|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 3, 2023 8:34:03 GMT
Was that what the report said? It's available above for you to read. The report is a bloody conflict of interests...Now maybe you could answer my question. How is telling a load of lazy pig ignorant arseholes to get back to work a form of bullying? When it comes to whinging you and a few others make Remainers look like boy scouts. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 3, 2023 8:36:47 GMT
Well as I said earlier - Johnson deserved to get fined for bringing in such damn silly Laws. But I am amused by those, like you, who try and pretend that Curry and Beer is in a different league to Cake and Wine - how very working class of you..  It was the situations that were the telling factors. Hmm.. so both were in a place of work and both consisted of only work colleagues attending. The only different situation is that one was in the North and one was in the South.. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 3, 2023 9:00:58 GMT
It was the situations that were the telling factors. Hmm.. so both were in a place of work and both consisted of only work colleagues attending. The only different situation is that one was in the North and one was in the South.. In your opinion that is, as far as I can tell, those with the power the responsibility and the authority to investigate see it differently to yourself. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 3, 2023 10:13:00 GMT
Who do you think should have investigated? If you 'alleged' you got the shit kicked out of you by the police would you want the police investigating your complaint?
of course not.
The same thing applies when a Civil Servant is the head of a inquiry that is looking in to allegations of bullying on behalf of Civil Servants, it's called a conflict of interest.
It is safe to assume he was always going to uphold in favour of the Civil Servants complaints, and that is why you can't see past your nose, I am stating the bleeding obvious.
Head of the alleged bullying inquiry Priti Patel
"Sir Alexander Claud Stuart Allan" KCB (born 9 February 1951) is a British civil servant who served as chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee and Head of Intelligence Assessment for Her Majesty's Government between 2007 and 2011.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 3, 2023 10:32:22 GMT
You certainly have . You live it 😆 You can see that when you have nothing positive to post ^^^ you return to your argumentative self. Projection from the one who said he didn’t want to argue ^ |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 3, 2023 10:43:25 GMT
Will do boss....Poor lickle snowflakes... I don't mind his tantrums. As a parent I got quite used to seeing the children stamp their feet while crying with rage when they couldn't get their own way. It would be more fun if he had more imagination but he's never going to be able to prove, never mind justify, his claims about Starmer so I can see why he's frustrated. I'll give him a pat on the head for being a good boy and eating his din din instead of a verbal kick up the arse next time.  No tantrums from me lefty…..Amazement yes but no tantrums. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Feb 3, 2023 11:21:43 GMT
Who do you think should have investigated? If you 'alleged' you got the shit kicked out of you by the police would you want the police investigating your complaint?
of course not.
The same thing applies when a Civil Servant is the head of a inquiry that is looking in to allegations of bullying on behalf of Civil Servants, it's called a conflict of interest.
It is safe to assume he was always going to uphold in favour of the Civil Servants complaints, and that is why you can't see past your nose, I am stating the bleeding obvious.
Head of the alleged bullying inquiry Priti Patel
"Sir Alexander Claud Stuart Allan" KCB (born 9 February 1951) is a British civil servant who served as chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee and Head of Intelligence Assessment for Her Majesty's Government between 2007 and 2011.
Thanks for the reply, but you answered the question "who do you think should not investigate" rather than the question that I asked, which was "who do you think SHOULD investigate". |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 3, 2023 11:22:13 GMT
Any one else think it iffy that it just so happens those Civil Servants who accused Priti Patel and now Raab of bullying just coincidentally happen to be from the remain camp, hell hath no fury like remainer scorned ..... waits for the usual suspects who wont get the obvious connection LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 3, 2023 11:26:22 GMT
If you 'alleged' you got the shit kicked out of you by the police would you want the police investigating your complaint?
of course not.
The same thing applies when a Civil Servant is the head of a inquiry that is looking in to allegations of bullying on behalf of Civil Servants, it's called a conflict of interest.
It is safe to assume he was always going to uphold in favour of the Civil Servants complaints, and that is why you can't see past your nose, I am stating the bleeding obvious.
Head of the alleged bullying inquiry Priti Patel
"Sir Alexander Claud Stuart Allan" KCB (born 9 February 1951) is a British civil servant who served as chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee and Head of Intelligence Assessment for Her Majesty's Government between 2007 and 2011.
