Brexit is Doomed

The call for independence would be just as loud and just as often if the UK were still in the EU.
The EU is a side issue and a focal point to whine about .
Scotland took part in a pan UK referendum. Everyone knew this including the Scots. 
The Scot Indy narrative is what I said it is ..they dont want to share the wealth they claim to have with England .
The EU whine is just reframing the real narrative into a package that the SNP think they can sell to voters. It’s not a concrete argument at all.

Yes it’s given a sub narrative the position of main narrative . The question of the problems involved in both leaving they union and joining the EU are brushed aside . The sub  narrative is that the sassenachs are oppressing the Scots and stymieing their blue sky future .
Much the same as the ex remainers claim that Johnson and other brexiters accused the EU.
The point is that the true Scot Indy narrative just isn’t that ..it’s the narrative that I  posted. Keeping England from the pot of gold that the SNP claims is there for the taking 
THATS the point .

That's the point you are trying to make.  Unfortunately, it is very much irrelevant to the point that Brexit has given substance to the Scot Indy narrative.

Whatever your chosen narrative may be is irrelevant because every narrative is subsumed and substantiated by the fact that Scotland voted to remain in the EU and the only way for Scotland to achieve that is to gain independence from the rest of the UK.  The narratives you have presented are no longer flimsy or doubtful or debatable.  They now have a very compelling argument in that:

"The will of the people of Scotland is to remain in the European Union.  In order to fulfill that will of the people, Scotland will have to be or must be independent from the United Kingdom."  

How can you go against the will of the people of Scotland when you used the will of the people of England and Wales to force the Scots to leave the European Union?  That is now the argument with which you have to contend.  And that is what I mean by arguing that Brexit has given Scottish arguments a leg to stand on.

It hadn’t given it substance . It’s given a platform for a sub narrative to be used as the main narrative .
The Brexit vote didn’t go against the will of the Scottish people . It was a UK wide vote .
How many times must the remainers need to be told this ?

Whatever it is -- platform or substance -- Brexit has bolstered Scotland's argument for independence.  Whether or not it was a UK-wide vote is irrelevant to Scotland.  They voted to remain in the EU but can't do so because England and Wales voted to leave; therefore?  They must leave the United Kingdom.  Forget economics, forget history; wishing to be in the EU and being prevent from doing so is the only argument they are presenting at the moment.

I'm sorry, but Scotland is still a nation that has supposedly equal say in the union.  And if the rest of the union can't respect the will of the Scottish people then you have to let them leave the union.  

It’s bolstered nothing .
It has merely provided another platform for claiming to be oppressed.
They voted in a UK referendum . 
You forget whatever you want but don’t insist others forget that the EU narrative is a  side show to the main narrative of keeping their perceived future wealth from the English .
I understand that some disgruntled remainers might wish otherwise or pretend otherwise to bolster their own bitterness at Brexit but the reality is that Brexit is being used by the SNP to make the false claim of being oppressed.