|
|
Post by happyjack on Jan 12, 2023 1:35:45 GMT
Great to see that the quality of your debating skills are just as impressive as ever, Morayloon. They are almost as sharp as your ability to read, process and understand that I felt compelled to compliment you on recently.
Having said that, I think that I might have spotted a little chink in your reasoning. Do you really think that Englishmen who hate Scots are Unionists? Surely even you can see that that logic is a tad flawed?
Perhaps, if they are Unionists, it is more likely that they have issues with certain Scots only eg. those amongst us who want to break up the Union, and who are disrespectful about the UK, England and the English.
Alternatively, if there really are some on here who genuinely hate all Scots, isn’t it more likely that these people are English Supremacists or the like. I have to say that I see no evidence of hatred for Scots on here. In my view, the worst example on here of that type of behaviour flows the other way, but even then I wouldn’t say that that person hates the English; he just has issues.
As for me, if you truly believe that I am a rabid Unionist, then maybe you should get yourself down to my part of Scotland and spout some of your twisted views. I am sure if you do then you will soon find out what a rabid Unionist really looks like.
BTW - your memory is failing you a little. I have never claimed to be sitting on the fence on independence. When I joined, I explained to the forum that I was a No voter who voted that way mainly because I felt that independence would be far too financially damaging and risky. That’s where I was then and, although better informed, that’s pretty much still where I am now, except that I am now more confident that there is no good financial case for leaving the UK - so I feel more rooted in the No side than I was back then. Well, that plus I really don’t want to be on the same side of the divide as any of the Indy zealots on here, obviously.
PS - If the chat about renewables is genuine and not more SNP hype then that could be a game changer in terms of financial viability -and therefore in how I would vote in a referendum. For now I watch and wait to see how things unfold.
|
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Jan 12, 2023 11:14:41 GMT
Great to see that the quality of your debating skills are just as impressive as ever, Morayloon. They are almost as sharp as your ability to read, process and understand that I felt compelled to compliment you on recently. Having said that, I think that I might have spotted a little chink in your reasoning. Do you really think that Englishmen who hate Scots are Unionists? Surely even you can see that that logic is a tad flawed? Perhaps, if they are Unionists, it is more likely that they have issues with certain Scots only eg. those amongst us who want to break up the Union, and who are disrespectful about the UK, England and the English. Alternatively, if there really are some on here who genuinely hate all Scots, isn’t it more likely that these people are English Supremacists or the like. I have to say that I see no evidence of hatred for Scots on here. In my view, the worst example on here of that type of behaviour flows the other way, but even then I wouldn’t say that that person hates the English; he just has issues. As for me, if you truly believe that I am a rabid Unionist, then maybe you should get yourself down to my part of Scotland and spout some of your twisted views. I am sure if you do then you will soon find out what a rabid Unionist really looks like. BTW - your memory is failing you a little. I have never claimed to be sitting on the fence on independence. When I joined, I explained to the forum that I was a No voter who voted that way mainly because I felt that independence would be far too financially damaging and risky. That’s where I was then and, although better informed, that’s pretty much still where I am now, except that I am now more confident that there is no good financial case for leaving the UK - so I feel more rooted in the No side than I was back then. Well, that plus I really don’t want to be on the same side of the divide as any of the Indy zealots on here, obviously. PS - If the chat about renewables is genuine and not more SNP hype then that could be a game changer in terms of financial viability -and therefore in how I would vote in a referendum. For now I watch and wait to see how things unfold. Can you tell me who this apology is aimed at. Or is it a secret. In terms of renewable. What has it to do with the SNP about cost. It is 3.7 pence per KW per hour for renewable and just under 50 pence for Nuclear and fossil to produce. When Hinkley point come on line, years late and billions over budget, and on the NG. It is expected that the 50 pence will rise to £1 per KW hour. Now if you are totally incapable of doing research on that.. Such as your drivel on GERs, as you read the word deficit next to the word Scotland and that was it. Head up rectum. Do not expect others to do the research for you. I stated the SNP plan a singular system for Scotland at 3.7 per KW hour and system for the NG at around 50 pence per KW hour. I did not need risk assessment or feel the need to consult a financial wizard to understand the implications. Which is really not rocket science. You have still not explained this risk assessment as you sit and wait to see how things are going. What do you not see with England and lets not call it anything else with a £2,8 trillion debt. Yes that really is £2,800,000,000,000. Rising at over £5,000 per second. With a up and coming energy crises at around £600 billion. Plus a never ending decommissioning cost around a billion a year.. You put your price on it. A English QE problem of some £800 billion that will have to be paid back by your grandkids grandkids, grandkids. And a Englsih external dent of some $8 trillion USD. Or was your risk assessment still stuck in your brain about a £70 million ferry cock up. So what are you waiting to see. A fairy sitting on top of a unicorn disappearing over the horizon into the sunny uplands. What was that about twisted views. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Jan 12, 2023 14:06:22 GMT
I have no idea what you are talking about or why, but there was absolutely zero apology in my post.
