|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 13, 2023 22:27:40 GMT
you just display more of your ignorance with each post. How about the government backed advert talking about domestic abuse? Is that a waste of money or are heterosexual women worth the money? I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about as I dont watch broadcast TV. perhaps a link? The advert doesn't matter. The question does. Is a TV advert addressing domestic abuse a waste of government funds as it offers no monetary help to anyone but only highlights an issue. Similar to that of the rainbow crossings. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 13, 2023 22:28:52 GMT
Well, I'm convinced that the trans argument always results in the same lefties posting personal abuse, even when you reassure them that nobody is actually discriminating against their sexual preferences, desires or whatever you want to call it. Clearly they want greater division so they can virtue signal and police people, whilst causing trouble. , you were insinuating what their sexual preferences were. They can't, they have no idea. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 13, 2023 22:31:45 GMT
Its not correction, its acceptance. And yes why not. As i said, you feel you are using road markings to correct the attitudes of the population. It's doesn't matter that the correct attituded is called 'acceptance' The group you describe have two separate issues and one that isn't an issue at all. Being short used to mean they had to try harder to find a partner, but I think shortism is a dated issue most women ignore. Again - you are just using different words to say the same thing. We already know you have a crackpot social theory that deems some people worthy of attitude correcting road markings and others not. In fact, that's how i described (lampooned) your position when we started. Are you now suggesting that i have to accept your whole crackpot social theory for your road markings argument to make any sense at all? |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 13, 2023 22:35:32 GMT
I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about as I dont watch broadcast TV. perhaps a link? The advert doesn't matter. The question does. Is a TV advert addressing domestic abuse a waste of government funds as it offers no monetary help to anyone but only highlights an issue. Similar to that of the rainbow crossings. I have absolutely no idea if an advert I have never seen is a waste of money - I'm not sure why you would feel a need to ask that question in the first place. If you want to start discussing Government advertising then I did hear one on the radio that was a waste of money. They were advertising the 40 (yes four zero) schemes available to mitigate the cost of living crisis - a crisis created in large part by government energy policy.. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2023 22:37:40 GMT
you just display more of your ignorance with each post. How about the government backed advert talking about domestic abuse? Is that a waste of money or are heterosexual women worth the money? I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about as I dont watch broadcast TV. perhaps a link? It is odd how we have jumped to domestic abuse. Personally, I think more should be done against animal cruelty, but that's a different topic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Feb 13, 2023 22:50:04 GMT
Its not correction, its acceptance. And yes why not. As i said, you feel you are using road markings to correct the attitudes of the population. It's doesn't matter that the correct attituded is called 'acceptance' The group you describe have two separate issues and one that isn't an issue at all. Being short used to mean they had to try harder to find a partner, but I think shortism is a dated issue most women ignore. Again - you are just using different words to say the same thing. We already know you have a crackpot social theory that deems some people worthy of attitude correcting road markings and others not. In fact, that's how i described (lampooned) your position when we started. Are you now suggesting that i have to accept your whole crackpot social theory for your road markings argument to make any sense at all? Earlier I posted a newspaper article about the girl stabbed to death in Warrington. It seems the the gay brigade is upset because the death certificate will say she is male. Reality is she is indeed male who has fairly recently assumed girlhood. The world has gone mad. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 13, 2023 23:00:40 GMT
Its not correction, its acceptance. And yes why not. I said to promote conversation. But you tell me how can a rainbow crossing correct an attitude? The group you describe have two separate issues and one that isn't an issue at all. Being short used to mean they had to try harder to find a partner, but I think shortism is a dated issue most women ignore. Again - you are just using different words to say the same thing. We already know you have a crackpot social theory that deems some people worthy of attitude correcting road markings and others not. In fact, that's how i described (lampooned) your position when we started. Are you now suggesting that i have to accept your whole crackpot social theory for your road markings argument to make any sense at all? |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 13, 2023 23:04:12 GMT
The advert doesn't matter. The question does. Is a TV advert addressing domestic abuse a waste of government funds as it offers no monetary help to anyone but only highlights an issue. Similar to that of the rainbow crossings. I have absolutely no idea if an advert I have never seen is a waste of money - I'm not sure why you would feel a need to ask that question in the first place. If you want to start discussing Government advertising then I did hear one on the radio that was a waste of money. They were advertising the 40 (yes four zero) schemes available to mitigate the cost of living crisis - a crisis created in large part by government energy policy.. In principle is an advert paid for with tax payers money highlighting domestic abuse a waste of money. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2023 23:26:04 GMT
I have absolutely no idea if an advert I have never seen is a waste of money - I'm not sure why you would feel a need to ask that question in the first place. If you want to start discussing Government advertising then I did hear one on the radio that was a waste of money. They were advertising the 40 (yes four zero) schemes available to mitigate the cost of living crisis - a crisis created in large part by government energy policy.. In principle is an advert paid for with tax payers money highlighting domestic abuse a waste of money. It is if you're not in an abusive relationship. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 13, 2023 23:37:25 GMT
It's a complete waste of money. It's nagging.