Thanks for the reply, but you answered the question "who do you think should not investigate" rather than the question that I asked, which was "who do you think SHOULD investigate". Well if I have to state the obvious, any one who is not connect to the Civil Service, it was utter stupidity putting a Civil Servant in charge of a inquiry on behalf of Civil Servants, lunacy, it's nothing short of a kangaroo court.
It should have been a independent 'outside' inquiry, by people who clearly would have no conflict of interest, I take it you agree you would not want a complaint against the police investigating by the police ... or would you? I for one would instantly think 'cover up' from the get-go.
No different than Civil Servants investigating Civil Servants, flawed from the start.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 3, 2023 11:27:59 GMT
If you 'alleged' you got the shit kicked out of you by the police would you want the police investigating your complaint?
of course not.
The same thing applies when a Civil Servant is the head of a inquiry that is looking in to allegations of bullying on behalf of Civil Servants, it's called a conflict of interest.
It is safe to assume he was always going to uphold in favour of the Civil Servants complaints, and that is why you can't see past your nose, I am stating the bleeding obvious.
Head of the alleged bullying inquiry Priti Patel
"Sir Alexander Claud Stuart Allan" KCB (born 9 February 1951) is a British civil servant who served as chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee and Head of Intelligence Assessment for Her Majesty's Government between 2007 and 2011.
Thanks for the reply, but you answered the question "who do you think should not investigate" rather than the question that I asked, which was "who do you think SHOULD investigate". Thats easy.. Kelvin Mackenzie Nick Ferrari Jeremy Clarkson.. But of course it was just jobs for the boys.. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Feb 3, 2023 11:32:08 GMT
Any one else think it iffy that it just so happens those Civil Servants who accused Priti Patel and now Raab of bullying just coincidentally happen to be from the remain camp, hell hath no fury like remainer scorned ..... waits for the usual suspects who wont get the obvious connection LOL You know that the CS who have accused Raab are NOT the same as the ones who also accused Patel? 😳 |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 3, 2023 11:41:54 GMT
Any one else think it iffy that it just so happens those Civil Servants who accused Priti Patel and now Raab of bullying just coincidentally happen to be from the remain camp, hell hath no fury like remainer scorned ..... waits for the usual suspects who wont get the obvious connection LOL You know that the CS who have accused Raab are NOT the same as the ones who also accused Patel? 😳 'Civil Servants' regardless, the same civil servants who are all 'united' and on strike, they 'stick together', if you can't tell the difference between genuine complaints and 'stitch ups' then I have to feel for you, it's people like you who we read about, who sends thousands of pounds to a online Taylor Swift lookalike, only to find out once your bank account is emptied, that it was in fact a 6ft 7 black Nigerian sitting behind a computer. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Feb 3, 2023 13:42:38 GMT
'Civil Servants' regardless, the same civil servants who are all 'united' and on strike, they 'stick together', There are over 500,000 civil servants. About 100,000 went on strike. I'm not responding to the rest of your post as I'm not sure if it's personal abuse or just delusion? 🤷 |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 3, 2023 13:47:18 GMT
'Civil Servants' regardless, the same civil servants who are all 'united' and on strike, they 'stick together', There are over 500,000 civil servants. About 100,000 went on strike. I'm not responding to the rest of your post as I'm not sure if it's personal abuse or just delusion? 🤷 'personal abuse'? have you lost your mind? |
|
|
|
Post by Morgan on Feb 3, 2023 14:13:20 GMT
I don't mind his tantrums. As a parent I got quite used to seeing the children stamp their feet while crying with rage when they couldn't get their own way. It would be more fun if he had more imagination but he's never going to be able to prove, never mind justify, his claims about Starmer so I can see why he's frustrated. I'll give him a pat on the head for being a good boy and eating his din din instead of a verbal kick up the arse next time. No tantrums from me lefty…..Amazement yes but no tantrums. Of course you're amazed. It's impossible for you to produce one single piece of credible evidence that proves Starmer was guilty of any wrong doing as far as Beergate is concerned. You're just ranting and libelling people because they disagree with you. So I'll just leave you to fume at your own ignorance and embarrassment for now.  |
|