Even by your bizarre and unfathomable standards, this latest offering is genuine nonsense from you from start to finish.
|
|
|
|
Post by morayloon on Jan 13, 2023 2:42:50 GMT
As for me, if you truly believe that I am a rabid Unionist, then maybe you should get yourself down to my part of Scotland and spout some of your twisted views. I am sure if you do then you will soon find out what a rabid Unionist really looks like. BTW - your memory is failing you a little. I have never claimed to be sitting on the fence on independence. When I joined, I explained to the forum that I was a No voter who voted that way mainly because I felt that independence would be far too financially damaging and risky. That’s where I was then and, although better informed, that’s pretty much still where I am now, except that I am now more confident that there is no good financial case for leaving the UK - so I feel more rooted in the No side than I was back then. Well, that plus I really don’t want to be on the same side of the divide as any of the Indy zealots on here, obviously. Believe me, I truly believe you are a rabid ultra unionist. The sad thing is that there are loads more like you. People who talk Scotland down at the slightest opportunity. People who believe "their" country is better governed by a Parliament in a foreign country. I posted in another thread about your fence sitting activities. You did not need to make that NO statement though. We were all fully aware of your ultra unionist tendencies. Your laughable attempts at fence sitting were lamentable, did you really think people would take you seriously? |
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Jan 13, 2023 9:16:39 GMT
I have no idea what you are talking about or why, but there was absolutely zero apology in my post. Even by your bizarre and unfathomable standards, this latest offering is genuine nonsense from you from start to finish. Yes I know you do not know what I am talking about. I concluded that way back in the old forum. As your post is directed at nobody. So if it is at me. In my bizzare genuine nonsense which I see once again you refuse to correct. Here is the last bit. See copy and paste below. Could you correct the bizarre nonsense. And answer the question. Have you worked out the two tier energy system yet. One costing 3.7p per KW hour and the other around 50p per KW hour. Or is that bizzare nonsense as well. The ones ranting bizzare nonsense matey is you and the clowns who like your clueless rant. What is your risk assessment waiting to see. So instead of ranting drivel it is wrong. If it is wrong you must know the correct figures. So correct it. What is rocket science in that. This is a copy and paste. It is complete with figures that are not my figures. They come from the ONS, HMRC, UK Treasury, and so on. and it has not changed in the last 24 hours.Well apart from the English debt interest whoich has risen by £432,000,000 in the last 24 hours. . That would buy 4 ferry's. That is the scale your risk assessment is not seeing. And what you call a cock up.. Big time. Stick to fairy's and unicorns You have still not explained this risk assessment as you sit and wait to see how things are going. What do you not see with England and lets not call it anything else with a £2,8 trillion debt. Yes that really is £2,800,000,000,000. Rising at over £5,000 per second. With a up and coming energy crises at around £600 billion. Plus a never ending decommissioning cost around a billion a year.. You put your price on it. A English QE problem of some £800 billion that will have to be paid back by your grandkids grandkids, grandkids. And a Englsih external dent of some $8 trillion USD. Or was your risk assessment still stuck in your brain about a £70 million ferry cock up. So what are you waiting to see. A fairy sitting on top of a unicorn disappearing over the horizon into the sunny uplands. What was that about twisted views. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Jan 13, 2023 12:38:31 GMT
As for me, if you truly believe that I am a rabid Unionist, then maybe you should get yourself down to my part of Scotland and spout some of your twisted views. I am sure if you do then you will soon find out what a rabid Unionist really looks like. BTW - your memory is failing you a little. I have never claimed to be sitting on the fence on independence. When I joined, I explained to the forum that I was a No voter who voted that way mainly because I felt that independence would be far too financially damaging and risky. That’s where I was then and, although better informed, that’s pretty much still where I am now, except that I am now more confident that there is no good financial case for leaving the UK - so I feel more rooted in the No side than I was back then. Well, that plus I really don’t want to be on the same side of the divide as any of the Indy zealots on here, obviously. Believe me, I truly believe you are a rabid ultra unionist. The sad thing is that there are loads more like you. People who talk Scotland down at the slightest opportunity. People who believe "their" country is better governed by a Parliament in a foreign country. I posted in another thread about your fence sitting activities. You did not need to make that NO statement though. We were all fully aware