|
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Feb 14, 2023 0:48:35 GMT
There are, no doubt, many common social attitudes you feel are unwarranted and unfair. Do you feel road marking are the proper venue for you to administer your correction to the population? Its not correction, its acceptance. And yes why not. The group you describe have two separate issues and one that isn't an issue at all. Being short used to mean they had to try harder to find a partner, but I think shortism is a dated issue most women ignore. Balding is pretty much in the same area. Though many men (Myself included) hate losing their hair I haven't heard of anyone losing a job or even a partner because of it As for liking big tits. Very many men like big tits, many women like big knobs. I have seen no discrimination whatsoever against these people have you? The employment tribunal doesn't agree that balding isn't an issue www.itv.com/news/calendar/2022-05-13/tribunal-rules-calling-colleagues-bald-is-sexual-harassmentThe three-person tribunal, led by Judge Jonathan Brain, was asked to rule whether calling someone bald is an insult or amounted to harassment.In their ruling, they compared using the term to commenting on a woman's breasts.The ruling said: "In our judgment, there is a connection between the word 'bald' on the one hand and the protected characteristic of sex on the other." |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 14, 2023 7:36:37 GMT
In principle is an advert paid for with tax payers money highlighting domestic abuse a waste of money. It is if you're not in an abusive relationship. And there you sum it up. Me! Me, Me first, Just Me. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 14, 2023 7:40:02 GMT
Its not correction, its acceptance. And yes why not. The group you describe have two separate issues and one that isn't an issue at all. Being short used to mean they had to try harder to find a partner, but I think shortism is a dated issue most women ignore. Balding is pretty much in the same area. Though many men (Myself included) hate losing their hair I haven't heard of anyone losing a job or even a partner because of it As for liking big tits. Very many men like big tits, many women like big knobs. I have seen no discrimination whatsoever against these people have you? The employment tribunal doesn't agree that balding isn't an issue www.itv.com/news/calendar/2022-05-13/tribunal-rules-calling-colleagues-bald-is-sexual-harassmentThe three-person tribunal, led by Judge Jonathan Brain, was asked to rule whether calling someone bald is an insult or amounted to harassment.In their ruling, they compared using the term to commenting on a woman's breasts.The ruling said: "In our judgment, there is a connection between the word 'bald' on the one hand and the protected characteristic of sex on the other."Excellent. I'm glad calling an employee a "bald cunt" is not considered acceptable. Of course it had to be shown it was meant as an insult which was borne out by the fact the guy was sacked. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2023 8:08:30 GMT
It is if you're not in an abusive relationship. And there you sum it up. Me! Me, Me first, Just Me. Your entire performance has all been about you. People disagreeing with you results with you attacking them on a personal level during this feeble attempt to come across as both morally and intellectually superior. I told you at the beginning that I see through it, and my only curiousity is to try and understand why some people actually behave this way, and why they hide behind a fake mask of self-righteousness whilst putting other people down. I guess it's a case of seeing the devil behind the mask and something for people to be aware of, because the intentions are bad and shouldn't ever be mistaken for altruism. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 14, 2023 8:23:49 GMT
I have absolutely no idea if an advert I have never seen is a waste of money - I'm not sure why you would feel a need to ask that question in the first place. If you want to start discussing Government advertising then I did hear one on the radio that was a waste of money. They were advertising the 40 (yes four zero) schemes available to mitigate the cost of living crisis - a crisis created in large part by government energy policy.. In principle is an advert paid for with tax payers money highlighting domestic abuse a waste of money. Without seeing the ad I would be reluctant to say either way. I do wonder why we need to advertise domestic abuse on the telly though - I would have thought that counselling or legal enforcement would have been more effective at stopping it. |
|
