|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 11, 2023 20:56:07 GMT
Who’s shutting who up?  coronavirus-yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/All suspected adverse effects from Covid vaccines (and all medications) are reported here. And the news media has covered some of them. The problem for all those who revel in posting misinformation, and think it fun, all the benefits of vaccination seem to unbiased reviewers, to substantially outweigh drawbacks… Look who funds MHRA LOL
Enough said..
The MHRA is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care for the regulation of medical devices, whilst the costs of medicines regulation is met through fees from the pharmaceutical industry.[ This has led to suggestions by some MPs that the MHRA is too reliant on industry, and so not fully independent.
In 2017, the MHRA was awarded over £980,000 by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to fund its work with the foundation and the World Health Organization on improving safety monitoring for new medicines in low and middle-income countries.
In response to a Freedom of Information request, in 2022 the MHRA stated that approximately £3 million had been received from the Gates Foundation for a number of initiatives spanning several financial years.
LOL
Allthese bloody bodies that are set up are made up of those who have an axe to grind mate. It may be set up with good intentions but that soon becomes undermined. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 11, 2023 20:58:31 GMT
Look I don't know what the evidence is, because it's suppressed from the public.
But ..
"Worldwide, cases of inflammation of the heart (called myocarditis or pericarditis) have been reported very rarely after COVID-19 vaccines. Most of these cases have been in younger men and usually a few days after the vaccination. Most of these people recovered and felt better following rest and simple treatments"
But..
Why can't we have a grown up debate about it?
Every time any one dares question side effects of Covid vaccine they are SHUT UP.
It makes people very suspicious that we can't have a honest open debate about, you are instantly classed as a 'nutter' or a 'vaccine denier'.
Why not let people make their own minds up, if there is nothing to hide let people express their fears and negative effects after the vaccine, people can then decide working on the pros and cons if they want it, we almost went down the route of compulsory vaccines... which would have been a disaster.
The NHS keep chasing me to have a flu vaccine I had one about 4 years ago and my nose hasn't stopped running since that was fucking handy during the pandemic.... Now they are chasing me to have a frigging Pneumonia vaccine. As far as I am concerned they can shove their vaccines where the sun don't shine. Sometimes these vaccines are worse than the ailment they are supposedly guarding you from. Bloody hell during the pandemic some were saying that those who refused to have the vaccine should be penalised or even locked up FFS as tho they were lepers. Funny tho those who made the most noise over anti vaxers were the very same ones who support the dross we are now forced to take in along with all their germs and ailmets that come with them. Well I was a fuckin idiot, I went along with the sheep ...baa baa baa
Browbeaten in to having the Covid jab, I am triple vaccinated and never felt as fucked.
My own fault can't blame no one else.
If they put another Covid vaccine near me I'll fuckin pulverize them.
I've probably fucked up my whole immune system, and I can't reverse it.
I've never had so many sore throats, running noses, blocked up noses, headaches, dizzy spells since I had the fuckin jab.
I've been well and truly Conned.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 11, 2023 21:12:17 GMT
Look who funds MHRA LOL
Enough said..
The MHRA is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care for the regulation of medical devices, whilst the costs of medicines regulation is met through fees from the pharmaceutical industry.[ This has led to suggestions by some MPs that the MHRA is too reliant on industry, and so not fully independent.
In 2017, the MHRA was awarded over £980,000 by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to fund its work with the foundation and the World Health Organization on improving safety monitoring for new medicines in low and middle-income countries.
In response to a Freedom of Information request, in 2022 the MHRA stated that approximately £3 million had been received from the Gates Foundation for a number of initiatives spanning several financial years.
LOL
Allthese bloody bodies that are set up are made up of those who have an axe to grind mate. It may be set up with good intentions but that soon becomes undermined. Exactly
The Regulators, guess who funds them
Ofgem, Ofcom, Owat
They are funded ^^ by the people they 'allegedly' regulate, who the fuck bites the hand that feeds them.
The regulators should be totally independent from who they regulate, or we will just rightly say ...it's a conflict of interest.
That's why the energy customer has been well and truly fucked over by the energy companies and the regulators who aren't regulating them.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 11, 2023 21:23:01 GMT
Allthese bloody bodies that are set up are made up of those who have an axe to grind mate. It may be set up with good intentions but that soon becomes undermined. Exactly
The Regulators, guess who funds them
Ofgem, Ofcom, Owat
They are funded ^^ by the people they 'allegedly' regulate, who the fuck bites the hand that feeds them.