of your ultra unionist tendencies. Your laughable attempts at fence sitting were lamentable, did you really think people would take you seriously? Oh, I have no doubt that you believe it, but that says nothing about me and everything about you. I don’t talk Scotland down, but neither do I try to give it a plumped up over-inflated sense of self-importance. Rather, I prefer to deal with the reality of what Scotland is and where it is at. Recognising and addressing the reality is the only sensible starting point for any discussion, which is why you are unable to engage credibly in such discussions. I don’t believe that Scotland is better governed by a Parliament in a foreign country because Scotland is not governed by a Parliament in a foreign country. Rather it is governed by a Parliament of and in the country that Scotland forms part of. This is a wee example of my last point ie. if you can’t acknowledge the realities of what Scotland is and where it is at (as you clearly can’t) then you can’t credibly engage in the discussions. Having said that, I do feel that Scotland is poorly governed from Westminster and that something needs to radically change there. But independence is the nuclear option here, as you don’t make people’s lives better by making them substantially poorer and that, unfortunately, would be one of the certainties of independence. I think that people take me at least as seriously as you and any of the other Indy fanatics on here - and much more seriously than one of them, whom almost nobody takes seriously at all. However, I can’t dictate what people think about my views any more than you can dictate what they think about yours, so why lose sleep over it? And I have never engaged in fence sitting, as you put it. But then again, accepting reality is obviously an issue for you. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Jan 13, 2023 12:39:28 GMT
I have no idea what you are talking about or why, but there was absolutely zero apology in my post. Even by your bizarre and unfathomable standards, this latest offering is genuine nonsense from you from start to finish. Yes I know you do not know what I am talking about. I concluded that way back in the old forum. As your post is directed at nobody. So if it is at me. In my bizzare genuine nonsense which I see once again you refuse to correct. Here is the last bit. See copy and paste below. Could you correct the bizarre nonsense. And answer the question. Have you worked out the two tier energy system yet. One costing 3.7p per KW hour and the other around 50p per KW hour. Or is that bizzare nonsense as well. The ones ranting bizzare nonsense matey is you and the clowns who like your clueless rant. What is your risk assessment waiting to see. So instead of ranting drivel it is wrong. If it is wrong you must know the correct figures. So correct it. What is rocket science in that. This is a copy and paste. It is complete with figures that are not my figures. They come from the ONS, HMRC, UK Treasury, and so on. and it has not changed in the last 24 hours.Well apart from the English debt interest whoich has risen by £432,000,000 in the last 24 hours. . That would buy 4 ferry's. That is the scale your risk assessment is not seeing. And what you call a cock up.. Big time. Stick to fairy's and unicorns You have still not explained this risk assessment as you sit and wait to see how things are going. What do you not see with England and lets not call it anything else with a £2,8 trillion debt. Yes that really is £2,800,000,000,000. Rising at over £5,000 per second. With a up and coming energy crises at around £600 billion. Plus a never ending decommissioning cost around a billion a year.. You put your price on it. A English QE problem of some £800 billion that will have to be paid back by your grandkids grandkids, grandkids. And a Englsih external dent of some $8 trillion USD. Or was your risk assessment still stuck in your brain about a £70 million ferry cock up. So what are you waiting to see. A fairy sitting on top of a unicorn disappearing over the horizon into the sunny uplands. What was that about twisted views. I still don’t know what you are talking about. |
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Jan 15, 2023 9:44:08 GMT
Yes I know you do not know what I am talking about. I concluded that way back in the old forum. As your post is directed at nobody. So if it is at me. In my bizzare genuine nonsense which I see once again you refuse to correct. Here is the last bit. See copy and paste below. Could you correct the bizarre nonsense. And answer the question. Have you worked out the two tier energy system yet. One costing 3.7p per KW hour and the other around 50p per KW hour. Or is that bizzare nonsense as well. The ones ranting bizzare nonsense matey is you and the clowns who like your clueless rant. What is your risk assessment waiting to see. So instead of ranting drivel it is wrong. If it is wrong you must know the correct figures. So correct it. What is rocket science in that. This is a copy and paste. It is complete with figures that are not my figures. They come from the ONS, HMRC, UK Treasury, and so on. and it has not changed in the last 24 hours.Well apart from the English debt interest whoich has risen by £432,000,000 in the last 24 hours. . That