|
|
Post by totheleft3 on Jan 3, 2023 13:07:52 GMT
What you on about sir keir stammer was head of the cps when the rochdale Grooming gang was proscuted that case was the catalist of many other glooming gangs being brought to court. Wikipedia and Fullfact and various other sources state Starmer was appointed DPP and head of the CPS in 2008 and held that post until 2013, whereupon he departed to begin a career as a politician gaining a seat in 2015 One of his first dodgy cases was of course Ian Tomlinson and one has to ask how the dodgiest of forensic scientists with a clear directive never to be allowed to work alone on post mittens again after his previous clusterfuck was allowed, indeed specially called in, to destroy the crucial evidence in that PM The allegations of child abusers enjoying themselves in Rochdale coincided with Starmers appointment and under his watch the allegations were ignored and the abuse allowed to continue for another two years until a new appointment in the local area l d to the resurrection of the abandoned investigation in 2011. So that’s three years under Starmers watch when fuck all was done and indeed allegations were ignored and victims considered unreliable witnesses (source Manchester Evening News) In OXFORD systematic sexual abuse from 1998 to 2012 were investigated in 2011 leading to ten arrests and subsequent investigations in 2015 convicted twelve more. Reports in 2015 showed around 300 girls were probably abused while the police force ignored their complaints. Again, Starmer was in post for 3 years before anything started to be done and nothing as fine under a Labour administration. (Source Wikipedia) The Rotherham abuses started in the late 1980s and continued right up to Starmers departure in 2013. (Source Wikipedia and Andrew Norfolk) I know Starmer boasts of prosecuting rapists but he seems to have done rather less than what he boasts of doing while collecting a tidy sum as DPP You are right the grooming gangs had been going on for decaids can you tell me one court case pre 1997 when labour came to power |
|
|
|
Post by totheleft3 on Jan 3, 2023 13:09:03 GMT
What like Anne cryer? Or the women who spilled the beans on the rochdale gang Who now a labour coucilor In rochdale No the wankers who tried to cover it up for the sake of their diversity bullshit. Like who? |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Jan 3, 2023 13:10:06 GMT
Like an ordered apology means anything. It highlights the mentality of these people, and that's what they want censored. An your evidence it was an 'ordered apology' is just what? The links given even by her critics show that to be an almost certainly untrue assertion. Did you make it up perchance? It does beg the question though that if she is such an active campaigner for child abuse victims why she would retweet such a post. Most answers seem to be at best suspect. It was an accident, was the reply but how could such an accident occur? If she thought it was supposed to be sarcastic then at best she should have seen it in poor taste for those victims she was supposed to be so active for. If she thought it was a parody she was putting down then that was also in poor taste. I do not believe that she thought it was an honest opinion she supported, so I do not believe either she was an apologist for grooming gangs but all the other answers seem to be dodging why she really did it and in terms of answering the question, none have. Her later activity has not really helped clarify the issue. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jan 3, 2023 13:19:31 GMT
Revealed: Rotherham rape gangs cover-up councillor holds senior diversity and inclusion NHS role
A former Labour Party politician who resigned his cabinet position at Rotherham Council in 2015 amid reports that he 'pushed back' discussions on the ethnicity of grooming gangs now works as a senior diversity and inclusion manager in a major NHS body, GB News can reveal.
