|
Post by see2 on Feb 12, 2023 8:27:09 GMT
Stop insuring your house then. that will allow you to keep more of our own money and benefit. Everybody makes different decisions about the level of insurance they want on their property - for some a low level of cover is indeed a benefit as it allows them more money to spend on other things. I'm surprised that I have to explain insurance to you. I'm not surprised that you have completely missed the point.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 12, 2023 8:30:39 GMT
Everybody makes different decisions about the level of insurance they want on their property - for some a low level of cover is indeed a benefit as it allows them more money to spend on other things. I'm surprised that I have to explain insurance to you. I'm not surprised that you have completely missed the point. You have a point? - theres a first..
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 12, 2023 8:38:59 GMT
This should have happened years ago, they should do 3 days a week community service 2 days job hunting or lose benefits. It should be a leg up on benefits for 6 months then if they dont take one of 3 job offers they lose benefits for good. Jobless will have to learn work skills or have their benefits cut in new 'carrot and stick' crackdown on unemployment Four areas of the country are already piloting the two-week scheme Non-attendance will result in claimants losing universal credit for up to 3 months Read more: Benefits system blamed for 'marriage gap' between rich and poor www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11739591/Jobless-learn-work-sills-benefits-cut-crackdown-unemployment.html
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 12, 2023 8:52:25 GMT
Stop insuring your house then. that will allow you to keep more of our own money and benefit. Everybody makes different decisions about the level of insurance they want on their property - for some a low level of cover is indeed a benefit as it allows them more money to spend on other things. I'm surprised that I have to explain insurance to you. But you weren't arguing here on having a choice of what NHS services etc you have. You were arguing that spending cuts had no cost. So my analogy is that 'spending cuts' in your insurance does have a 'cost' Just as spending cuts in your 'tax' does have a 'cost'
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 12, 2023 8:55:37 GMT
I'm not surprised that you have completely missed the point. You have a point? - theres a first.. Yes a very good one. Just because you missed it, doesn't mean it wasn't there. It just passed you by while you weren't looking for it.
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Feb 12, 2023 8:57:20 GMT
To spend quite a lot on waste. Certainly in the eyes of many, but a government with no income can't do any of the positive things that need to be done. Taxes were initially imposed to finance war, not LGBT pedestrian crossings.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 12, 2023 8:59:47 GMT
This should have happened years ago, they should do 3 days a week community service 2 days job hunting or lose benefits. It should be a leg up on benefits for 6 months then if they dont take one of 3 job offers they lose benefits for good. Jobless will have to learn work skills or have their benefits cut in new 'carrot and stick' crackdown on unemployment Four areas of the country are already piloting the two-week scheme Non-attendance will result in claimants losing universal credit for up to 3 months Read more: Benefits system blamed for 'marriage gap' between rich and poor www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11739591/Jobless-learn-work-sills-benefits-cut-crackdown-unemployment.htmlI always thought that the unemployed should contribute to their community. But unemployment in the UK is very small compared to historical numbers. The big problem now is lack of quality jobs. The say 'quality jobs' to define them from low paid jobs. The implication of the words 'low paid' is that the simple solution is to pay them more.
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Feb 12, 2023 9:00:21 GMT
Bank base rates rose after Labour won in 97. Bank rates continued to rise for a very short period under NL in 97, before falling well below the many years under Tory administration. Brown also raided pension funds, another disater for those who had tried to provide for their future.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 12, 2023 9:02:45 GMT
Certainly in the eyes of many, but a government with no income can't do any of the positive things that need to be done. Taxes were initially imposed to finance war, not LGBT pedestrian crossings. Ah those good old days. I think everyone thinks that tax to back the land grab of the rich is far better than a gesture towards LGBT. Sigh.
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Feb 12, 2023 9:04:46 GMT
Everybody makes different decisions about the level of insurance they want on their property - for some a low level of cover is indeed a benefit as it allows them more money to spend on other things. I'm surprised that I have to explain insurance to you. I'm not surprised that you have completely missed the point. Not if you consider that cardboard cartons are cheaper to replace than orange boxes.
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Feb 12, 2023 9:06:56 GMT
Taxes were initially imposed to finance war, not LGBT pedestrian crossings. Ah those good old days. I think everyone thinks that tax to back the land grab of the rich is far better than a gesture towards LGBT. Sigh. Yeah but no one's interested in your cranky ideas other than as humour.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Feb 12, 2023 9:07:27 GMT
I'm not surprised that you have completely missed the point. You have a point? - theres a first.. To control what you think and say, so we pointed it out for you.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 12, 2023 9:07:29 GMT
I'm not surprised that you have completely missed the point. Not if you consider that cardboard cartons are cheaper to replace than orange boxes. Please don't trash the thread with your endless banalities.
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Feb 12, 2023 9:50:37 GMT
Not if you consider that cardboard cartons are cheaper to replace than orange boxes. Please don't trash the thread with your endless banalities. You are the master.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 12, 2023 11:28:08 GMT
Everybody makes different decisions about the level of insurance they want on their property - for some a low level of cover is indeed a benefit as it allows them more money to spend on other things. I'm surprised that I have to explain insurance to you. But you weren't arguing here on having a choice of what NHS services etc you have. You were arguing that spending cuts had no cost.
So my analogy is that 'spending cuts' in your insurance does have a 'cost' Just as spending cuts in your 'tax' does have a 'cost' What 'cost' would there be if spending cuts resulted in no more rainbows painted on the roads, police cars or fire engines?
|
|