The regulators should be totally independent from who they regulate, or we will just rightly say ...it's a conflict of interest.
That's why the energy customer has been well and truly fucked over by the energy companies and the regulators who aren't regulating them.
Even blacklives matter that was started by two coloured women with honourable intentions in Neworleans after that terrible tornado wrecked 80% of that city along with 60% of Louisiana was taken over by those who had an axe to grind and pricks like stammer fell for it hook line and sinker. Louisiana or whats left of if is still being devastated now by tornados and have not been rebuilt since the last one. So were are the blacklives matter now? Bitching about some poor sod like sir francis drake or a frgging street that has black in its name etc |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 11, 2023 21:34:14 GMT
Exactly
The Regulators, guess who funds them
Ofgem, Ofcom, Owat
They are funded ^^ by the people they 'allegedly' regulate, who the fuck bites the hand that feeds them.
The regulators should be totally independent from who they regulate, or we will just rightly say ...it's a conflict of interest.
That's why the energy customer has been well and truly fucked over by the energy companies and the regulators who aren't regulating them.
Even blacklives matter that was started by two coloured women with honourable intentions in Neworleans after that terrible tornado wrecked 80% of that city along with 60% of Louisiana was taken over by those who had an axe to grind and pricks like stammer fell for it hook line and sinker. Louisiana or whats left of if is still being devastated now by tornados and have not been rebuilt since the last one. So were are the blacklives matter now? Bitching about some poor sod like sir francis drake or a frgging street that has black in its name etc It's a shame really because genuine caring people start off with good intentions, once they see how much money is rolling in they are either taken over by the greedy people, or they become greedy themselves.
BLM were taking in so much money they completely lost control of what they were set up for.
It became a money making racket, that many of the organizers are now facing fraud charges
This is what happens when there is no governing body overseeing these so called organizations.
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Jan 11, 2023 21:40:22 GMT
And what’s all that to do with an attention-seeking politician, whose IQ appears to be less than his collar size (even in metric) so that he’s easily influenced by any cause that’ll get him air time or money…?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 11, 2023 21:43:38 GMT
And what’s all that to do with an attention-seeking politician, whose IQ appears to be less than his collar size (even in metric) so that he’s easily influenced by any cause that’ll get him air time or money…? yeah well you very rarely post beyond the age of your sock size, so you should know. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jan 11, 2023 21:51:55 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Jan 11, 2023 22:02:00 GMT
I rest my case. The guy’s a nut, attention seeker, or (judging by his past record) being paid to peddle info… |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2023 22:02:54 GMT
So 59 people killed by the vaccine according to the BBC "fact check". 59 people who would be alive today. Collateral damage as they were told they were doing it for the greater good, which they probably did. People have to make their own risk benefit assessment and act accordingly. All the information is out there, including the reduced risk as the latest variants are far less dangerous than the original Wuhan strain. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 11, 2023 22:18:59 GMT
It was. But why should the victims be penalised because they didn’t know better than to accept the guidance of the emergency services…? Who is penalising the victims?. They followed the wrong advice - it happens to many people across the globe every day. Or are you suggesting we shouldn't point out when people make the wrong decisions? |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Jan 11, 2023 22:28:34 GMT
It was. But why should the victims be penalised because they didn’t know better than to accept the guidance of the emergency services…? Who is penalising the victims?. They followed the wrong advice - it happens to many people across the globe every day. Or are you suggesting we shouldn't point out when people make the wrong decisions? I’m pointing out that supporting a moronic statement by Rees-Mogg that the victims who followed the LBF’s flawed advice should have known better was at best mistaken and at worst, toadying of the most crass type. But I suspect you knew that… |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 11, 2023 22:30:49 GMT
Who is penalising the victims?. They followed the wrong advice - it happens to many people across the globe every day. Or are you suggesting we shouldn't point out when people make the wrong decisions? I’m pointing out that supporting a moronic statement by Rees-Mogg that the victims who followed the LBF’s flawed advice should have known better was at best mistaken and at worst, toadying of the most crass type. But I suspect you knew that… Are you really trying to tell me that you would stay in a burning highrise if someone told you to? |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jan 11, 2023 22:32:53 GMT
In the event of a fire, it's not unreasonable to follow the advice of the fire brigade. They are the ones trained and experienced in fire and rescue.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 11, 2023 22:38:51 GMT
In the event of a fire, it's not unreasonable to follow the advice of the fire brigade. They are the ones trained and experienced in fire and rescue. Would you stay put in a burning highrise? |
|
