 2023 10:47:59 GMT
And you're just trying to drive discussion down to ad homs instead of debate because you know that the evidence of Tory MPs buying same gear shows she was likely right to buy the best performing audio and you are wrong A diagram for you to focus on, maybe you could try going up the scale Well done, Steve. You win "Most Ironic Post" of the day.
Yet again.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 18, 2023 10:51:06 GMT
So what was it, you missed all those facts I used to demolish your position or you're just in sad denial?
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 18, 2023 10:51:25 GMT
Whereas you use whataboutery as a debate tool and pretend that your opinions are factual evidence . I repeat . You are a funny man Stevie . But you know full well I didn't use whataboutery. Why you suggest direct evidence of others in similar roles use similar is whataboutery is either you being utterly stupid or dishonest (or both) So someone else posted the stuff about two other MPs ? You missed the whole point of my post ie “Imo it’s not the fact that she grabbed a better AirPod than she needed , it’s the fact that she was too dumb to know it would come back and haunt her.”…and …..”Why not buy a cheaper set or charge the public for the price of a cheaper set and pay the balance herself ”……and went knee jerk whataboutery mode . Then you gave us your opinion about AirPods and pretended it was fact . Sane old boring Steve .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 18, 2023 10:52:19 GMT
And you're just trying to drive discussion down to ad homs instead of debate because you know that the evidence of Tory MPs buying same gear shows she was likely right to buy the best performing audio and you are wrong A diagram for you to focus on, maybe you could try going up the scale Well done, Steve. You win "Most Ironic Post" of the day.
Yet again. There’s plenty more where that came from too😁
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 18, 2023 10:53:26 GMT
But you know full well I didn't use whataboutery. Why you suggest direct evidence of others in similar roles use similar is whataboutery is either you being utterly stupid or dishonest (or both) So someone else posted the stuff about two other MPs You missed the whole point of my post ie “Imo it’s not the fact that she grabbed a better AirPod than she needed , it’s the fact that she was too dumb to know it would come back and haunt her.”…and …..”Why not buy a cheaper set or charge the public for the price of a cheaper set and pay the balance herself ”……and went knee jerk whataboutery mode . Then you gave us your opinion about AirPods and pretended it was fact . Sane old boring Steve . Two other MPs choice is direct evidence of what the role needs. Do you really need that explained in simpler terms?
|
|