would buy 4 ferry's. That is the scale your risk assessment is not seeing. And what you call a cock up.. Big time. Stick to fairy's and unicorns You have still not explained this risk assessment as you sit and wait to see how things are going. What do you not see with England and lets not call it anything else with a £2,8 trillion debt. Yes that really is £2,800,000,000,000. Rising at over £5,000 per second. With a up and coming energy crises at around £600 billion. Plus a never ending decommissioning cost around a billion a year.. You put your price on it. A English QE problem of some £800 billion that will have to be paid back by your grandkids grandkids, grandkids. And a Englsih external dent of some $8 trillion USD. Or was your risk assessment still stuck in your brain about a £70 million ferry cock up. So what are you waiting to see. A fairy sitting on top of a unicorn disappearing over the horizon into the sunny uplands. What was that about twisted views. I still don’t know what you are talking about. No matey. What you mean is your are screwed for a answer. And you are a rabid out and out grade one top of the pops class 1 BritNat Unionist. Why you deny it defies the hell ou of me. It si no a crime. That only applies to SNP and Indy supporters. . That is not a problem as I keep saying. There are a million and one reason for the Jocks to remain part of the UK. The economy is not one of them. And lying otherwise. How anyone can now say that GERs represents the Scottish economy, that is what you said, is on the same planet as Jack the liar. The Secretary of State against Scotland. Two things. Making a statement like that . Make two things a facts. Not opinion. . One you know it is rubbish and lying otherwise. How you can conclude that the Scots are responsible for 60% of the UK deficit is nonsense and you know it. That makes you a liar. Or do not know what you are ranting about. Alas you made the statement it is a true representation of the Scottish economy. On top of you lying about who you were. You have no credibility. But I digress. You matey made the statement, trying make out you were sitting on the fence. That you after your risk assessment garbage were or was waiting to see how the economy was going. I gave you the facts and I gave you the figures. They are not my facts or my figures. They are out there. Here they are again in italics below. So what are you waiting for. A fairy on top of a unicorn towing a sledge to take you to the sunny uplands Now if the figures I published are wrong. Then correct them. Do not just say they are nonsense as you keep saying. It is you who talks nonsense. Or explain in your risk assessment which I do not have clue what it means. Give a reason which is not fiscal. Your fence sitting days are over on fiscal matters. Or point out otherwise. Here is what I said.. AGAIN. Twice in this post .You have still not explained this risk assessment as you sit and wait to see how things are going. What do you not see with England and lets not call it anything else with a £2,8 trillion debt. Yes that really is £2,800,000,000,000. Rising at over £5,000 per second. With a up and coming energy crises at around £600 billion. Plus a never ending decommissioning cost around a billion a year.. You put your price on it. A English QE problem of some £800 billion that will have to be paid back by your grandkids grandkids, grandkids. And a Englsih external dent of some $8 trillion USD. Or was your risk assessment still stuck in your brain about a £70 million ferry cock up. So what are you waiting to see. A fairy sitting on top of a unicorn disappearing over the horizon into the sunny uplands. What was that about twisted views. As I pointed out elsewhere. In the last 24 hours the interest alone on that debt has risen by £420 million. That could buy four ferry's every day. That the BritNats and unionist keep ranting is a disaster. Let's just agree. Your idea of a disaster and mines. Is shall we say.. Different. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Jan 15, 2023 23:53:43 GMT
There are a million and one reason for the Jocks to remain part of the UK. Can you list them please.
How anyone can now say that GERs represents the Scottish economy, that is what you said, Did I really? Can you show me where please.How you can conclude that the Scots are responsible for 60% of the UK deficit is nonsense and you know it. That makes you a liar. I haven’t concluded that. I am not even sure if it is something that I have ever specifically considered. You have still not explained this risk assessmentFar from having not explained it, I have explained as recently as the last few days that I have never even used the term “Risk Assessment” either on here or on the old site. On that basis, what more explanation can you possibly expect to receive?...about a £70 million ferry cock up....That the BritNats and unionist keep ranting is a disaster. The BritNats and unionists might keep doing that and calling it that, but I don’t.
As for the 2 tier energy system that you mentioned in your post prior to this one, I am not aware of that. Can you clarify please.
|
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Jan 16, 2023 9:17:23 GMT
There are a million and one reason for the Jocks to remain part of the UK. Can you list them please.