Mahroof Hussain was embroiled in the Rotherham grooming gangs scandal in 2015 when Dame Louise Casey’s review into the council named him and went on to conclude that the authority was in 'denial' and warped by a culture of bullying, sexism and cover-ups
I wonder how many times this is repeated up & down the country. People who hushed up 'grooming gang' scandals that were later exposed quietly moved on to other senior appointments in the public sector. And of course thanks to diversity quotas, an ex councillor called 'Mahroof Hussain' could walk into any job, especially in the public sector. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Jan 3, 2023 13:29:05 GMT
An your evidence it was an 'ordered apology' is just what? The links given even by her critics show that to be an almost certainly untrue assertion. Did you make it up perchance? It does beg the question though that if she is such an active campaigner for child abuse victims why she would retweet such a post. Most answers seem to be at best suspect. It was an accident, was the reply but how could such an accident occur? If she thought it was supposed to be sarcastic then at best she should have seen it in poor taste for those victims she was supposed to be so active for. If she thought it was a parody she was putting down then that was also in poor taste. I do not believe that she thought it was an honest opinion she supported, so I do not believe either she was an apologist for grooming gangs but all the other answers seem to be dodging why she really did it and in terms of answering the question, none have. Her later activity has not really helped clarify the issue. it was an accident. On a quick first read it could be seen as being a sarcastic tweet |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 3, 2023 13:31:21 GMT
No the wankers who tried to cover it up for the sake of their diversity bullshit. Like who? Do a bit of research. I aint here to be your servant.Typical lefty attitude, sit on your fat arse all day and expect others to do the work for you. |
|
|
|
Post by totheleft3 on Jan 3, 2023 13:44:12 GMT
Do a bit of research. I aint here to be your servant.Typical lefty attitude, sit on your fat arse all day and expect others to do the work for you. Oh I see typical right wing rubbish but unable to back It up |
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Jan 3, 2023 14:06:20 GMT
Apparently Mahroof Hussain has been an MBE. And he now identifies himself as a "an activist against islamophobia". So that pretty much sums him up. He's now part of the muslim fifth column who hate this country and are determined to destroy it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2023 14:12:13 GMT
Absolutely sure John, it still works here but Sky links do have trouble with some cookies. Here have the Beeb link www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-54373013 Anyone with any honesty and sense would see that she saw the original tweet as sarcastic and 'liked it' and as soon as it was explained to her she removed that like. This whole story and line of thread just shows how desperate some people are to find anything no matter how false they can throw at those politicians they disagree with. Both your sky and bbc links have no relevance to the Twitter image which was shown. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Jan 3, 2023 14:38:12 GMT
It does beg the question though that if she is such an active campaigner for child abuse victims why she would retweet such a post. Most answers seem to be at best suspect. It was an accident, was the reply but how could such an accident occur? If she thought it was supposed to be sarcastic then at best she should have seen it in poor taste for those victims she was supposed to be so active for. If she thought it was a parody she was putting down then that was also in poor taste. I do not believe that she thought it was an honest opinion she supported, so I do not believe either she was an apologist for grooming gangs but all the other answers seem to be dodging why she really did it and in terms of answering the question, none have. Her later activity has not really helped clarify the issue. it was an accident. On a quick first read it could be seen as being a sarcastic tweet If she thought it was Owen Jones being sarcastic how could she 'accidently' retweet, if she thought it was a parody account being sarcastic why would she accidently retweet it. An accident expects some form of explanation as to how said accident occurred such as I thought it was humorous, or as RWs would expect us to behave etc etc. But as far as I can see nothing was really explained. Perhaps I missed it. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 3, 2023 15:13:58 GMT
Do a bit of research. I aint here to be your servant.Typical lefty attitude, sit on your fat arse all day and expect others to do the work for you. Oh I see typical right wing rubbish but unable to back It up I can back it up by why would I wish to waste my time? |
|
|
|
Post by totheleft3 on Jan 3, 2023 15:21:31 GMT
Oh I see typical right wing rubbish but unable to back It up I can back it up by why would I wish to waste my time? Ok I take that has a no then |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Jan 3, 2023 17:56:55 GMT
Absolutely sure John, it still works here but Sky links do have trouble with some cookies. Here have the Beeb link www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-54373013 Anyone with any honesty and sense would see that she saw the original tweet as sarcastic and 'liked it' and as soon as it was explained to her she removed that like. This whole story and line of thread just shows how desperate some people are to find anything no matter how false they can throw at those politicians they disagree with. Both your sky and bbc links have no relevance to the Twitter image which was shown. Err yes they do if you think it through |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2023 18:01:54 GMT
Both your sky and bbc links have no relevance to the Twitter image which was shown. Err yes they do if you think it through Err no they don't. Only in your twisted mind. Whilst on about Naz, who was it wrote a Facebook post arguing for Israel’s population to be “transported” out of the Middle East to America? |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Jan 3, 2023 18:07:14 GMT
Look Barry it isn't rocket science to join up the dots is it. In fact if you read the thread you'd see it.
|
|