How anyone can now say that GERs represents the Scottish economy, that is what you said, Did I really? Can you show me where please.How you can conclude that the Scots are responsible for 60% of the UK deficit is nonsense and you know it. That makes you a liar. I haven’t concluded that. I am not even sure if it is something that I have ever specifically considered. You have still not explained this risk assessmentFar from having not explained it, I have explained as recently as the last few days that I have never even used the term “Risk Assessment” either on here or on the old site. On that basis, what more explanation can you possibly expect to receive?...about a £70 million ferry cock up....That the BritNats and unionist keep ranting is a disaster. The BritNats and unionists might keep doing that and calling it that, but I don’t.
As for the 2 tier energy system that you mentioned in your post prior to this one, I am not aware of that. Can you clarify please.
No I am not going to give you a million reason on your stupid question as you go off onto the dblue and beyond. Suffice to say marriage, suffice to say being a Unionist, not a rabid BritNat fascist as most are. Suffice to say the military the only thing that you could reasonably be called British. Yes you did say that GERs were a reasonable representation of the Scottish economy as you now rant and agree that the Scots are not responsible for 60% of the UK deficit. Your ducking diving and weaving is not working matey. You know dam well what you ranted, as do others questioning your risk assessment along the same lines. And yes you did call the ferry cock up a disaster. In terms of the two tier energy system I have explained it. It cost 3.7 pence to produce one kw per hour by renewable and around 50 pence by nuclear and fossil fuel. What part do you find difficult to understand. And you still have not answered one question as you waffle to divert so here it is again. As you sit and wait to see what happened. Well here is what happened . See italics below. What are you waiting for. As you deny using the phrase risk assessment, followed by total bollocks on your exchanges with Ycop001. You have still not explained this risk assessment as you sit and wait to see how things are going. What do you not see with England and lets not call it anything else with a £2,8 trillion debt. Yes that really is £2,800,000,000,000. Rising at over £5,000 per second. With a up and coming energy crises at around £600 billion. Plus a never ending decommissioning cost around a billion a year.. You put your price on it. A English QE problem of some £800 billion that will have to be paid back by your grandkids grandkids, grandkids. And a Englsih external dent of some $8 trillion USD. Or was your risk assessment still stuck in your brain about a £70 million ferry cock up. So what are you waiting to see. A fairy sitting on top of a unicorn disappearing over the horizon into the sunny uplands. What was that about twisted views. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Jan 16, 2023 10:16:10 GMT
So, cutting through all of that nonsense, you can’t back up anything that you say about me (or about anything else that I have asked you about as far as I can make out from the jumbled mess of words above). That’s hardly a surprise because they are not true, certainly not in respect of your repeated false claims about what I have said anyway.
BTW - despite what you say above, nobody else has ever mentioned risk assessments to me or accused me of talking about them. This, like most of what you say, just exists in your mind and nowhere else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Jan 16, 2023 11:34:37 GMT
I have simply stated that I am not a unionist, which is the truth. That is unless you think that anyone who doesn’t want to impose severe long term financial damage on most Scots is a unionist, in which case I stand guilty as charged. You are the most rabid Unionist on the forum. At least the English Scots haters are up front with their Unionist beliefs. You profess to be 'sitting on the fence' but your every post gives the lie to that suggestion. Being anti SNP is not "Scot hating". The SNP got 45% of the Scottish vote, meaning 55% of Scots reject them, just like they did in 2014. It's no good going "we got 45% of the vote, 'freeeeedoommmmmm'," when you actually did far worse than you did in the actual referendum. You've an absolute mountain of votes against you not to mention the legal hurdles. Your dream is dead. |
|
|
|
Post by research0it on Jan 17, 2023 9:35:35 GMT
You are the most rabid Unionist on the forum. At least the English Scots haters are up front with their Unionist beliefs. You profess to be 'sitting on the fence' but your every post gives the lie to that suggestion. Being anti SNP is not "Scot hating". The SNP got 45% of the Scottish vote, meaning 55% of Scots reject them, just like they did in 2014. It's no good going "we got 45% of the vote, 'freeeeedoommmmmm'," when you actually did far worse than you did in the actual referendum. You've an absolute mountain of votes against you not to mention the legal hurdles. Your dream is dead. Hi vinny How does every thread on the scottish section, no matter the subject, end up in a post like this from you? You even tried it on a thread I started, even after I asked you not to. You're obsessed. Calm down. You're factually wrong in your analysis anyway. I could be persuaded either way on the constitution yet have never once voted SNP. A recent analysis showed that around one third labour voters support constitutional change, right up to full independence. |
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Jan 17, 2023 9:49:09 GMT
So, cutting through all of that nonsense, you can’t back up anything that you say about me (or about anything else that I have asked you about as far as I can make out from the jumbled mess of words above). That’s hardly a surprise because they are not true, certainly not in respect of your repeated false claims about what I have said anyway. BTW - despite what you say above, nobody else has ever mentioned risk assessments to me or accused me of talking about them. This, like most of what you say, just exists in your mind and nowhere else. Lets cut out the nonsense and bullshit. Like demanding a million reason why the Scots should remain part of the UK, on a well known expression. This is the 5th time I have posted this and you have not answered one question on your statement that you were waiting to dee how the economy wnet. That is what you said. So cut out the BS and let me remind you again. And yes you did use the expression risk assessment woth Tcop001 on your bollocks as you were discussing the ferry fuck up. So stop lying. Herfe asrfe the same question again. Now you tell me what you are waiting to see what happens. You have still not explained this risk assessment as you sit and wait to see how things are going. What do you not see with England and lets not call it anything else with a £2,8 trillion debt. Yes that really is £2,800,000,000,000. Rising at over £5,000 per second. With a up and coming energy crises at around £600 billion. Plus a never ending decommissioning cost around a billion a year.. You put your price on it. A English QE problem of some £800 billion that will have to be paid back by your grandkids grandkids, grandkids. And a Englsih external dent of some $8 trillion USD. Or was your risk assessment still stuck in your brain about a £70 million ferry cock up. So what are you waiting to see. A fairy sitting on top of a unicorn disappearing over the horizon into the sunny uplands. What was that about twisted views.Could you point out this twisted view. That is what you said. Or are you going into denial on that as well. And you have still not given me one reason on fiscal matters, what would Scotland benefit by remaining part of the UK. As you duck dive and weave. At least you now understand GERs is CRAP. Even the village half wit works out, that it is nonsense. Or are you going to back track on that. |
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Jan 17, 2023 10:32:19 GMT
Being anti SNP is not "Scot hating". The SNP got 45% of the Scottish vote, meaning 55% of Scots reject them, just like they did in 2014. It's no good going "we got 45% of the vote, 'freeeeedoommmmmm'," when you actually did far worse than you did in the actual referendum. You've an absolute mountain of votes against you not to mention the legal hurdles. Your dream is dead. Hi vinny How does every thread on the scottish section, no matter the subject, end up in a post like this from you? You even tried it on a thread I started, even after I asked you not to. You're obsessed. Calm down. You're factually wrong in your analysis anyway. I could be persuaded either way on the constitution yet have never once voted SNP. A recent analysis showed that around one third labour voters support constitutional change, right up to full independence. You are dealing with a out asnd out absolute Jock hater. His hatred of the the First Minister is alarming. I have shown you how he debates. Then having called all asunder a Nazi. This guy wants the Captains of gunships to open fire on woman and kids on small crafts in the Channel. His expression being. Till they get the picture. Then toss those immigrants here out of aircrafts over Somalia. That is what he said. And no doubt deny. On top of which he wants British soldiers to shoot dead injured POW. The term as I recall with ballistic trauma, Which he rants is not murder. Ah well the MOD and Englsih law shall we say. Disagrees. What was that about Nazis. It has also been pointed out to him. That around 100% of all Scottish voters, not all clearly have at one point in time, on one level or another, be it local, national or GE elections have voted for the SNP. So he is talking about the Scots. I put the bit in bold. Because some clown will rant I sad all Scottish voters voted for the SNP. I have in the past pointed out this to him. On top of that. He concludes that any organisation that has the name National in it are Nazis. So the NHS are Nazis in his view. As is the English National football team. That is the warped thinking. The laughable bit. He was once a rabid supporter of the biggest right wing fascist in UK politics. One Nigel Farage, as he insist Nazis and Fascist are left wing. After 12 years or so. He still has not supplied one link to a left wing Neo Nazi or fascist. The clue is in the title. But what the hell. He is the only person ever I now totally ignore. Here is another link on his never ending Scots Nazis. Now KKK. He will have a job denying. This is what you are dealing with. As you are finding out for yourself. He does not debate. This is simply for your info. Make of it what you will. I am surprised he has not flooded the Jock forum out with photographs of Rab C Nesbit or the FM wearing a nazi uniform. Or his favourite saying . Swivel eyed. Whatever that is supposed to mean. When matters under discussion do not go his way. Time will tell.  |
|
